Blood eosinophil count as a biomarker for therapy guidance in COPD and asthma exacerbations.

IF 4.5 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Breathe Pub Date : 2026-04-14 eCollection Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.1183/20734735.0329-2025
Anuradha Nalika Godallage, Dil Afrose, Melika Valizadeh, Augusta Beech, Jens-Ulrik S Jensen, Pradeesh Sivapalan
{"title":"Blood eosinophil count as a biomarker for therapy guidance in COPD and asthma exacerbations.","authors":"Anuradha Nalika Godallage, Dil Afrose, Melika Valizadeh, Augusta Beech, Jens-Ulrik S Jensen, Pradeesh Sivapalan","doi":"10.1183/20734735.0329-2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This Journal club evaluates recent evidence on the role of blood eosinophil count (BEC) as a biomarker to guide therapy in patients with acute exacerbations of COPD and asthma. The review focuses on three studies with different methodological approaches: a biomarker-directed corticosteroid trial (Bafadhel <i>et al</i>., 2012), an acute biologic therapy trial using benralizumab (ABRA, 2025) and a long-term biologic therapy trial using mepolizumab (COPD-HELP, 2025). The biomarker-directed corticosteroid study demonstrated non-inferior symptom improvement while reducing steroid exposure, highlighting the potential to personalise therapy based on BEC. The ABRA trial showed that a single injection of benralizumab reduced treatment failure, prolonged time to exacerbation and improved symptom scores in patients with high eosinophils. By contrast, the COPD-HELP trial found no significant effect of mepolizumab on readmission or mortality, despite substantial eosinophil reduction. Limitations include small sample sizes, heterogeneous populations and reliance on surrogate end-points in some studies. These findings support the use of BEC-guided therapy in acute settings but suggest that long-term biologic treatment post-exacerbation may not improve hard outcomes. Future research should focus on precision medicine strategies targeting eosinophilic exacerbations and identifying patient subgroups who benefit most from biomarker-guided interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9292,"journal":{"name":"Breathe","volume":"22 2","pages":"250329"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13077450/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breathe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/20734735.0329-2025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This Journal club evaluates recent evidence on the role of blood eosinophil count (BEC) as a biomarker to guide therapy in patients with acute exacerbations of COPD and asthma. The review focuses on three studies with different methodological approaches: a biomarker-directed corticosteroid trial (Bafadhel et al., 2012), an acute biologic therapy trial using benralizumab (ABRA, 2025) and a long-term biologic therapy trial using mepolizumab (COPD-HELP, 2025). The biomarker-directed corticosteroid study demonstrated non-inferior symptom improvement while reducing steroid exposure, highlighting the potential to personalise therapy based on BEC. The ABRA trial showed that a single injection of benralizumab reduced treatment failure, prolonged time to exacerbation and improved symptom scores in patients with high eosinophils. By contrast, the COPD-HELP trial found no significant effect of mepolizumab on readmission or mortality, despite substantial eosinophil reduction. Limitations include small sample sizes, heterogeneous populations and reliance on surrogate end-points in some studies. These findings support the use of BEC-guided therapy in acute settings but suggest that long-term biologic treatment post-exacerbation may not improve hard outcomes. Future research should focus on precision medicine strategies targeting eosinophilic exacerbations and identifying patient subgroups who benefit most from biomarker-guided interventions.

血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数作为COPD和哮喘加重治疗指导的生物标志物。
本杂志俱乐部评估了血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数(BEC)作为指导COPD和哮喘急性加重患者治疗的生物标志物的作用的最新证据。该综述重点关注了三项采用不同方法的研究:一项生物标志物导向的皮质类固醇试验(Bafadhel等人,2012),一项使用benralizumab的急性生物治疗试验(ABRA, 2025)和一项使用mepolizumab的长期生物治疗试验(COPD-HELP, 2025)。生物标志物导向的皮质类固醇研究表明,在减少类固醇暴露的同时,非劣等症状得到改善,强调了基于BEC的个性化治疗的潜力。ABRA试验表明,单次注射benralizumab可减少高嗜酸性粒细胞患者的治疗失败,延长恶化时间并改善症状评分。相比之下,COPD-HELP试验发现mepolizumab对再入院或死亡率没有显著影响,尽管大量嗜酸性粒细胞减少。局限性包括样本量小、人群异质性和一些研究依赖替代终点。这些发现支持在急性环境中使用bec引导治疗,但表明急性加重后的长期生物治疗可能不会改善硬结果。未来的研究应侧重于针对嗜酸性粒细胞加重的精准医学策略,并确定从生物标志物引导干预中获益最多的患者亚组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Breathe
Breathe RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书