Augmented reality for ultrasound-guided venipuncture: a pilot study on a simulated vascular access model.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Cosimo Aliani, Alberto Morelli, Simona Cristina Aiello, Fulvio Pinelli, Gianluca Villa, Stefano Romagnoli, Leonardo Bocchi
{"title":"Augmented reality for ultrasound-guided venipuncture: a pilot study on a simulated vascular access model.","authors":"Cosimo Aliani, Alberto Morelli, Simona Cristina Aiello, Fulvio Pinelli, Gianluca Villa, Stefano Romagnoli, Leonardo Bocchi","doi":"10.1007/s10877-026-01437-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the feasibility of a low-cost augmented reality (AR) workflow for ultrasound-guided venipuncture and whether AR visualisation is non-inferior to conventional monitor guidance in total procedure time while improving user experience. Real-time ultrasound video from a conventional scanner was captured via an HDMI-to-USB device, pre-processed with a Python/OpenCV pipeline, and streamed over Wi-Fi to a HoloLens 2 headset using WebSocket. A turkey-thigh model with an embedded fluid-filled catheter simulated a peripheral vein. One experienced implantation nurse performed 58 venipuncture attempts with standard monitor guidance and 58 with AR (monitor blanked during AR). Total procedure time (TPT) was recorded for each attempt, and a questionnaire assessed perceived difficulty, image quality, usability, reliability, and ergonomic comfort. With all data included, overall TPT was comparable between standard and AR guidance ([Formula: see text] s vs. [Formula: see text] s; [Formula: see text]). After excluding predefined outliers, overall TPT remained non-significantly lower with AR ([Formula: see text] s vs. [Formula: see text] s; [Formula: see text]); on day 2 the p-value decreased to 0.103 ([Formula: see text] s vs. [Formula: see text] s). Questionnaire responses favoured AR for gaze continuity, perceived coordination, usability, and ergonomic comfort, with acceptable image quality. AR-assisted ultrasound-guided venipuncture was feasible and did not add measurable temporal overhead for an expert operator, while improving perceived ergonomics. Larger, multi-operator clinical studies are needed to confirm performance effects and clinical impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"917-922"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13391783/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-026-01437-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate the feasibility of a low-cost augmented reality (AR) workflow for ultrasound-guided venipuncture and whether AR visualisation is non-inferior to conventional monitor guidance in total procedure time while improving user experience. Real-time ultrasound video from a conventional scanner was captured via an HDMI-to-USB device, pre-processed with a Python/OpenCV pipeline, and streamed over Wi-Fi to a HoloLens 2 headset using WebSocket. A turkey-thigh model with an embedded fluid-filled catheter simulated a peripheral vein. One experienced implantation nurse performed 58 venipuncture attempts with standard monitor guidance and 58 with AR (monitor blanked during AR). Total procedure time (TPT) was recorded for each attempt, and a questionnaire assessed perceived difficulty, image quality, usability, reliability, and ergonomic comfort. With all data included, overall TPT was comparable between standard and AR guidance ([Formula: see text] s vs. [Formula: see text] s; [Formula: see text]). After excluding predefined outliers, overall TPT remained non-significantly lower with AR ([Formula: see text] s vs. [Formula: see text] s; [Formula: see text]); on day 2 the p-value decreased to 0.103 ([Formula: see text] s vs. [Formula: see text] s). Questionnaire responses favoured AR for gaze continuity, perceived coordination, usability, and ergonomic comfort, with acceptable image quality. AR-assisted ultrasound-guided venipuncture was feasible and did not add measurable temporal overhead for an expert operator, while improving perceived ergonomics. Larger, multi-operator clinical studies are needed to confirm performance effects and clinical impact.

超声引导静脉穿刺的增强现实:模拟血管通路模型的初步研究。
评估超声引导静脉穿刺的低成本增强现实(AR)工作流程的可行性,以及AR可视化在改善用户体验的同时,在总手术时间上是否优于传统监护引导。来自传统扫描仪的实时超声视频通过HDMI-to-USB设备捕获,使用Python/OpenCV管道进行预处理,并通过Wi-Fi通过WebSocket传输到HoloLens 2耳机。植入充液导管的火鸡大腿模型模拟外周静脉。一位经验丰富的植入术护士在标准监护仪引导下进行了58次静脉穿刺,在AR下进行了58次静脉穿刺(AR期间关闭监护仪)。记录每次尝试的总手术时间(TPT),并通过问卷评估感知难度、图像质量、可用性、可靠性和人体工程学舒适度。包括所有数据,总体TPT在标准和AR指导之间具有可比性([公式:见文]vs.[公式:见文];[公式:见文])。在排除预定义异常值后,总体TPT随AR的降低仍然不显著([公式:见文]vs.[公式:见文];[公式:见文]);第2天p值降至0.103([公式:见文]vs.[公式:见文]s)。问卷调查结果在注视连续性、感知协调性、可用性和符合人体工程学的舒适度方面支持AR,图像质量可接受。ar辅助超声引导静脉穿刺是可行的,对于专业操作员来说不会增加可测量的时间开销,同时改善了感知的人体工程学。需要更大的、多操作者的临床研究来确认性能效果和临床影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书