Territory, values, and health law in a devolved United Kingdom: examining the role of the gift in opt-out organ donation

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Journal of Law and Society Pub Date : 2026-03-30 Epub Date: 2026-01-13 DOI:10.1111/jols.70031
MATTHEW WATKINS, JOHN HARRINGTON, RUBY REED-BERENDT, ANNE-MAREE FARRELL
{"title":"Territory, values, and health law in a devolved United Kingdom: examining the role of the gift in opt-out organ donation","authors":"MATTHEW WATKINS,&nbsp;JOHN HARRINGTON,&nbsp;RUBY REED-BERENDT,&nbsp;ANNE-MAREE FARRELL","doi":"10.1111/jols.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Devolution since 1998 has seen administrations in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales gain distinct powers over a range of policy fields, with health prominent among them. This poses two pressing questions for socio-legal scholarship that we address in this article: to what extent are changing territorial arrangements significant for the substance of United Kingdom (UK) health law and the values by which it is oriented, and what role is played by devolved health law in redefining territories and values within the UK? Informed by perspectives from human geography and policy studies, and drawing on our own qualitative empirical research, we examine recent lawmaking processes in relation to organ donation reform. ‘Opt-out’ or ‘presumed consent’ schemes, adopted in sequence in each of the UK countries, appear to challenge the centrality of voluntary altruism, extolled as a fundamentally British value in Richard Titmuss’ post-war work on social policy. Our findings confirm that there has been a reterritorialization of values under devolution, with greater emphasis on sub-state identities. However, they also indicate the persistence of a common space of policy learning across the UK and an enduring concern with altruism in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":51544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Society","volume":"53 1","pages":"75-99"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jols.70031","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jols.70031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Devolution since 1998 has seen administrations in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales gain distinct powers over a range of policy fields, with health prominent among them. This poses two pressing questions for socio-legal scholarship that we address in this article: to what extent are changing territorial arrangements significant for the substance of United Kingdom (UK) health law and the values by which it is oriented, and what role is played by devolved health law in redefining territories and values within the UK? Informed by perspectives from human geography and policy studies, and drawing on our own qualitative empirical research, we examine recent lawmaking processes in relation to organ donation reform. ‘Opt-out’ or ‘presumed consent’ schemes, adopted in sequence in each of the UK countries, appear to challenge the centrality of voluntary altruism, extolled as a fundamentally British value in Richard Titmuss’ post-war work on social policy. Our findings confirm that there has been a reterritorialization of values under devolution, with greater emphasis on sub-state identities. However, they also indicate the persistence of a common space of policy learning across the UK and an enduring concern with altruism in this area.

权力下放的联合王国的领土、价值观和卫生法:检查捐赠在选择退出器官捐赠中的作用
自1998年权力下放以来,英格兰、北爱尔兰、苏格兰和威尔士的政府在一系列政策领域获得了独特的权力,其中卫生领域尤为突出。这为我们在本文中解决的社会法律学术提出了两个紧迫的问题:在多大程度上改变领土安排对联合王国(英国)卫生法的实质及其所导向的价值观具有重要意义,以及下放的卫生法在重新定义联合王国境内的领土和价值观方面发挥了什么作用?根据人文地理学和政策研究的观点,并根据我们自己的定性实证研究,我们研究了最近与器官捐赠改革有关的立法进程。“选择退出”或“假定同意”计划,在英国每个国家依次采用,似乎挑战了自愿利他主义的中心地位,在理查德·蒂特马斯战后的社会政策工作中,自愿利他主义被誉为英国的基本价值观。我们的研究结果证实,在权力下放的情况下,价值观出现了重新领土化,更加强调亚州身份。然而,它们也表明,整个英国存在一个共同的政策学习空间,以及对这一领域利他主义的持久关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Established as the leading British periodical for Socio-Legal Studies The Journal of Law and Society offers an interdisciplinary approach. It is committed to achieving a broad international appeal, attracting contributions and addressing issues from a range of legal cultures, as well as theoretical concerns of cross- cultural interest. It produces an annual special issue, which is also published in book form. It has a widely respected Book Review section and is cited all over the world. Challenging, authoritative and topical, the journal appeals to legal researchers and practitioners as well as sociologists, criminologists and other social scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书