Politicisation and Agricultural (Post-)Exceptionalism in EU–Mercosur Association Agreement Negotiations

IF 3.3 1区 社会学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies Pub Date : 2026-04-06 Epub Date: 2025-08-21 DOI:10.1111/jcms.70028
Emilio Del Pupo
{"title":"Politicisation and Agricultural (Post-)Exceptionalism in EU–Mercosur Association Agreement Negotiations","authors":"Emilio Del Pupo","doi":"10.1111/jcms.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines how the politicisation of EU trade policy – defined by heightened public salience, stakeholder polarisation and contestation – reshapes agricultural lobbying strategies, with a particular focus on the EU–Mercosur Association Agreement. It argues that sustainability has become a central terrain of discursive contestation, strategically mobilised by agricultural interest groups to reinforce protectionist claims under new political and regulatory conditions. Drawing on discursive postfunctionalism, the analysis traces how EU institutions, national governments and sectoral lobbies frame sustainability as a response to politicisation. Empirically, the article draws on documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews to show how agricultural actors align with broader narratives around climate change, deforestation and food safety to legitimise opposition to liberalisation. Theoretically, it contributes to the literature on EU trade policy by refining the concepts of politicisation and post-exceptionalism and foregrounding the strategic use of sustainability rhetoric in shaping trade outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51369,"journal":{"name":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","volume":"64 3","pages":"980-1000"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcms.70028","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcms.70028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines how the politicisation of EU trade policy – defined by heightened public salience, stakeholder polarisation and contestation – reshapes agricultural lobbying strategies, with a particular focus on the EU–Mercosur Association Agreement. It argues that sustainability has become a central terrain of discursive contestation, strategically mobilised by agricultural interest groups to reinforce protectionist claims under new political and regulatory conditions. Drawing on discursive postfunctionalism, the analysis traces how EU institutions, national governments and sectoral lobbies frame sustainability as a response to politicisation. Empirically, the article draws on documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews to show how agricultural actors align with broader narratives around climate change, deforestation and food safety to legitimise opposition to liberalisation. Theoretically, it contributes to the literature on EU trade policy by refining the concepts of politicisation and post-exceptionalism and foregrounding the strategic use of sustainability rhetoric in shaping trade outcomes.

欧盟-南方共同市场联系国协定谈判中的政治化与农业(后)例外主义
本文考察了欧盟贸易政策的政治化——由公众的高度关注、利益相关者的两极分化和争论所定义——如何重塑农业游说策略,并特别关注欧盟-南方共同市场联盟协议。它认为,可持续性已成为话语争论的中心领域,在新的政治和监管条件下,农业利益集团战略性地动员可持续性来强化保护主义主张。利用话语后功能主义,该分析追踪了欧盟机构、各国政府和行业游说团体如何将可持续性作为对政治化的回应。从经验上看,本文利用文献分析和半结构化访谈,展示了农业行为者如何与围绕气候变化、森林砍伐和食品安全的更广泛的叙事相一致,从而使反对自由化的声音合法化。从理论上讲,它通过细化政治化和后例外论的概念,以及在塑造贸易结果时战略性地使用可持续性修辞,为欧盟贸易政策的文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书