{"title":"Ellipsoid-Based Interval-Type Uncertainty Model Updating Based on Riemannian Manifold and Gaussian Process Model","authors":"Yanhe Tao, Qintao Guo, Jin Zhou, Cheng Yi","doi":"10.1002/msd2.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Modern engineering systems require advanced uncertainty-aware model updating methods that address parameter correlations beyond conventional interval analysis. This paper proposes a novel framework integrating Riemannian manifold theory with Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) for systems governed by Symmetric Positive-Definite (SPD) matrix constraints. Our methodology features three key innovations: (1) A semi-definite programming-optimized Minimum Volume Ellipsoid model that explicitly quantifies parameter interdependencies while ensuring computational efficiency; (2) A manifold-embedded GPR surrogate model employing Log-Euclidean kernels to intrinsically preserve SPD constraints during uncertainty updating; (3) A Riemannian gradient optimization scheme that enables efficient parameter updates via logarithmic matrix mapping. Validated through mechanical and aerospace case studies, the framework achieves a Log-Euclidean distance of 3.12 × 10<sup>−4</sup> in uncertainty updating (compared to a baseline of 48.48) and provides a tenfold computational acceleration over Bayesian alternatives. Robustness tests demonstrate stable performance under 5% noise perturbation, with the Log-Euclidean distance increased only marginally to 1.41 × 10<sup>−2</sup>. By unifying differential geometry with machine learning, our approach eliminates heuristic projections required in conventional methods while advancing uncertainty quantification through structure-preserving manifold operations. This study bridges geometric consistency, computational efficiency, and physical consistency in uncertainty-aware model updating.</p>","PeriodicalId":60486,"journal":{"name":"国际机械系统动力学学报(英文)","volume":"6 1","pages":"140-152"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/msd2.70045","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"国际机械系统动力学学报(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/msd2.70045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Modern engineering systems require advanced uncertainty-aware model updating methods that address parameter correlations beyond conventional interval analysis. This paper proposes a novel framework integrating Riemannian manifold theory with Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) for systems governed by Symmetric Positive-Definite (SPD) matrix constraints. Our methodology features three key innovations: (1) A semi-definite programming-optimized Minimum Volume Ellipsoid model that explicitly quantifies parameter interdependencies while ensuring computational efficiency; (2) A manifold-embedded GPR surrogate model employing Log-Euclidean kernels to intrinsically preserve SPD constraints during uncertainty updating; (3) A Riemannian gradient optimization scheme that enables efficient parameter updates via logarithmic matrix mapping. Validated through mechanical and aerospace case studies, the framework achieves a Log-Euclidean distance of 3.12 × 10−4 in uncertainty updating (compared to a baseline of 48.48) and provides a tenfold computational acceleration over Bayesian alternatives. Robustness tests demonstrate stable performance under 5% noise perturbation, with the Log-Euclidean distance increased only marginally to 1.41 × 10−2. By unifying differential geometry with machine learning, our approach eliminates heuristic projections required in conventional methods while advancing uncertainty quantification through structure-preserving manifold operations. This study bridges geometric consistency, computational efficiency, and physical consistency in uncertainty-aware model updating.