Evaluating Hemoglobin Thresholds for Blood Transfusions in Oncology Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.

IF 1.2 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Journal of hematology Pub Date : 2026-04-06 eCollection Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.14740/jh2178
Barath Prashanth Sivasubramanian, Abijha Boban, Andrew Strike, Moyan Sun, Ania Izabela Rynarzewska, Hardeep Singh, Dhaval Patel
{"title":"Evaluating Hemoglobin Thresholds for Blood Transfusions in Oncology Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.","authors":"Barath Prashanth Sivasubramanian, Abijha Boban, Andrew Strike, Moyan Sun, Ania Izabela Rynarzewska, Hardeep Singh, Dhaval Patel","doi":"10.14740/jh2178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the intensive care unit (ICU), up to 90% of patients develop anemia during their stay. However, evidence regarding transfusion practices in oncology patients requiring ICU-level care is limited. This study aimed to compare mortality, survival rate, and readmissions across three hemoglobin thresholds of transfusion (low < 7 g/dL, intermediate 7-8 g/dL, and high > 8 g/dL) among these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 561 patients with cancer admitted to the ICU who received blood transfusions from 2017 to 2023 was performed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were utilized to compare three hemoglobin thresholds of transfusion. A P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 561 patients, the transfusion burden was greater in the low threshold cohort (46.6%), followed by intermediate (29.3%) and high (24.1%) thresholds. The low threshold cohort required a longer duration of mechanical ventilation compared to the high threshold (P ≤ 0.03). The readmission rate was highest in the low threshold cohort compared to the others (30-day: 23.4% vs 11% vs 16.3%; 90-day: 3.1% vs 1.2% vs 2.2%). Mortality risk was elevated in patients transfused at high thresholds compared with those transfused at low thresholds (odds ratio (OR), 1.893; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.093-3.281; P < 0.05), and mortality did not differ between the low and intermediate thresholds (P > 0.05). The intermediate threshold showed the highest survival probability, and the high threshold had the worst survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with malignancy admitted to the ICU, transfusions administered at levels < 7 g/dL were associated with a greater transfusion burden, longer mechanical ventilation, and higher 30- and 90-day readmissions. The high threshold was associated with poor survival. These findings highlight the need for prospective studies in ICU oncology on the blood transfusion threshold.</p>","PeriodicalId":15964,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hematology","volume":"15 2","pages":"80-89"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13071945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/jh2178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the intensive care unit (ICU), up to 90% of patients develop anemia during their stay. However, evidence regarding transfusion practices in oncology patients requiring ICU-level care is limited. This study aimed to compare mortality, survival rate, and readmissions across three hemoglobin thresholds of transfusion (low < 7 g/dL, intermediate 7-8 g/dL, and high > 8 g/dL) among these patients.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 561 patients with cancer admitted to the ICU who received blood transfusions from 2017 to 2023 was performed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were utilized to compare three hemoglobin thresholds of transfusion. A P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Of 561 patients, the transfusion burden was greater in the low threshold cohort (46.6%), followed by intermediate (29.3%) and high (24.1%) thresholds. The low threshold cohort required a longer duration of mechanical ventilation compared to the high threshold (P ≤ 0.03). The readmission rate was highest in the low threshold cohort compared to the others (30-day: 23.4% vs 11% vs 16.3%; 90-day: 3.1% vs 1.2% vs 2.2%). Mortality risk was elevated in patients transfused at high thresholds compared with those transfused at low thresholds (odds ratio (OR), 1.893; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.093-3.281; P < 0.05), and mortality did not differ between the low and intermediate thresholds (P > 0.05). The intermediate threshold showed the highest survival probability, and the high threshold had the worst survival.

Conclusions: In patients with malignancy admitted to the ICU, transfusions administered at levels < 7 g/dL were associated with a greater transfusion burden, longer mechanical ventilation, and higher 30- and 90-day readmissions. The high threshold was associated with poor survival. These findings highlight the need for prospective studies in ICU oncology on the blood transfusion threshold.

评估重症监护室肿瘤患者输血的血红蛋白阈值。
背景:在重症监护病房(ICU),高达90%的患者在住院期间发生贫血。然而,关于需要icu级别护理的肿瘤患者输血实践的证据有限。本研究旨在比较这些患者在三个血红蛋白阈值(低< 7 g/dL,中7-8 g/dL和高8 g/dL)输血时的死亡率、生存率和再入院率。方法:回顾性分析2017 - 2023年ICU收治的561例接受输血治疗的癌症患者。采用单因素和多因素分析比较三种输血血红蛋白阈值。A P≤0.05被认为是显著的。结果:在561例患者中,低阈值组的输血负担较大(46.6%),其次是中阈值组(29.3%)和高阈值组(24.1%)。与高阈值组相比,低阈值组需要更长的机械通气时间(P≤0.03)。与其他组相比,低阈值组的再入院率最高(30天:23.4%对11%对16.3%;90天:3.1%对1.2%对2.2%)。高阈值输注患者的死亡风险高于低阈值输注患者(优势比(OR), 1.893;95%置信区间(CI), 1.093-3.281;P < 0.05),低、中阈值间死亡率无显著差异(P < 0.05)。中间阈值生存率最高,高阈值生存率最差。结论:在ICU收治的恶性肿瘤患者中,输血水平< 7 g/dL与更大的输血负担、更长的机械通气时间以及更高的30天和90天再入院率相关。高阈值与较差的生存率相关。这些发现强调了对ICU肿瘤学输血阈值进行前瞻性研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of hematology
Journal of hematology HEMATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书