Changing interpretations: freedom of association in Germany and the United Kingdom

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Journal of Law and Society Pub Date : 2026-03-30 Epub Date: 2026-02-24 DOI:10.1111/jols.70037
FELIX SYROVATKA
{"title":"Changing interpretations: freedom of association in Germany and the United Kingdom","authors":"FELIX SYROVATKA","doi":"10.1111/jols.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines the transformation in the dominant understanding of freedom of association in Germany and the United Kingdom (UK) within the context of industrial relations liberalization. It argues that both countries have experienced a shift from collectivist to individualist interpretations of freedom of association, driven by a ‘liberal script’ that emphasizes individual autonomy and subjective rights. The study employs a comparative historical analysis to demonstrate how this reinterpretation manifests differently in each country's distinct institutional context. In the UK, the shift occurred through direct legislative reforms, whereas in Germany, it evolved through gradual jurisprudential reinterpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Society","volume":"53 1","pages":"27-50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jols.70037","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jols.70037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the transformation in the dominant understanding of freedom of association in Germany and the United Kingdom (UK) within the context of industrial relations liberalization. It argues that both countries have experienced a shift from collectivist to individualist interpretations of freedom of association, driven by a ‘liberal script’ that emphasizes individual autonomy and subjective rights. The study employs a comparative historical analysis to demonstrate how this reinterpretation manifests differently in each country's distinct institutional context. In the UK, the shift occurred through direct legislative reforms, whereas in Germany, it evolved through gradual jurisprudential reinterpretation.

不断变化的解释:德国和英国的结社自由
本文考察了在劳资关系自由化的背景下,德国和英国对结社自由的主流理解的转变。报告认为,在强调个人自治和主观权利的“自由剧本”的推动下,这两个国家都经历了从集体主义到个人主义对结社自由的解释的转变。本研究采用比较历史分析来证明这种重新解释在每个国家不同的制度背景下是如何表现不同的。在英国,这种转变是通过直接的立法改革发生的,而在德国,它是通过逐步的法理学重新解释而演变的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Established as the leading British periodical for Socio-Legal Studies The Journal of Law and Society offers an interdisciplinary approach. It is committed to achieving a broad international appeal, attracting contributions and addressing issues from a range of legal cultures, as well as theoretical concerns of cross- cultural interest. It produces an annual special issue, which is also published in book form. It has a widely respected Book Review section and is cited all over the world. Challenging, authoritative and topical, the journal appeals to legal researchers and practitioners as well as sociologists, criminologists and other social scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书