{"title":"Augmented reality for ultrasound-guided venipuncture: a pilot study on a simulated vascular access model.","authors":"Cosimo Aliani, Alberto Morelli, Simona Cristina Aiello, Fulvio Pinelli, Gianluca Villa, Stefano Romagnoli, Leonardo Bocchi","doi":"10.1007/s10877-026-01437-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the feasibility of a low-cost augmented reality (AR) workflow for ultrasound-guided venipuncture and whether AR visualisation is non-inferior to conventional monitor guidance in total procedure time while improving user experience. Real-time ultrasound video from a conventional scanner was captured via an HDMI-to-USB device, pre-processed with a Python/OpenCV pipeline, and streamed over Wi-Fi to a HoloLens 2 headset using WebSocket. A turkey-thigh model with an embedded fluid-filled catheter simulated a peripheral vein. One experienced implantation nurse performed 58 venipuncture attempts with standard monitor guidance and 58 with AR (monitor blanked during AR). Total procedure time (TPT) was recorded for each attempt, and a questionnaire assessed perceived difficulty, image quality, usability, reliability, and ergonomic comfort. With all data included, overall TPT was comparable between standard and AR guidance ([Formula: see text] s vs. [Formula: see text] s; [Formula: see text]). After excluding predefined outliers, overall TPT remained non-significantly lower with AR ([Formula: see text] s vs. [Formula: see text] s; [Formula: see text]); on day 2 the p-value decreased to 0.103 ([Formula: see text] s vs. [Formula: see text] s). Questionnaire responses favoured AR for gaze continuity, perceived coordination, usability, and ergonomic comfort, with acceptable image quality. AR-assisted ultrasound-guided venipuncture was feasible and did not add measurable temporal overhead for an expert operator, while improving perceived ergonomics. Larger, multi-operator clinical studies are needed to confirm performance effects and clinical impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"917-922"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13391783/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-026-01437-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To evaluate the feasibility of a low-cost augmented reality (AR) workflow for ultrasound-guided venipuncture and whether AR visualisation is non-inferior to conventional monitor guidance in total procedure time while improving user experience. Real-time ultrasound video from a conventional scanner was captured via an HDMI-to-USB device, pre-processed with a Python/OpenCV pipeline, and streamed over Wi-Fi to a HoloLens 2 headset using WebSocket. A turkey-thigh model with an embedded fluid-filled catheter simulated a peripheral vein. One experienced implantation nurse performed 58 venipuncture attempts with standard monitor guidance and 58 with AR (monitor blanked during AR). Total procedure time (TPT) was recorded for each attempt, and a questionnaire assessed perceived difficulty, image quality, usability, reliability, and ergonomic comfort. With all data included, overall TPT was comparable between standard and AR guidance ([Formula: see text] s vs. [Formula: see text] s; [Formula: see text]). After excluding predefined outliers, overall TPT remained non-significantly lower with AR ([Formula: see text] s vs. [Formula: see text] s; [Formula: see text]); on day 2 the p-value decreased to 0.103 ([Formula: see text] s vs. [Formula: see text] s). Questionnaire responses favoured AR for gaze continuity, perceived coordination, usability, and ergonomic comfort, with acceptable image quality. AR-assisted ultrasound-guided venipuncture was feasible and did not add measurable temporal overhead for an expert operator, while improving perceived ergonomics. Larger, multi-operator clinical studies are needed to confirm performance effects and clinical impact.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine.
The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group.
The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.