Comparison of biplanar- with 3D-vena contracta and vena contracta area for the assessment of tricuspid valve regurgitation by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Rajni Singh, Massimiliano Meineri, Waseem Zakhary, Sophia Sgouropoulou, Joerg Ender, Anna Flo Forner
{"title":"Comparison of biplanar- with 3D-vena contracta and vena contracta area for the assessment of tricuspid valve regurgitation by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography.","authors":"Rajni Singh, Massimiliano Meineri, Waseem Zakhary, Sophia Sgouropoulou, Joerg Ender, Anna Flo Forner","doi":"10.21037/acs-2025-1-72-tvd","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is often incidentally detected at intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), resulting in possible changes in the surgical plan. The aim of this study was to compare 2D and 3D measurements of TR vena contracta width (VCW) and the degree of TR severity using TEE from the three standard mid-esophageal (ME) views.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective observational study, we analyzed 3D and 2D TEE datasets from 30 adult patients undergoing elective tricuspid valve (TV) repair. 2D and 3D TEE color flow Doppler (CFD) loops of the TV in the three standard ME views (4Chamber, RV inflow-outflow (inflow) and modified bicaval) were recorded immediately after induction of anesthesia. VCW from single views and the average of the measurement of biplane VCW (2D biplane VCW) from each standard view were compared with the maximum and minimum diameters of the 3D vena contracta area (VCA) and their average (3D average VCW). TR severity classification was compared between 2D biplane VCW and 3D average VCW and VCA. Correlation between measurements was analyzed using Pearson coefficient and agreement assessed using the Bland-Altman method. Cohen's Kappa correlation was used to assess TR severity concordance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Biplane VCW in all three ME views underestimated 3D average VCW measurement, with VCW from ME inflow view showing the best agreement. VCW measurements in single standard views systematically underestimated the maximum 3D VCA diameter. We detected very good agreement in TR grading between 3D average VCW and 3D VCA, and an underestimation by 2D biplane VCW (moderate agreement for inflow and fair for the other views). Intra- and inter-observer correlation when repeating 2D measurements was more reliable than that for 3D measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study shows that 2D biplane VCW from the ME inflow view best agrees with 3D average VCW and allows the most accurate classification of TR severity compared to 3D average VCW.</p>","PeriodicalId":8067,"journal":{"name":"Annals of cardiothoracic surgery","volume":"15 2","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13077614/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of cardiothoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/acs-2025-1-72-tvd","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is often incidentally detected at intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), resulting in possible changes in the surgical plan. The aim of this study was to compare 2D and 3D measurements of TR vena contracta width (VCW) and the degree of TR severity using TEE from the three standard mid-esophageal (ME) views.

Methods: In a prospective observational study, we analyzed 3D and 2D TEE datasets from 30 adult patients undergoing elective tricuspid valve (TV) repair. 2D and 3D TEE color flow Doppler (CFD) loops of the TV in the three standard ME views (4Chamber, RV inflow-outflow (inflow) and modified bicaval) were recorded immediately after induction of anesthesia. VCW from single views and the average of the measurement of biplane VCW (2D biplane VCW) from each standard view were compared with the maximum and minimum diameters of the 3D vena contracta area (VCA) and their average (3D average VCW). TR severity classification was compared between 2D biplane VCW and 3D average VCW and VCA. Correlation between measurements was analyzed using Pearson coefficient and agreement assessed using the Bland-Altman method. Cohen's Kappa correlation was used to assess TR severity concordance.

Results: Biplane VCW in all three ME views underestimated 3D average VCW measurement, with VCW from ME inflow view showing the best agreement. VCW measurements in single standard views systematically underestimated the maximum 3D VCA diameter. We detected very good agreement in TR grading between 3D average VCW and 3D VCA, and an underestimation by 2D biplane VCW (moderate agreement for inflow and fair for the other views). Intra- and inter-observer correlation when repeating 2D measurements was more reliable than that for 3D measurements.

Conclusions: Our study shows that 2D biplane VCW from the ME inflow view best agrees with 3D average VCW and allows the most accurate classification of TR severity compared to 3D average VCW.

术中经食管超声心动图评价三尖瓣反流的双平面与3d收缩静脉及收缩静脉面积的比较。
背景:术中经食管超声心动图(TEE)经常偶然发现三尖瓣反流(TR),从而可能改变手术计划。本研究的目的是比较使用TEE从三个标准食管中位(ME)视图测量的TR静脉收缩宽度(VCW)和TR严重程度的2D和3D测量结果。方法:在一项前瞻性观察研究中,我们分析了30例接受选择性三尖瓣(TV)修复的成年患者的3D和2D TEE数据集。在麻醉诱导后立即记录电视在3个标准ME视图(4Chamber、RV流入-流出(流入)和改良双腔)的2D和3D TEE彩色血流多普勒(CFD)循环。将单视图VCW与各标准视图双平面VCW测量值的平均值(2D双平面VCW)与三维静脉收缩区(VCA)最大、最小直径及其平均值(3D平均VCW)进行比较。比较二维双平面VCW与三维平均VCW和VCA的TR严重程度分级。使用Pearson系数分析测量值之间的相关性,使用Bland-Altman方法评估一致性。采用Cohen’s Kappa相关评估TR严重程度一致性。结果:所有三个ME视图的双翼VCW都低估了3D平均VCW测量,与ME流入视图的VCW显示出最好的一致性。VCW测量在单一标准视图系统低估了最大的三维VCA直径。我们发现3D平均VCW和3D VCA之间的TR分级非常一致,2D双翼VCW低估了(流入的一致性中等,其他视图的一致性一般)。当重复二维测量时,观察者内部和观察者之间的相关性比三维测量更可靠。结论:我们的研究表明,与3D平均VCW相比,来自ME流入视图的2D双翼VCW与3D平均VCW最吻合,并且可以最准确地分类TR严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书