Do Welfare Regimes Matter? A Comparative Analysis of Area-Level Inequalities in Life Expectancy in Germany and the United Kingdom, 2003–2021

IF 2.4 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Michael Mühlichen, Andreas Höhn, Nik Lomax, Petra Meier, Pavel Grigoriev
{"title":"Do Welfare Regimes Matter? A Comparative Analysis of Area-Level Inequalities in Life Expectancy in Germany and the United Kingdom, 2003–2021","authors":"Michael Mühlichen,&nbsp;Andreas Höhn,&nbsp;Nik Lomax,&nbsp;Petra Meier,&nbsp;Pavel Grigoriev","doi":"10.1111/gean.70040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While area-level inequalities in life expectancy are well documented within individual countries, cross-national comparisons remain rare. We estimated and compared the magnitude of area-level life expectancy inequalities across districts in the UK and Germany, representing two distinct welfare regimes. We used mortality data from national statistical offices to estimate life expectancy for all districts between 2003 and 2021. Based on employment data, we assigned a deprivation decile to each district within both countries and calculated life expectancy for each decile. Using the slope index of inequality, we compared temporal trends in life expectancy inequalities across deciles in both countries. We found that, although life expectancy was similar in both countries, the UK consistently showed higher levels of area-level inequality than Germany. While district-level life expectancy inequalities increased in both countries over time, they rose more sharply in the UK, particularly during the first years of the Covid-19 pandemic. These findings are likely to reflect deeply rooted differences in governmental approaches to ensuring equitable living conditions across two distinct welfare regimes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12533,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Analysis","volume":"58 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gean.70040","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographical Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gean.70040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While area-level inequalities in life expectancy are well documented within individual countries, cross-national comparisons remain rare. We estimated and compared the magnitude of area-level life expectancy inequalities across districts in the UK and Germany, representing two distinct welfare regimes. We used mortality data from national statistical offices to estimate life expectancy for all districts between 2003 and 2021. Based on employment data, we assigned a deprivation decile to each district within both countries and calculated life expectancy for each decile. Using the slope index of inequality, we compared temporal trends in life expectancy inequalities across deciles in both countries. We found that, although life expectancy was similar in both countries, the UK consistently showed higher levels of area-level inequality than Germany. While district-level life expectancy inequalities increased in both countries over time, they rose more sharply in the UK, particularly during the first years of the Covid-19 pandemic. These findings are likely to reflect deeply rooted differences in governmental approaches to ensuring equitable living conditions across two distinct welfare regimes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

福利制度重要吗?2003-2021年德国和英国地区预期寿命不平等的比较分析
虽然在个别国家内,地区一级的预期寿命不平等有充分的记录,但跨国比较仍然很少。我们估计并比较了英国和德国不同地区的预期寿命不平等程度,这两个地区代表着两种不同的福利制度。我们使用国家统计局的死亡率数据来估计2003年至2021年间所有地区的预期寿命。根据就业数据,我们为两国的每个地区分配了一个贫困十分位数,并计算了每个十分位数的预期寿命。利用不平等的斜率指数,我们比较了两国在十分位数上预期寿命不平等的时间趋势。我们发现,尽管两国的预期寿命相似,但英国一直表现出比德国更高的地区水平不平等。随着时间的推移,两国地区一级的预期寿命不平等现象有所加剧,但英国的不平等现象加剧得更为严重,尤其是在新冠肺炎大流行的头几年。这些发现可能反映了政府在确保两种不同福利制度的公平生活条件方面的根深蒂固的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: First in its specialty area and one of the most frequently cited publications in geography, Geographical Analysis has, since 1969, presented significant advances in geographical theory, model building, and quantitative methods to geographers and scholars in a wide spectrum of related fields. Traditionally, mathematical and nonmathematical articulations of geographical theory, and statements and discussions of the analytic paradigm are published in the journal. Spatial data analyses and spatial econometrics and statistics are strongly represented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书