Mortality After Operatively Treated Cervical Spine Fractures - A National FinSpine Register Study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-15 DOI:10.1177/21925682261442458
Nils Danner, Nikolai Klimko, Henri Salo, Ville Leinonen, Jukka Huttunen
{"title":"Mortality After Operatively Treated Cervical Spine Fractures - A National FinSpine Register Study.","authors":"Nils Danner, Nikolai Klimko, Henri Salo, Ville Leinonen, Jukka Huttunen","doi":"10.1177/21925682261442458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignNationwide register study.ObjectiveThe incidence of cervical spine fractures and related surgeries are increasing in the ageing population, yet population-based outcome data remain limited. This study aimed to identify factors associated with mortality and to analyze causes of death following surgical treatment for cervical spine fractures in a nationwide cohort.MethodsA cohort of 979 patients undergoing surgery for cervical spine fractures (2017-2024) was identified from the nationwide FinSpine register. Independent risk factors for mortality were identified with Cox proportional hazards models. Patient data were linked with national records on mortality and causes-of-death. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated for comparison with the age- and sex-matched general population.ResultsThe 1-year mortality rate was 11.8%, increasing with age from 3.9% in patients younger than 65 years to 24.9% in those aged 85 years or older. Increasing age (HR 1.06 per year) and spinal cord injury (HR 1.71) predicted mortality. Compared with the general population, mortality was significantly elevated across all age groups, with highest standardized mortality ratio in patients younger than 65 years (SMR 8.3) and lowest for patients aged ≥85 years (SMR 2.0). External causes (accidents and violence) were the leading causes of death and highly over-represented (SMR 22.7) in the patients.ConclusionsIncreasing age and spinal cord injury predict mortality after surgery for cervical spine fractures. The low relative excess mortality in elderly patients, compared to the general population, supports the potential role of operative management with careful patient selection even in advanced age.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"3560-3568"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13083284/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682261442458","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study DesignNationwide register study.ObjectiveThe incidence of cervical spine fractures and related surgeries are increasing in the ageing population, yet population-based outcome data remain limited. This study aimed to identify factors associated with mortality and to analyze causes of death following surgical treatment for cervical spine fractures in a nationwide cohort.MethodsA cohort of 979 patients undergoing surgery for cervical spine fractures (2017-2024) was identified from the nationwide FinSpine register. Independent risk factors for mortality were identified with Cox proportional hazards models. Patient data were linked with national records on mortality and causes-of-death. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated for comparison with the age- and sex-matched general population.ResultsThe 1-year mortality rate was 11.8%, increasing with age from 3.9% in patients younger than 65 years to 24.9% in those aged 85 years or older. Increasing age (HR 1.06 per year) and spinal cord injury (HR 1.71) predicted mortality. Compared with the general population, mortality was significantly elevated across all age groups, with highest standardized mortality ratio in patients younger than 65 years (SMR 8.3) and lowest for patients aged ≥85 years (SMR 2.0). External causes (accidents and violence) were the leading causes of death and highly over-represented (SMR 22.7) in the patients.ConclusionsIncreasing age and spinal cord injury predict mortality after surgery for cervical spine fractures. The low relative excess mortality in elderly patients, compared to the general population, supports the potential role of operative management with careful patient selection even in advanced age.

颈椎骨折手术治疗后的死亡率——一项全国脊柱登记研究。
研究设计全国注册研究。目的在老龄化人群中,颈椎骨折及相关手术的发生率正在增加,但基于人群的结局数据仍然有限。本研究旨在确定与死亡率相关的因素,并分析全国范围内颈椎骨折手术治疗后的死亡原因。方法从全国FinSpine登记的979例颈椎骨折手术患者(2017-2024)中确定一组队列。采用Cox比例风险模型确定死亡率的独立危险因素。患者数据与全国死亡率和死因记录相关联。计算标准化死亡率(SMRs),以便与年龄和性别匹配的一般人群进行比较。结果1年死亡率为11.8%,随年龄增长,65岁以下患者死亡率为3.9%,85岁及以上患者死亡率为24.9%。年龄增加(HR 1.06 /年)和脊髓损伤(HR 1.71)预测死亡率。与一般人群相比,所有年龄组的死亡率均显著升高,65岁以下患者的标准化死亡率最高(SMR 8.3),≥85岁患者的标准化死亡率最低(SMR 2.0)。外因(事故和暴力)是导致死亡的主要原因,在患者中所占比例很高(SMR为22.7)。结论年龄增大和脊髓损伤可预测颈椎骨折术后死亡率。与一般人群相比,老年患者的相对超额死亡率较低,这支持了即使在高龄患者中也要谨慎选择手术治疗的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书