Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Sweden: A Scoping Review and Policy Landscape Analysis.

IF 7.4 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Diabetes technology & therapeutics Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-14 DOI:10.1177/15209156261442987
Johan Jendle, Peter Adolfsson, Jarl Hellman, Boris Klanger, Neda Rajamand Ekberg
{"title":"Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Sweden: A Scoping Review and Policy Landscape Analysis.","authors":"Johan Jendle, Peter Adolfsson, Jarl Hellman, Boris Klanger, Neda Rajamand Ekberg","doi":"10.1177/15209156261442987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is one of the most common chronic diseases in Sweden. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is an increasingly important alternative to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), particularly for people receiving insulin.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To summarize the evidence for CGM in insulin-treated T2DM and conduct a policy landscape analysis of national and local guidelines to explore access to CGM in Sweden relative to other countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted to identify evidence on the clinical, patient, and economic value of CGM, supplemented with searches of Swedish and European guidelines. Current recommendations for CGM in T2DM in Sweden were compared with European-wide and country-specific recommendations. Regional recommendations and funding processes within Sweden were reviewed to examine heterogeneity in local access to CGM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across international and Swedish studies, CGM was associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with SMBG, both for people with intensive insulin-treated T2DM and those on basal insulin only. The clinical benefits likely translate into fewer long-term diabetes complications and reduced resource utilization and budget impact versus SMBG. Health economic evaluations show that CGM can be considered a cost-effective intervention for all individuals treated with insulin in Sweden. European-wide guidance supports consideration of CGM for all insulin-treated individuals, but access in Sweden remains limited outside of the high-risk intensive insulin-treated population. This is exacerbated by regional heterogeneity in access, which partly stems from the attribution of budget responsibility to individual primary care units.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The benefits associated with CGM show that an expansion of the Swedish recommendations to cover all insulin-treated people with T2DM is warranted. Persistent regional disparities must be addressed to ensure equitable access to care for people with T2DM in Sweden. The establishment of dedicated funding mechanisms within primary care should be considered to promote more equitable and sustainable access.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"1007-1024"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15209156261442987","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is one of the most common chronic diseases in Sweden. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is an increasingly important alternative to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), particularly for people receiving insulin.

Objectives: To summarize the evidence for CGM in insulin-treated T2DM and conduct a policy landscape analysis of national and local guidelines to explore access to CGM in Sweden relative to other countries.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted to identify evidence on the clinical, patient, and economic value of CGM, supplemented with searches of Swedish and European guidelines. Current recommendations for CGM in T2DM in Sweden were compared with European-wide and country-specific recommendations. Regional recommendations and funding processes within Sweden were reviewed to examine heterogeneity in local access to CGM.

Results: Across international and Swedish studies, CGM was associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with SMBG, both for people with intensive insulin-treated T2DM and those on basal insulin only. The clinical benefits likely translate into fewer long-term diabetes complications and reduced resource utilization and budget impact versus SMBG. Health economic evaluations show that CGM can be considered a cost-effective intervention for all individuals treated with insulin in Sweden. European-wide guidance supports consideration of CGM for all insulin-treated individuals, but access in Sweden remains limited outside of the high-risk intensive insulin-treated population. This is exacerbated by regional heterogeneity in access, which partly stems from the attribution of budget responsibility to individual primary care units.

Conclusions: The benefits associated with CGM show that an expansion of the Swedish recommendations to cover all insulin-treated people with T2DM is warranted. Persistent regional disparities must be addressed to ensure equitable access to care for people with T2DM in Sweden. The establishment of dedicated funding mechanisms within primary care should be considered to promote more equitable and sustainable access.

瑞典胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者持续血糖监测:范围回顾和政策景观分析
背景:2型糖尿病(T2DM)是瑞典最常见的慢性疾病之一。连续血糖监测(CGM)是一种越来越重要的替代自我监测血糖(SMBG),特别是对接受胰岛素治疗的人。目的:总结胰岛素治疗T2DM患者使用CGM的证据,并对国家和地方指南进行政策景观分析,以探索瑞典相对于其他国家使用CGM的途径。方法:进行范围综述,以确定CGM的临床、患者和经济价值的证据,并辅以瑞典和欧洲指南的检索。目前瑞典T2DM患者的CGM建议与欧洲范围内和各国的建议进行了比较。审查了瑞典境内的区域建议和供资进程,以审查当地获得CGM的异质性。结果:在国际和瑞典的研究中,无论是强化胰岛素治疗的T2DM患者还是仅基础胰岛素治疗的T2DM患者,与SMBG相比,CGM与改善的临床结果相关。与SMBG相比,临床益处可能转化为更少的长期糖尿病并发症,减少资源利用和预算影响。卫生经济评价表明,在瑞典,对所有接受胰岛素治疗的人来说,CGM可被认为是一种具有成本效益的干预措施。全欧洲范围的指南支持考虑对所有接受胰岛素治疗的个体进行CGM,但在瑞典,除高危强化胰岛素治疗人群外,获得CGM的机会仍然有限。这种情况由于获得医疗服务的地区差异而加剧,这在一定程度上源于将预算责任归咎于各个初级保健单位。结论:与CGM相关的益处表明,瑞典将推荐范围扩大到所有胰岛素治疗的T2DM患者是有必要的。必须解决持续存在的地区差异,以确保瑞典2型糖尿病患者公平获得护理。应考虑在初级保健内建立专门的筹资机制,以促进更公平和可持续的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书