Antimicrobial resistance as an economic externality: optimal control, Pigouvian taxation, and governance implications.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Aritra Jana, Debnarayan Khatua, Santi M Mandal
{"title":"Antimicrobial resistance as an economic externality: optimal control, Pigouvian taxation, and governance implications.","authors":"Aritra Jana, Debnarayan Khatua, Santi M Mandal","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2026.2659620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major concern worldwide, with serious implications for health and the economy. Global burden estimates, coupled with mortality projections for 2019, indicate that antimicrobial-resistant infections will cause large-scale deaths and massive economic losses by 2050. AMR is not only about health; It is an economic externality created by misaligned incentives in health, agriculture, and trade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present a dynamic endogenous model that captures the interplay among antibiotic use, resistance evolution, and social costs. Optimal fiscal interventions are identified and evaluated using simulation scenarios based on European data, with particular attention to the impact of diverting tax revenue to stewardship and diagnostics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The models demonstrate that, under optimal social conditions, antibiotic use should be reduced by 8.6% relative to private use levels. The combination of around <math><mrow><mrow><mi>$</mi></mrow></mrow><mn>0.775</mn></math> per dose with the Pigouvian tax can be used as a diagnostic and stewardship investment to adjust incentives and build public health power.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study makes a distinct contribution by explicitly incorporating revenue recycling into a dynamic Pigouvian framework, thereby supporting the idea that self-governance benefits from AMR taxation. The solution is then coordinated toward long-term economic planning with intervention in biomedicine against AMR.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2026.2659620","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major concern worldwide, with serious implications for health and the economy. Global burden estimates, coupled with mortality projections for 2019, indicate that antimicrobial-resistant infections will cause large-scale deaths and massive economic losses by 2050. AMR is not only about health; It is an economic externality created by misaligned incentives in health, agriculture, and trade.

Methods: We present a dynamic endogenous model that captures the interplay among antibiotic use, resistance evolution, and social costs. Optimal fiscal interventions are identified and evaluated using simulation scenarios based on European data, with particular attention to the impact of diverting tax revenue to stewardship and diagnostics.

Results: The models demonstrate that, under optimal social conditions, antibiotic use should be reduced by 8.6% relative to private use levels. The combination of around $0.775 per dose with the Pigouvian tax can be used as a diagnostic and stewardship investment to adjust incentives and build public health power.

Conclusion: The study makes a distinct contribution by explicitly incorporating revenue recycling into a dynamic Pigouvian framework, thereby supporting the idea that self-governance benefits from AMR taxation. The solution is then coordinated toward long-term economic planning with intervention in biomedicine against AMR.

抗微生物药物耐药性作为一种经济外部性:最优控制、庇古税和治理影响。
背景:抗菌素耐药性(AMR)的上升是全世界关注的一个主要问题,对健康和经济产生严重影响。全球负担估计数以及2019年的死亡率预测表明,到2050年,抗微生物药物耐药性感染将造成大规模死亡和巨额经济损失。抗微生物药物耐药性不仅关乎健康;这是一种经济外部性,由卫生、农业和贸易方面的不一致的激励措施造成。方法:我们提出了一个动态的内源性模型,捕捉抗生素使用,耐药性进化和社会成本之间的相互作用。利用基于欧洲数据的模拟情景确定和评估最佳财政干预措施,特别关注将税收收入转移到管理和诊断方面的影响。结果:模型表明,在最优的社会条件下,抗生素的使用相对于私人使用水平应减少8.6%。每剂约0.775美元加上庇古税,可以用作诊断和管理投资,以调整激励措施和建立公共卫生权力。结论:该研究通过明确地将收入再循环纳入动态庇古框架,从而支持自我治理受益于AMR税收的观点,做出了独特的贡献。然后,解决方案与长期经济规划相协调,并在生物医学方面进行干预,以对抗抗生素耐药性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书