{"title":"Antimicrobial resistance as an economic externality: optimal control, Pigouvian taxation, and governance implications.","authors":"Aritra Jana, Debnarayan Khatua, Santi M Mandal","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2026.2659620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major concern worldwide, with serious implications for health and the economy. Global burden estimates, coupled with mortality projections for 2019, indicate that antimicrobial-resistant infections will cause large-scale deaths and massive economic losses by 2050. AMR is not only about health; It is an economic externality created by misaligned incentives in health, agriculture, and trade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present a dynamic endogenous model that captures the interplay among antibiotic use, resistance evolution, and social costs. Optimal fiscal interventions are identified and evaluated using simulation scenarios based on European data, with particular attention to the impact of diverting tax revenue to stewardship and diagnostics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The models demonstrate that, under optimal social conditions, antibiotic use should be reduced by 8.6% relative to private use levels. The combination of around <math><mrow><mrow><mi>$</mi></mrow></mrow><mn>0.775</mn></math> per dose with the Pigouvian tax can be used as a diagnostic and stewardship investment to adjust incentives and build public health power.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study makes a distinct contribution by explicitly incorporating revenue recycling into a dynamic Pigouvian framework, thereby supporting the idea that self-governance benefits from AMR taxation. The solution is then coordinated toward long-term economic planning with intervention in biomedicine against AMR.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2026.2659620","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major concern worldwide, with serious implications for health and the economy. Global burden estimates, coupled with mortality projections for 2019, indicate that antimicrobial-resistant infections will cause large-scale deaths and massive economic losses by 2050. AMR is not only about health; It is an economic externality created by misaligned incentives in health, agriculture, and trade.
Methods: We present a dynamic endogenous model that captures the interplay among antibiotic use, resistance evolution, and social costs. Optimal fiscal interventions are identified and evaluated using simulation scenarios based on European data, with particular attention to the impact of diverting tax revenue to stewardship and diagnostics.
Results: The models demonstrate that, under optimal social conditions, antibiotic use should be reduced by 8.6% relative to private use levels. The combination of around per dose with the Pigouvian tax can be used as a diagnostic and stewardship investment to adjust incentives and build public health power.
Conclusion: The study makes a distinct contribution by explicitly incorporating revenue recycling into a dynamic Pigouvian framework, thereby supporting the idea that self-governance benefits from AMR taxation. The solution is then coordinated toward long-term economic planning with intervention in biomedicine against AMR.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review.
The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections:
Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.