Effect of Oral Corticosteroid Premedication on the Success of Anaesthetising Mandibular Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

IF 7.1 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Nandini Suresh, Monika Arulalan, Geethanjali Ravindra Raj, Velmurugan Natanasabapathy, Sheela B Abraham, Sajesh K Veettil, Thiago César da Silva Lima, Juliana Vilela Bastos, Shaju Jacob Pulikkotil, Venkateshbabu Nagendrababu
{"title":"Effect of Oral Corticosteroid Premedication on the Success of Anaesthetising Mandibular Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.","authors":"Nandini Suresh, Monika Arulalan, Geethanjali Ravindra Raj, Velmurugan Natanasabapathy, Sheela B Abraham, Sajesh K Veettil, Thiago César da Silva Lima, Juliana Vilela Bastos, Shaju Jacob Pulikkotil, Venkateshbabu Nagendrababu","doi":"10.1111/iej.70162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted with the objective of evaluating the effectiveness of oral corticosteroid premedication to achieve profound mandibular anaesthesia in teeth diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science to identify randomized clinical trials that evaluated the effect of oral corticosteroid premedication on the success of mandibular anaesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis. The search was performed without date restrictions and limited to trials in English. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0). A random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled effect risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary meta-analysis was conducted by including all the trials whilst sensitivity analyses were conducted only on trials with a low risk of bias. Sub-group analyses were performed to assess the dose-response effect. A TSA was performed to evaluate the risks of random errors in the meta-analysis. The overall certainty of evidence was evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8 trials were included in the review. The primary meta-analysis demonstrated that oral premedication with dexamethasone significantly increased the success rate of inferior alveolar nerve blocks (IANB) compared with a placebo (RR = 1.80; 95% CI, 1.35-2.41). The sensitivity analysis demonstrated a similar result compared to the primary analysis. The sub-group analysis suggested that doses of both 0.5 mg and 4 mg were effective. Oral premedication with dexamethasone had the same effect on IANB success rates when compared to NSAIDs. The TSA confirmed that the evidence for a beneficial effect of oral dexamethasone premedication when compared to placebo for enhancing the anaesthetic efficacy of IANB in teeth with irreversible pulpitis was conclusive. The GRADE was rated as 'moderate' and 'high' when oral corticosteroids were compared with placebo and NSAID, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oral corticosteroid premedication improves the efficacy of IANB compared to placebo and has a similar effect when compared to NSAIDs in mandibular teeth diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis.</p><p><strong>Clinical registration: </strong>PROSPERO (CRD42024508463).</p>","PeriodicalId":13724,"journal":{"name":"International endodontic journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International endodontic journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.70162","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted with the objective of evaluating the effectiveness of oral corticosteroid premedication to achieve profound mandibular anaesthesia in teeth diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis.

Methods: An electronic search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science to identify randomized clinical trials that evaluated the effect of oral corticosteroid premedication on the success of mandibular anaesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis. The search was performed without date restrictions and limited to trials in English. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0). A random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled effect risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary meta-analysis was conducted by including all the trials whilst sensitivity analyses were conducted only on trials with a low risk of bias. Sub-group analyses were performed to assess the dose-response effect. A TSA was performed to evaluate the risks of random errors in the meta-analysis. The overall certainty of evidence was evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

Results: A total of 8 trials were included in the review. The primary meta-analysis demonstrated that oral premedication with dexamethasone significantly increased the success rate of inferior alveolar nerve blocks (IANB) compared with a placebo (RR = 1.80; 95% CI, 1.35-2.41). The sensitivity analysis demonstrated a similar result compared to the primary analysis. The sub-group analysis suggested that doses of both 0.5 mg and 4 mg were effective. Oral premedication with dexamethasone had the same effect on IANB success rates when compared to NSAIDs. The TSA confirmed that the evidence for a beneficial effect of oral dexamethasone premedication when compared to placebo for enhancing the anaesthetic efficacy of IANB in teeth with irreversible pulpitis was conclusive. The GRADE was rated as 'moderate' and 'high' when oral corticosteroids were compared with placebo and NSAID, respectively.

Conclusion: Oral corticosteroid premedication improves the efficacy of IANB compared to placebo and has a similar effect when compared to NSAIDs in mandibular teeth diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis.

Clinical registration: PROSPERO (CRD42024508463).

口服皮质类固醇预用药对不可逆牙髓炎下颌骨麻醉成功的影响:随机临床试验荟萃分析和试验序贯分析的系统评价。
目的:本系统综述采用荟萃分析和试验序列分析(TSA)进行,目的是评估口服皮质类固醇预用药对诊断为不可逆性牙髓炎的牙齿实现下颌深度麻醉的有效性。方法:电子检索PubMed/MEDLINE、Cochrane Library、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science,以确定评估口服皮质类固醇预用药对不可逆性牙髓炎患者下颌麻醉成功影响的随机临床试验。本研究不受日期限制,且仅限于英文试验。使用Cochrane随机试验偏倚风险工具(RoB 2.0)评估偏倚风险。随机效应荟萃分析采用95%置信区间(ci)计算合并效应风险比(rr)。主要荟萃分析包括所有试验,而敏感性分析仅对低偏倚风险的试验进行。亚组分析评估剂量-反应效应。在meta分析中进行TSA来评估随机错误的风险。通过建议评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)来评估证据的总体确定性。结果:共纳入8项试验。初步荟萃分析显示,与安慰剂相比,口服地塞米松预用药可显著提高下肺泡神经阻滞(IANB)的成功率(RR = 1.80; 95% CI, 1.35-2.41)。敏感性分析与初步分析结果相似。亚组分析表明,0.5毫克和4毫克的剂量都有效。与非甾体抗炎药相比,口服前用药地塞米松对IANB成功率有相同的影响。TSA证实,与安慰剂相比,口服地塞米松药物前治疗在增强IANB对不可逆牙髓炎牙齿的麻醉效果方面的有益效果是确凿的。当口服皮质类固醇与安慰剂和非甾体抗炎药进行比较时,GRADE分别被评为“中等”和“高”。结论:与安慰剂相比,口服皮质类固醇预用药可提高IANB在诊断为不可逆性牙髓炎的下颌牙中的疗效,与非甾体抗炎药相比效果相似。临床注册:普洛斯彼罗(CRD42024508463)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International endodontic journal
International endodontic journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
28.00%
发文量
195
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Endodontic Journal is published monthly and strives to publish original articles of the highest quality to disseminate scientific and clinical knowledge; all manuscripts are subjected to peer review. Original scientific articles are published in the areas of biomedical science, applied materials science, bioengineering, epidemiology and social science relevant to endodontic disease and its management, and to the restoration of root-treated teeth. In addition, review articles, reports of clinical cases, book reviews, summaries and abstracts of scientific meetings and news items are accepted. The International Endodontic Journal is essential reading for general dental practitioners, specialist endodontists, research, scientists and dental teachers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书