Repeated Use of Emergency Departments for Nontraumatic Dental Conditions: Factors Associated With Being a Superutilizer

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology Pub Date : 2026-07-31 Epub Date: 2026-04-14 DOI:10.1111/cdoe.70060
Morgan Santoro, Lisa J. Heaton, Adrianna C. Sonnek, Rebecca A. Preston, John J. O'Malley, Eric P. Tranby
{"title":"Repeated Use of Emergency Departments for Nontraumatic Dental Conditions: Factors Associated With Being a Superutilizer","authors":"Morgan Santoro,&nbsp;Lisa J. Heaton,&nbsp;Adrianna C. Sonnek,&nbsp;Rebecca A. Preston,&nbsp;John J. O'Malley,&nbsp;Eric P. Tranby","doi":"10.1111/cdoe.70060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Due to inadequate access to regular, affordable dental care, many patients turn to emergency departments (EDs) for the treatment of nontraumatic dental conditions (NTDCs). NTDC ED visits are a large burden on the U.S. healthcare system, with over 1.3 million visits each year and over $1 billion in associated charges. This study examines the characteristics of ED visitors and superutilizers (4+ ED visits in a calendar year) for non-dental (general) and dental reasons; investigates the cost of care for ED visitors and superutilizers; and estimates associations between patient characteristics and the likelihood of superutilization.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data obtained from the State Emergency Department Databases was used to summarise trends in visits by general and dental ED visitors and superutilizers, including visit rates and costs, across 14 states and 5 years. Logistic regression models were developed to estimate the likelihood of being dental superutilizers and superutilizers (for dental and non-dental visits) based on the characteristics of their first ED visit (age, gender, race/ethnicity, income quartile, insurance type, presence of comorbidities and state in which ED visit occurred).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the total number of ED visitors (<i>N</i> = 25 905 031), the majority (92.4%) were general (non-dental) visitors; 6.4% were general superutilizers; 1.2% were dental visitors; and less than 1% (<i>n</i> = 2617) were dental superutilizers; dental superutilizers made up 0.2% of all superutilizers. Individuals who sought ED care for dental or non-dental reasons four or more times in a year were more likely to be white, be in the second or third quartile in terms of income, and have insurance coverage through Medicaid, other dental insurance, or to be uninsured. Finally, mean and median treatment costs for general and dental superutilizers were considerably higher than for both general and dental visitors to the ED.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Individuals seeking ED care for NTDCs four or more times in a year are more likely to be white, have insurance coverage through Medicaid, Medicare or to be uninsured, and have one or more medical comorbidities. Cost of care for superutilizers is also considerably higher than for other ED visitors. Expansion of dental services for adults, particularly those on Medicaid, is needed to ensure they can access timely preventative and restorative services and avoid the burden of dental crisis requiring a visit to the ED.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10580,"journal":{"name":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","volume":"54 4","pages":"436-446"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cdoe.70060","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cdoe.70060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Due to inadequate access to regular, affordable dental care, many patients turn to emergency departments (EDs) for the treatment of nontraumatic dental conditions (NTDCs). NTDC ED visits are a large burden on the U.S. healthcare system, with over 1.3 million visits each year and over $1 billion in associated charges. This study examines the characteristics of ED visitors and superutilizers (4+ ED visits in a calendar year) for non-dental (general) and dental reasons; investigates the cost of care for ED visitors and superutilizers; and estimates associations between patient characteristics and the likelihood of superutilization.

Methods

Data obtained from the State Emergency Department Databases was used to summarise trends in visits by general and dental ED visitors and superutilizers, including visit rates and costs, across 14 states and 5 years. Logistic regression models were developed to estimate the likelihood of being dental superutilizers and superutilizers (for dental and non-dental visits) based on the characteristics of their first ED visit (age, gender, race/ethnicity, income quartile, insurance type, presence of comorbidities and state in which ED visit occurred).

Results

Of the total number of ED visitors (N = 25 905 031), the majority (92.4%) were general (non-dental) visitors; 6.4% were general superutilizers; 1.2% were dental visitors; and less than 1% (n = 2617) were dental superutilizers; dental superutilizers made up 0.2% of all superutilizers. Individuals who sought ED care for dental or non-dental reasons four or more times in a year were more likely to be white, be in the second or third quartile in terms of income, and have insurance coverage through Medicaid, other dental insurance, or to be uninsured. Finally, mean and median treatment costs for general and dental superutilizers were considerably higher than for both general and dental visitors to the ED.

Discussion

Individuals seeking ED care for NTDCs four or more times in a year are more likely to be white, have insurance coverage through Medicaid, Medicare or to be uninsured, and have one or more medical comorbidities. Cost of care for superutilizers is also considerably higher than for other ED visitors. Expansion of dental services for adults, particularly those on Medicaid, is needed to ensure they can access timely preventative and restorative services and avoid the burden of dental crisis requiring a visit to the ED.

非创伤性牙病反复使用急诊科:成为超级利用者的相关因素
背景:由于无法获得常规的、负担得起的牙科护理,许多患者转向急诊科(EDs)寻求非创伤性牙科疾病(ntdc)的治疗。NTDC急诊科就诊是美国医疗保健系统的一大负担,每年有超过130万人次就诊,相关费用超过10亿美元。本研究调查了非牙科(一般)和牙科原因的急诊科访客和过度利用者(一年内4次以上)的特征;调查急诊科访客和过度使用者的护理费用;并估计患者特征与过度使用可能性之间的关联。方法:从国家急诊科数据库获得的数据用于总结14个州和5年的普通和牙科急诊科访客和超利用者的访问趋势,包括访问率和费用。建立了Logistic回归模型,根据患者第一次急诊科就诊的特征(年龄、性别、种族/民族、收入四分位数、保险类型、合并症的存在和急诊科就诊的州)来估计成为牙科超级利用者和牙科超级利用者(用于牙科和非牙科就诊)的可能性。结果:急诊科就诊总人数(N = 25 905 031)中,以普通(非牙科)就诊为主(92.4%);6.4%为一般超利用者;1.2%为牙科访客;不到1% (n = 2617)是牙科超级利用者;牙科滥用者占所有滥用者的0.2%。在一年中因牙科或非牙科原因寻求ED治疗四次或四次以上的人更有可能是白人,在收入方面处于第二或第三四分之一,通过医疗补助计划或其他牙科保险获得保险,或者没有保险。最后,普通门诊和牙科门诊的平均和中位数治疗费用明显高于普通门诊和牙科门诊。讨论:每年因ntdc寻求四次或四次以上急诊科治疗的人更有可能是白人,通过医疗补助计划、医疗保险或没有保险,并且有一种或多种医疗合并症。过度吸毒者的护理费用也比其他急诊科来访者高得多。需要扩大成人牙科服务,特别是那些享受医疗补助的人,以确保他们能够及时获得预防性和恢复性服务,避免需要去急诊室就诊的牙科危机负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology is to serve as a forum for scientifically based information in community dentistry, with the intention of continually expanding the knowledge base in the field. The scope is therefore broad, ranging from original studies in epidemiology, behavioral sciences related to dentistry, and health services research through to methodological reports in program planning, implementation and evaluation. Reports dealing with people of all age groups are welcome. The journal encourages manuscripts which present methodologically detailed scientific research findings from original data collection or analysis of existing databases. Preference is given to new findings. Confirmations of previous findings can be of value, but the journal seeks to avoid needless repetition. It also encourages thoughtful, provocative commentaries on subjects ranging from research methods to public policies. Purely descriptive reports are not encouraged, nor are behavioral science reports with only marginal application to dentistry. The journal is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书