Engraftment Outcome of CRISPR/Cas9-Edited Hematopoietic Stem Cells for Genetic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Evidence.

IF 1.2 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Journal of hematology Pub Date : 2026-04-06 eCollection Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.14740/jh2190
Sudhanshu Yadav, Bandana Chakravarti, Baby Anjum, Shubhanshu Yadav, Prashant Kumar Singh, Ashok Kumar
{"title":"Engraftment Outcome of CRISPR/Cas9-Edited Hematopoietic Stem Cells for Genetic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Evidence.","authors":"Sudhanshu Yadav, Bandana Chakravarti, Baby Anjum, Shubhanshu Yadav, Prashant Kumar Singh, Ashok Kumar","doi":"10.14740/jh2190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>CRISPR-Cas9 (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and CRISPR-associated protein 9)-based gene editing represents a promising frontier for treating monogenic hematologic disorders. Several preclinical studies have demonstrated the transplantation efficiency of CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene editing in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) using various animal models. Nonetheless, these studies have employed diverse gene-editing strategies, utilizing HSPCs from different origins and transplanting them into distinct mouse strains. The present study aimed to determine the optimum conditions for efficient engraftment of genetically modified HSPCs across various organs, thereby facilitating the translation of preclinical research into clinical applications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive literature search using PubMed Medline, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for relevant articles published from 2014 to 2025 that evaluated the engraftment potential of CRISPR-Cas9 HSPCs in genetic disease models. A total of 39 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in a meta-analysis using Jamovi software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed a significantly reduced engraftment of gene-edited cells in the bone marrow, spleen, and peripheral blood in the pooled analysis. Subgroup analyses revealed that knockout cells exhibited diminished engraftment, whereas knock-in cells demonstrated engraftment levels comparable to those of their non-edited counterparts. No evidence of publication bias or substantial heterogeneity in the study design or outcomes was detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Identifying the optimal parameters for gene editing to enhance engraftment efficiency may provide crucial insights for designing future clinical trials and advancing the therapeutic application of CRISPR-Cas9 edited HSPCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15964,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hematology","volume":"15 2","pages":"108-128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13071946/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/jh2190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: CRISPR-Cas9 (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and CRISPR-associated protein 9)-based gene editing represents a promising frontier for treating monogenic hematologic disorders. Several preclinical studies have demonstrated the transplantation efficiency of CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene editing in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) using various animal models. Nonetheless, these studies have employed diverse gene-editing strategies, utilizing HSPCs from different origins and transplanting them into distinct mouse strains. The present study aimed to determine the optimum conditions for efficient engraftment of genetically modified HSPCs across various organs, thereby facilitating the translation of preclinical research into clinical applications.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search using PubMed Medline, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for relevant articles published from 2014 to 2025 that evaluated the engraftment potential of CRISPR-Cas9 HSPCs in genetic disease models. A total of 39 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in a meta-analysis using Jamovi software.

Results: The study revealed a significantly reduced engraftment of gene-edited cells in the bone marrow, spleen, and peripheral blood in the pooled analysis. Subgroup analyses revealed that knockout cells exhibited diminished engraftment, whereas knock-in cells demonstrated engraftment levels comparable to those of their non-edited counterparts. No evidence of publication bias or substantial heterogeneity in the study design or outcomes was detected.

Conclusions: Identifying the optimal parameters for gene editing to enhance engraftment efficiency may provide crucial insights for designing future clinical trials and advancing the therapeutic application of CRISPR-Cas9 edited HSPCs.

CRISPR/ cas9编辑的造血干细胞用于遗传性疾病的植入结果:临床前证据的系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:基于CRISPR-Cas9(聚集规律间隔短回文重复序列和crispr相关蛋白9)的基因编辑代表了治疗单基因血液病的一个有希望的前沿。一些临床前研究已经利用各种动物模型证明了crispr - cas9介导的基因编辑在造血干细胞和祖细胞(HSPCs)中的移植效率。尽管如此,这些研究采用了不同的基因编辑策略,利用来自不同来源的HSPCs并将其移植到不同的小鼠品系中。本研究旨在确定转基因造血干细胞在不同器官间高效移植的最佳条件,从而促进临床前研究向临床应用的转化。方法:我们使用PubMed Medline、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar网站,对2014年至2025年发表的评估CRISPR-Cas9 HSPCs在遗传病模型中植入潜力的相关文章进行了全面的文献检索。共有39项研究符合纳入标准,并使用Jamovi软件纳入meta分析。结果:在汇总分析中,该研究显示骨髓、脾脏和外周血中基因编辑细胞的植入显著减少。亚组分析显示,敲除细胞的植入减少,而敲入细胞的植入水平与未编辑的细胞相当。在研究设计或结果中没有发现发表偏倚或实质性异质性的证据。结论:确定基因编辑的最佳参数以提高植入效率,可能为设计未来的临床试验和推进CRISPR-Cas9编辑的HSPCs的治疗应用提供重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of hematology
Journal of hematology HEMATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书