Assessing forest fragmentation and biodiversity impacts in sub-Saharan Africa: Methodological challenges and conservation strategies for small-scale agricultural landscapes

IF 2.1 Q3 AGRONOMY
Gillie Cheelo, Hastings Shamaoma, Charles Bwalya Chisanga, Jules Christian Zekeng, Stephen Syampungani
{"title":"Assessing forest fragmentation and biodiversity impacts in sub-Saharan Africa: Methodological challenges and conservation strategies for small-scale agricultural landscapes","authors":"Gillie Cheelo,&nbsp;Hastings Shamaoma,&nbsp;Charles Bwalya Chisanga,&nbsp;Jules Christian Zekeng,&nbsp;Stephen Syampungani","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Tropical forests in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) harbor around one-third of the world's species but are becoming more fragmented due to the expansion of human settlements and small-scale agricultural (SCA) areas. This study systematically reviewed the approaches and methods used to analyze forest fragmentation and its impact on biodiversity in SSA, with a focus on their suitability in SCA landscapes. The main findings revealed that most studies in SSA employed generalized approaches to assess fragmentation, failing to account for the distinct contributions of various land cover changes. The other key findings indicate that the majority of studies (i) depended on low-resolution remote sensing imagery, (ii) neglected to assess landscape metrics accuracy, and (iii) had limited focus on socioeconomic aspects. These limitations impede precise and thorough evaluation of SCA's contribution to forest fragmentation. To address these gaps, we recommend the following: (i) adoption of high-resolution images, (ii) integration of socioeconomic data, and (iii) rigorous validation of landscape metrics. Concerning biodiversity implications, 55.2% (21 out of 38) of the reviewed studies reported negative impacts, and 68.2% (26 out of 38) exhibited a taxonomic bias toward avian and tree/plant species. We recommend the following: (i) enhanced utilization of remote sensing data for biodiversity monitoring, (ii) greater emphasis on neglected taxa (e.g., small mammals and amphibians), and (iii) focused conservation initiatives for small forest fragments, which are essential for biodiversity conservation, and reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in SSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70349","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agg2.70349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tropical forests in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) harbor around one-third of the world's species but are becoming more fragmented due to the expansion of human settlements and small-scale agricultural (SCA) areas. This study systematically reviewed the approaches and methods used to analyze forest fragmentation and its impact on biodiversity in SSA, with a focus on their suitability in SCA landscapes. The main findings revealed that most studies in SSA employed generalized approaches to assess fragmentation, failing to account for the distinct contributions of various land cover changes. The other key findings indicate that the majority of studies (i) depended on low-resolution remote sensing imagery, (ii) neglected to assess landscape metrics accuracy, and (iii) had limited focus on socioeconomic aspects. These limitations impede precise and thorough evaluation of SCA's contribution to forest fragmentation. To address these gaps, we recommend the following: (i) adoption of high-resolution images, (ii) integration of socioeconomic data, and (iii) rigorous validation of landscape metrics. Concerning biodiversity implications, 55.2% (21 out of 38) of the reviewed studies reported negative impacts, and 68.2% (26 out of 38) exhibited a taxonomic bias toward avian and tree/plant species. We recommend the following: (i) enhanced utilization of remote sensing data for biodiversity monitoring, (ii) greater emphasis on neglected taxa (e.g., small mammals and amphibians), and (iii) focused conservation initiatives for small forest fragments, which are essential for biodiversity conservation, and reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in SSA.

Abstract Image

评估撒哈拉以南非洲森林破碎化和生物多样性影响:小规模农业景观的方法论挑战和保护战略
撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)的热带森林拥有世界上约三分之一的物种,但由于人类住区和小规模农业(SCA)地区的扩张,热带森林正变得更加分散。本文系统地综述了森林破碎化及其对生物多样性影响的研究方法,重点探讨了森林破碎化在保护区景观中的适宜性。主要研究结果表明,大多数关于土地沙漠化的研究采用了广义的方法来评估破碎化,未能考虑到各种土地覆盖变化的独特贡献。其他主要发现表明,大多数研究(i)依赖于低分辨率遥感图像,(ii)忽略了评估景观指标的准确性,以及(iii)对社会经济方面的关注有限。这些限制妨碍了对SCA对森林破碎化的贡献进行精确和彻底的评价。为了解决这些差距,我们建议:(i)采用高分辨率图像,(ii)整合社会经济数据,以及(iii)严格验证景观指标。在生物多样性影响方面,55.2%(21 / 38)的研究报告了负面影响,68.2%(26 / 38)的研究显示了对鸟类和树木/植物物种的分类偏见。我们建议:(1)加强对生物多样性监测的遥感数据利用;(2)更加重视被忽视的分类群(如小型哺乳动物和两栖动物);(3)重点保护森林小碎片,这对保护生物多样性和减少森林砍伐和森林退化所产生的排放至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书