Italian Medicines Agency's reform and time until pricing and reimbursement decisions: a time-to-event analysis.

IF 0.7 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment Pub Date : 2026-04-09 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.33393/grhta.2026.3671
Gian Marco Raspolini, Bruno Federico, Mario Cesare Nurchis, Gianfranco Damiani, Raffaella Cocciolo, Paola Turella, Daniela Pilunni, Pierluigi Navarra
{"title":"Italian Medicines Agency's reform and time until pricing and reimbursement decisions: a time-to-event analysis.","authors":"Gian Marco Raspolini, Bruno Federico, Mario Cesare Nurchis, Gianfranco Damiani, Raffaella Cocciolo, Paola Turella, Daniela Pilunni, Pierluigi Navarra","doi":"10.33393/grhta.2026.3671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The duration of pricing and reimbursement (P&R) negotiations is a key performance indicator for medicines agencies in universal health coverage systems. In early 2024, the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) underwent a major reform, including the merging of the previous Scientific-Technical Committee and Price and Reimbursement Committee into a single Scientific and Economic Committee. This study evaluates the reform's impact on time to P&R determinations for new medicines in Italy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A time-to-event analysis was conducted on 139 new chemical entities authorized by the European Commission (EC) between February 2021 and December 2023. The primary outcome was the time from marketing authorization (MA) to publication of AIFA's P&R determination. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare reclassification hazards between pre- (before March 2024) and post-reform groups of medicinal products, based on a fixed separation date, adjusting for antineoplastic therapeutic area and pharmaceutical company size. Four sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The multivariate Cox model, adjusting for antineoplastics, products from major corporations, and orphan medicines, showed that the reform was associated with an 84% increase in reclassification hazards (HR = 1.84, 95% CI 1.20-2.82, p = 0.005). Sensitivity analyses corroborated these findings, showing even greater improvements when focusing on national evaluation timeframes (HR = 11.57 and HR = 3.91).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The consolidation of separate committees into a unified structure, as a part of the 2024 AIFA reform, was accompanied by accelerated P&R negotiations for new medicines in Italy, demonstrating that structural optimization of health technology assessment processes may enhance system efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":12627,"journal":{"name":"Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment","volume":"13 ","pages":"79-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13071805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2026.3671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The duration of pricing and reimbursement (P&R) negotiations is a key performance indicator for medicines agencies in universal health coverage systems. In early 2024, the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) underwent a major reform, including the merging of the previous Scientific-Technical Committee and Price and Reimbursement Committee into a single Scientific and Economic Committee. This study evaluates the reform's impact on time to P&R determinations for new medicines in Italy.

Methods: A time-to-event analysis was conducted on 139 new chemical entities authorized by the European Commission (EC) between February 2021 and December 2023. The primary outcome was the time from marketing authorization (MA) to publication of AIFA's P&R determination. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare reclassification hazards between pre- (before March 2024) and post-reform groups of medicinal products, based on a fixed separation date, adjusting for antineoplastic therapeutic area and pharmaceutical company size. Four sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of the results.

Results: The multivariate Cox model, adjusting for antineoplastics, products from major corporations, and orphan medicines, showed that the reform was associated with an 84% increase in reclassification hazards (HR = 1.84, 95% CI 1.20-2.82, p = 0.005). Sensitivity analyses corroborated these findings, showing even greater improvements when focusing on national evaluation timeframes (HR = 11.57 and HR = 3.91).

Conclusion: The consolidation of separate committees into a unified structure, as a part of the 2024 AIFA reform, was accompanied by accelerated P&R negotiations for new medicines in Italy, demonstrating that structural optimization of health technology assessment processes may enhance system efficiency.

意大利药品管理局的改革与定价和报销决策的时间:时间对事件的分析。
定价和报销谈判的持续时间是全民健康覆盖系统中药品机构的一项关键绩效指标。2024年初,意大利药品管理局(AIFA)进行了一次重大改革,包括将以前的科学技术委员会和价格和报销委员会合并为一个科学和经济委员会。本研究评估了改革对意大利新药P&R决定时间的影响。方法:对欧盟委员会(EC)在2021年2月至2023年12月期间批准的139种新化学实体进行了时间-事件分析。主要结果是从上市许可(MA)到发布AIFA P&R决定的时间。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线和Cox比例风险模型,以固定的分离日期为基础,根据抗肿瘤治疗面积和制药公司规模进行调整,比较改革前(2024年3月之前)和改革后药品组的再分类风险。四项敏感性分析检验了结果的稳健性。结果:调整抗肿瘤药物、大公司产品和孤儿药的多变量Cox模型显示,改革与重新分类风险增加84%相关(HR = 1.84, 95% CI 1.20-2.82, p = 0.005)。敏感性分析证实了这些发现,当关注国家评估时间框架时显示出更大的改进(HR = 11.57和HR = 3.91)。结论:作为2024年AIFA改革的一部分,意大利将独立的委员会整合为一个统一的结构,同时加速了新药的P&R谈判,这表明卫生技术评估过程的结构优化可以提高系统效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment
Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment (GRHTA) is a peer-reviewed, open access journal which aims to promote health technology assessment and economic evaluation, enabling choices among alternative therapeutical paths or procedures with different clinical and economic outcomes. GRHTA is a unique journal having three different editorial boards who focus on their respective geographical expertise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书