Predictors of Emergency Department Transfer Among Older Adults Seen by an Emergency Medicine Mobile Integrated Health Team.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Maura Kennedy, Sharon Pang, Melissa A Meeker, Ilianna Santangelo, Shan W Liu, Kei Ouchi, Stephen Dorner, Benjamin A White, Lauren M Nentwich, Matthew L Russell, Emily Hayden
{"title":"Predictors of Emergency Department Transfer Among Older Adults Seen by an Emergency Medicine Mobile Integrated Health Team.","authors":"Maura Kennedy, Sharon Pang, Melissa A Meeker, Ilianna Santangelo, Shan W Liu, Kei Ouchi, Stephen Dorner, Benjamin A White, Lauren M Nentwich, Matthew L Russell, Emily Hayden","doi":"10.1111/acem.70292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to describe the utilization of an emergency medicine-led mobile integrated health program, the Mobile Response Program (MRP), by older adults and identify predictors of being directed to the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational cohort study included patients 65 years and older referred to MRP between 4/2021-1/2023. Collected covariates included demographics, comorbidities, referral reasons and outcomes, and for accepted referrals number of visits, tests, treatments, and disposition. We used logistic regression to identify predictors of being referred to the ED as compared to evaluation and treatment by MRP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study, 1167 referrals were made for older adults of which 813 were accepted and received a visit, and 129 were declined and directed to the ED. Common referral reasons included shortness of breath, cough/upper respiratory infection, soft tissue infection, volume overload, urinary complaints, and confusion. Predictors of MRP declining the referral and directing patients to the ED included confusion, fall, dizziness, and failure to thrive, whereas referrals for cough had higher odds of acceptance. Among patients with an MRP visit, 19% were directed to the ED, and an additional 4% were directed to the ED but declined to go. Predictors of ED direction after MRP visits included confusion, failure to thrive, electrocardiogram performance, and nebulizer treatments; visits with COVID testing or antibiotic administration had lower odds of being directed to the ED.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among older adults referred to the MRP for acute medical needs, most were safely treated at home. Geriatric syndromes and non-specific complaints were associated with greater odds of being directed to the ED from the original referral and after MRP evaluation. These findings can help improve the design of these programs to meet the needs of older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":"33 4","pages":"e70292"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.70292","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to describe the utilization of an emergency medicine-led mobile integrated health program, the Mobile Response Program (MRP), by older adults and identify predictors of being directed to the emergency department (ED).

Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study included patients 65 years and older referred to MRP between 4/2021-1/2023. Collected covariates included demographics, comorbidities, referral reasons and outcomes, and for accepted referrals number of visits, tests, treatments, and disposition. We used logistic regression to identify predictors of being referred to the ED as compared to evaluation and treatment by MRP.

Results: During the study, 1167 referrals were made for older adults of which 813 were accepted and received a visit, and 129 were declined and directed to the ED. Common referral reasons included shortness of breath, cough/upper respiratory infection, soft tissue infection, volume overload, urinary complaints, and confusion. Predictors of MRP declining the referral and directing patients to the ED included confusion, fall, dizziness, and failure to thrive, whereas referrals for cough had higher odds of acceptance. Among patients with an MRP visit, 19% were directed to the ED, and an additional 4% were directed to the ED but declined to go. Predictors of ED direction after MRP visits included confusion, failure to thrive, electrocardiogram performance, and nebulizer treatments; visits with COVID testing or antibiotic administration had lower odds of being directed to the ED.

Conclusions: Among older adults referred to the MRP for acute medical needs, most were safely treated at home. Geriatric syndromes and non-specific complaints were associated with greater odds of being directed to the ED from the original referral and after MRP evaluation. These findings can help improve the design of these programs to meet the needs of older adults.

由急诊医学流动综合健康小组观察的老年人急诊科转移的预测因素
目的:本研究的目的是描述老年人对急诊医学主导的移动综合健康计划,即移动响应计划(MRP)的使用情况,并确定被引导到急诊科(ED)的预测因素。方法:这项回顾性观察队列研究纳入了2021年4月至2023年1月期间接受MRP治疗的65岁及以上患者。收集的协变量包括人口统计学、合并症、转诊原因和转诊结果,以及接受转诊的次数、检查、治疗和处置。我们使用逻辑回归来确定与MRP评估和治疗相比,被称为ED的预测因素。结果:在研究期间,1167名老年人转诊,其中813名被接受并接受了就诊,129名被拒绝并被送往急诊科。常见的转诊原因包括呼吸短促、咳嗽/上呼吸道感染、软组织感染、容量过载、泌尿系统不适和意识不清。MRP拒绝转诊并引导患者到急诊科的预测因素包括精神错乱、跌倒、头晕和无法茁壮成长,而因咳嗽转诊的接受几率更高。在MRP就诊的患者中,19%的人被送到急诊科,另外4%的人被送到急诊科但拒绝去。MRP就诊后ED方向的预测因素包括精神错乱、发育不全、心电图表现和雾剂治疗;接受COVID检测或抗生素治疗的患者被送往急诊室的几率较低。结论:在因急性医疗需求而被转介到MRP的老年人中,大多数人在家中安全接受了治疗。老年综合征和非特异性主诉与从原始转诊和MRP评估后转到急诊科的几率较大相关。这些发现可以帮助改进这些项目的设计,以满足老年人的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书