Hungary's Populist Government and the Contestation of EU Foreign Policy Co-Operation at the United Nations: Dogs That Bark Do Not Bite?

IF 3.3 1区 社会学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies Pub Date : 2026-04-06 Epub Date: 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1111/jcms.13706
Carla Monteleone, Patrick Müller, Tatiana Coutto
{"title":"Hungary's Populist Government and the Contestation of EU Foreign Policy Co-Operation at the United Nations: Dogs That Bark Do Not Bite?","authors":"Carla Monteleone,&nbsp;Patrick Müller,&nbsp;Tatiana Coutto","doi":"10.1111/jcms.13706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article provides an analysis of Hungary's role in EU foreign policy co-operation at the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in the period from its accession to the EU in 2004 till 2021, which involved the shift from mainstream parties to successive governments led by the populist radical right (PRR) Fidesz party. Shifting attention to norm contestation in EU foreign policy co-operation, it examines the extent to which Hungary's PRR government has contested or adapted to the EU's culture of co-operation in its UNGA voting behaviour. Our empirical analysis compares Hungary's voting record at the UNGA under the PRR government that gained power in 2010 to both previous mainstream governments in Hungary and mainstream governments in other EU member states. The article shows that populist contestation dynamics at the level of foreign policy behaviour are more limited than often assumed, whilst also pointing to the robustness of key procedural Common Foreign and Security Policy norms.</p>","PeriodicalId":51369,"journal":{"name":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","volume":"64 3","pages":"1204-1222"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcms.13706","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcms.13706","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article provides an analysis of Hungary's role in EU foreign policy co-operation at the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in the period from its accession to the EU in 2004 till 2021, which involved the shift from mainstream parties to successive governments led by the populist radical right (PRR) Fidesz party. Shifting attention to norm contestation in EU foreign policy co-operation, it examines the extent to which Hungary's PRR government has contested or adapted to the EU's culture of co-operation in its UNGA voting behaviour. Our empirical analysis compares Hungary's voting record at the UNGA under the PRR government that gained power in 2010 to both previous mainstream governments in Hungary and mainstream governments in other EU member states. The article shows that populist contestation dynamics at the level of foreign policy behaviour are more limited than often assumed, whilst also pointing to the robustness of key procedural Common Foreign and Security Policy norms.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

匈牙利民粹主义政府与欧盟外交政策合作在联合国的争论:狗叫不咬人?
本文分析了匈牙利从2004年加入欧盟到2021年在联合国大会(UNGA)期间在欧盟外交政策合作中的作用,这段时间匈牙利从主流政党过渡到由民粹主义激进右翼(PRR)青民盟(Fidesz)领导的连续政府。将注意力转移到欧盟外交政策合作中的规范争论上,它考察了匈牙利的PRR政府在其联合国大会投票行为中对欧盟合作文化的质疑或适应程度。我们的实证分析将匈牙利在2010年上台的PRR政府领导下的联合国大会投票记录与匈牙利之前的主流政府和其他欧盟成员国的主流政府进行了比较。这篇文章表明,民粹主义在外交政策行为层面的竞争动态比通常假设的更有限,同时也指出了关键的程序性共同外交和安全政策规范的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书