{"title":"Changing interpretations: freedom of association in Germany and the United Kingdom","authors":"FELIX SYROVATKA","doi":"10.1111/jols.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines the transformation in the dominant understanding of freedom of association in Germany and the United Kingdom (UK) within the context of industrial relations liberalization. It argues that both countries have experienced a shift from collectivist to individualist interpretations of freedom of association, driven by a ‘liberal script’ that emphasizes individual autonomy and subjective rights. The study employs a comparative historical analysis to demonstrate how this reinterpretation manifests differently in each country's distinct institutional context. In the UK, the shift occurred through direct legislative reforms, whereas in Germany, it evolved through gradual jurisprudential reinterpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Society","volume":"53 1","pages":"27-50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jols.70037","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jols.70037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article examines the transformation in the dominant understanding of freedom of association in Germany and the United Kingdom (UK) within the context of industrial relations liberalization. It argues that both countries have experienced a shift from collectivist to individualist interpretations of freedom of association, driven by a ‘liberal script’ that emphasizes individual autonomy and subjective rights. The study employs a comparative historical analysis to demonstrate how this reinterpretation manifests differently in each country's distinct institutional context. In the UK, the shift occurred through direct legislative reforms, whereas in Germany, it evolved through gradual jurisprudential reinterpretation.
期刊介绍:
Established as the leading British periodical for Socio-Legal Studies The Journal of Law and Society offers an interdisciplinary approach. It is committed to achieving a broad international appeal, attracting contributions and addressing issues from a range of legal cultures, as well as theoretical concerns of cross- cultural interest. It produces an annual special issue, which is also published in book form. It has a widely respected Book Review section and is cited all over the world. Challenging, authoritative and topical, the journal appeals to legal researchers and practitioners as well as sociologists, criminologists and other social scientists.