The Effectiveness of Prescribed Fire for Native Grassland Restoration and Exotic Weed Control Differs Between Soil Types

IF 1.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Austral Ecology Pub Date : 2026-04-09 DOI:10.1111/aec.70211
Laura C. Rigby, Isabelle Hally, Catherine Leigh, A. Mark Osborn, Akane Uesugi
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Prescribed Fire for Native Grassland Restoration and Exotic Weed Control Differs Between Soil Types","authors":"Laura C. Rigby,&nbsp;Isabelle Hally,&nbsp;Catherine Leigh,&nbsp;A. Mark Osborn,&nbsp;Akane Uesugi","doi":"10.1111/aec.70211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The presence of invasive species often makes the use of prescribed fire for native grassland restoration challenging, as fire could also facilitate exotic plant invasion. The outcome of fire treatment may depend on variation in soil environments. Nutrient-rich soils that are heavily invaded by exotic plants may burn at higher temperatures and damage native plant species recovery. A high nutrient availability may also facilitate post-fire establishment of exotic species that can readily exploit available nutrients. We tested the effect of prescribed fire within a temperate grassland reserve in southeastern Australia that includes two soil types with contrasting nutrient availability—nutrient-poor red soil and nutrient-rich grey soil. A plant survey of the post-fire community showed that fire in red soil reduced the proportion of exotic cover by 39%, but fire in grey soil maintained exotic dominance and reduced native grass and forb abundance by 30% and 71%, respectively. Moreover, fire altered community composition more in red soil than in grey. Partitioning of community dissimilarity further suggested that fire in red soil created a unique native community that differed from unburnt plots, whereas fire in grey soil reduced the abundance of some species without replacing them with individuals of other species. Exotic biomass was correlated with maximum burning temperature, but variation in temperature did not explain the observed differences in native community response to fire between the soil types. Fire increased disparity in soil nutrient content between soil types, potentially making red soil more suitable for some native species. While our study was limited to a single landscape, the results suggest that fire in nutrient-poor soils could be an effective management tool for suppressing exotic plant invasion and increasing native β-diversity across the landscape. But the same practice could be ineffective, or even harmful, in nutrient-rich soils that are already heavily invaded by exotic species.</p>","PeriodicalId":8663,"journal":{"name":"Austral Ecology","volume":"51 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aec.70211","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The presence of invasive species often makes the use of prescribed fire for native grassland restoration challenging, as fire could also facilitate exotic plant invasion. The outcome of fire treatment may depend on variation in soil environments. Nutrient-rich soils that are heavily invaded by exotic plants may burn at higher temperatures and damage native plant species recovery. A high nutrient availability may also facilitate post-fire establishment of exotic species that can readily exploit available nutrients. We tested the effect of prescribed fire within a temperate grassland reserve in southeastern Australia that includes two soil types with contrasting nutrient availability—nutrient-poor red soil and nutrient-rich grey soil. A plant survey of the post-fire community showed that fire in red soil reduced the proportion of exotic cover by 39%, but fire in grey soil maintained exotic dominance and reduced native grass and forb abundance by 30% and 71%, respectively. Moreover, fire altered community composition more in red soil than in grey. Partitioning of community dissimilarity further suggested that fire in red soil created a unique native community that differed from unburnt plots, whereas fire in grey soil reduced the abundance of some species without replacing them with individuals of other species. Exotic biomass was correlated with maximum burning temperature, but variation in temperature did not explain the observed differences in native community response to fire between the soil types. Fire increased disparity in soil nutrient content between soil types, potentially making red soil more suitable for some native species. While our study was limited to a single landscape, the results suggest that fire in nutrient-poor soils could be an effective management tool for suppressing exotic plant invasion and increasing native β-diversity across the landscape. But the same practice could be ineffective, or even harmful, in nutrient-rich soils that are already heavily invaded by exotic species.

Abstract Image

不同土壤类型对原生草地恢复和外来杂草控制效果的影响
入侵物种的存在往往使得使用规定的火来恢复原生草地具有挑战性,因为火也可能促进外来植物的入侵。火处理的结果可能取决于土壤环境的变化。被外来植物大量入侵的营养丰富的土壤可能在更高的温度下燃烧,损害本地植物物种的恢复。高养分利用率也可能促进外来物种在火灾后的建立,这些外来物种可以很容易地利用现有的养分。我们在澳大利亚东南部的一个温带草原保护区测试了规定火的效果,该保护区包括两种土壤类型,它们的养分有效性形成对比——营养贫乏的红壤和营养丰富的灰壤。火灾后群落的植物调查表明,红壤火灾使外来植被的覆盖比例降低了39%,而灰壤火灾保持了外来植被的优势地位,使原生牧草和牧草的丰度分别降低了30%和71%。火灾对红壤群落组成的影响大于对灰壤群落的影响。群落差异的划分进一步表明,红壤火灾产生了不同于未燃烧地块的独特的本地群落,而灰色土壤火灾减少了某些物种的丰度,而没有用其他物种的个体取代它们。外来生物量与最高燃烧温度相关,但温度的变化不能解释不同土壤类型的本地群落对火灾的响应差异。火灾增加了不同土壤类型之间土壤养分含量的差异,可能使红壤更适合某些本地物种。虽然我们的研究仅限于单一景观,但结果表明,在营养贫乏的土壤中,火灾可能是抑制外来植物入侵和增加景观中本地β多样性的有效管理工具。但是,在已经被外来物种严重入侵的营养丰富的土壤中,同样的做法可能无效,甚至有害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Austral Ecology
Austral Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Austral Ecology is the premier journal for basic and applied ecology in the Southern Hemisphere. As the official Journal of The Ecological Society of Australia (ESA), Austral Ecology addresses the commonality between ecosystems in Australia and many parts of southern Africa, South America, New Zealand and Oceania. For example many species in the unique biotas of these regions share common Gondwana ancestors. ESA''s aim is to publish innovative research to encourage the sharing of information and experiences that enrich the understanding of the ecology of the Southern Hemisphere. Austral Ecology involves an editorial board with representatives from Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Brazil and Argentina. These representatives provide expert opinions, access to qualified reviewers and act as a focus for attracting a wide range of contributions from countries across the region. Austral Ecology publishes original papers describing experimental, observational or theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine or freshwater systems, which are considered without taxonomic bias. Special thematic issues are published regularly, including symposia on the ecology of estuaries and soft sediment habitats, freshwater systems and coral reef fish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书