Giovanni Corso, Carlo La Vecchia, Andrea Polizzi, Francesca Magnoni, Giuliarianna Abruzzese, Susanna Di Silvestre, Filippo Pesapane, Luca Nicosia, Giorgio Bogani, Mattia Intra, Paolo Veronesi, Viviana Galimberti
{"title":"Frequency of bilateral prophylactic and contra-lateral risk-reducing mastectomies in women with germline PALB2 variants.","authors":"Giovanni Corso, Carlo La Vecchia, Andrea Polizzi, Francesca Magnoni, Giuliarianna Abruzzese, Susanna Di Silvestre, Filippo Pesapane, Luca Nicosia, Giorgio Bogani, Mattia Intra, Paolo Veronesi, Viviana Galimberti","doi":"10.1007/s10689-026-00554-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Germline PALB2 variants confer a moderate/high-risk for breast cancer (BC). Recent reports described an increasing attention in suggesting bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM), for healthy carriers, or contraleral risk-reducing mastectomy (CRRM) and/or therapeutic mastectomy for women with BC. In this study, we aimed to calculate systematically the overall number of these procedures reported in literature. We revised all articles using systematic research through the PUBMED database. Overall numbers, frequencies, geographic distribution, family history, and post-operative histopathological analysis of BPM or CRRM were the main outcomes considered. Among 51 studies, 10 articles fulfilled our aim. All BPM or CRRM were performed in North America. One-hundred and forty-two (6.6%) were PALB2 positive, from 2,135 tested women; a total of 84 women were treated, 35 (41.7%) were healthy carriers and 49 (58.3%) received a CRRM for a previous or contextual diagnosis of BC, respectively. A positive family history was reported in 80% of these groups, and a post-operative tumor was identified in 2.6% of breast specimens. In conclusion, very few studies are reported, only in North America, but about of 2/3 (~ 60%) of the screened women received BPM or CRRM, with a high familial history for BC and a low detection rate of tumor in breast post-operative specimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":12336,"journal":{"name":"Familial Cancer","volume":"25 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Familial Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-026-00554-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Germline PALB2 variants confer a moderate/high-risk for breast cancer (BC). Recent reports described an increasing attention in suggesting bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM), for healthy carriers, or contraleral risk-reducing mastectomy (CRRM) and/or therapeutic mastectomy for women with BC. In this study, we aimed to calculate systematically the overall number of these procedures reported in literature. We revised all articles using systematic research through the PUBMED database. Overall numbers, frequencies, geographic distribution, family history, and post-operative histopathological analysis of BPM or CRRM were the main outcomes considered. Among 51 studies, 10 articles fulfilled our aim. All BPM or CRRM were performed in North America. One-hundred and forty-two (6.6%) were PALB2 positive, from 2,135 tested women; a total of 84 women were treated, 35 (41.7%) were healthy carriers and 49 (58.3%) received a CRRM for a previous or contextual diagnosis of BC, respectively. A positive family history was reported in 80% of these groups, and a post-operative tumor was identified in 2.6% of breast specimens. In conclusion, very few studies are reported, only in North America, but about of 2/3 (~ 60%) of the screened women received BPM or CRRM, with a high familial history for BC and a low detection rate of tumor in breast post-operative specimens.
期刊介绍:
In recent years clinical cancer genetics has become increasingly important. Several events, in particular the developments in DNA-based technology, have contributed to this evolution. Clinical cancer genetics has now matured to a medical discipline which is truly multidisciplinary in which clinical and molecular geneticists work together with clinical and medical oncologists as well as with psycho-social workers.
Due to the multidisciplinary nature of clinical cancer genetics most papers are currently being published in a wide variety of journals on epidemiology, oncology and genetics. Familial Cancer provides a forum bringing these topics together focusing on the interests and needs of the clinician.
The journal mainly concentrates on clinical cancer genetics. Most major areas in the field shall be included, such as epidemiology of familial cancer, molecular analysis and diagnosis, clinical expression, treatment and prevention, counselling and the health economics of familial cancer.