Jason M Aubrey, Apoorva Ojha, Matthew J Morris, Hannah R Liefeld, Aryana M Sharrak-Sitto, Lindsay E Burdett, Cathryn L Chadwick, Mathew Chung, G Paul Wright
{"title":"Bedside Exploratory Laparotomy: Factors Associated With Mortality and Clinical Implications in Critically - Ill Patients.","authors":"Jason M Aubrey, Apoorva Ojha, Matthew J Morris, Hannah R Liefeld, Aryana M Sharrak-Sitto, Lindsay E Burdett, Cathryn L Chadwick, Mathew Chung, G Paul Wright","doi":"10.1177/00031348261443341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bedside exploratory laparotomy is a heroic intervention for unstable patients who cannot be transported to the operating room. Given a previously documented high mortality rate, some argue against the procedure on assumption of non-beneficence. This study aims to evaluate procedural mortality rate and identify physiologic factors associated with death after bedside exploration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent bedside exploratory laparotomy between 2019 and 2024 was conducted. Patients were stratified into cohorts based on a composite outcome of in-hospital or 30-day survival, and an analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 51 patients underwent bedside exploratory laparotomy, with a mortality rate of 82.4% (42/51) within 30 days or during index hospitalization. The median postoperative time to death was 18.1 hours. Mortality rates were 73.9% in SICU, 90.0% in MICU, and 88.2% in CTICU. Survivors were younger than non-survivors (46.5 vs. 60.8 years; p = 0.025) and had lower Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (2 vs. 4; p = 0.0011). Preoperative lactate was lower (4.12 vs. 10.16 mmol/L; p = 0.0012) and pH higher (7.30 vs. 7.20; p = 0.042) in survivors. Significant intraoperative findings were more frequent in non-survivors (95% vs. 33%; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bedside exploratory laparotomy is a last-resort intervention with exceedingly high mortality. We observed older patients with significant acidosis or identifiable intraoperative findings have worse prognoses. Preoperative goals-of-care discussions should be prioritized in elderly patients before proceeding with bedside exploration to ensure ethical delivery of surgical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"2700-2706"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348261443341","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Bedside exploratory laparotomy is a heroic intervention for unstable patients who cannot be transported to the operating room. Given a previously documented high mortality rate, some argue against the procedure on assumption of non-beneficence. This study aims to evaluate procedural mortality rate and identify physiologic factors associated with death after bedside exploration.
Methods: A single-center, retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent bedside exploratory laparotomy between 2019 and 2024 was conducted. Patients were stratified into cohorts based on a composite outcome of in-hospital or 30-day survival, and an analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with mortality.
Results: A total of 51 patients underwent bedside exploratory laparotomy, with a mortality rate of 82.4% (42/51) within 30 days or during index hospitalization. The median postoperative time to death was 18.1 hours. Mortality rates were 73.9% in SICU, 90.0% in MICU, and 88.2% in CTICU. Survivors were younger than non-survivors (46.5 vs. 60.8 years; p = 0.025) and had lower Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (2 vs. 4; p = 0.0011). Preoperative lactate was lower (4.12 vs. 10.16 mmol/L; p = 0.0012) and pH higher (7.30 vs. 7.20; p = 0.042) in survivors. Significant intraoperative findings were more frequent in non-survivors (95% vs. 33%; p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Bedside exploratory laparotomy is a last-resort intervention with exceedingly high mortality. We observed older patients with significant acidosis or identifiable intraoperative findings have worse prognoses. Preoperative goals-of-care discussions should be prioritized in elderly patients before proceeding with bedside exploration to ensure ethical delivery of surgical care.
背景:床边探查剖腹手术是一种英勇的干预不稳定的病人谁不能转移到手术室。鉴于先前记录的高死亡率,一些人反对假设非受益人的程序。本研究旨在评估床边探查后的程序性死亡率,并确定与死亡相关的生理因素。方法:对2019年至2024年间连续行床边探查性剖腹手术的患者进行单中心回顾性分析。根据住院或30天生存率的综合结果将患者分层成队列,并进行分析以确定与死亡率相关的因素。结果:51例患者行床边剖腹探查术,30天内或指数住院期间死亡率为82.4%(42/51)。术后中位死亡时间为18.1小时。SICU病死率为73.9%,MICU为90.0%,CTICU为88.2%。幸存者比非幸存者年轻(46.5岁对60.8岁,p = 0.025), Charlson合并症指数评分较低(2比4,p = 0.0011)。幸存者术前乳酸较低(4.12 vs. 10.16 mmol/L, p = 0.0012), pH较高(7.30 vs. 7.20, p = 0.042)。术中重大发现在非幸存者中更为常见(95% vs 33%; p < 0.001)。结论:床边剖腹探查术是死亡率极高的最后手段。我们观察到有明显酸中毒或术中发现的老年患者预后较差。在进行床边探查之前,应优先考虑老年患者的术前护理目标讨论,以确保手术护理的道德交付。
期刊介绍:
The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.