From Recognition to Resonance: Insights for Lutheran Theology From Hartmut Rosa's Critique of Honneth

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Dialog-A Journal of Theology Pub Date : 2026-03-30 Epub Date: 2026-03-04 DOI:10.1111/dial.70022
Mikkel Gabriel Christoffersen
{"title":"From Recognition to Resonance: Insights for Lutheran Theology From Hartmut Rosa's Critique of Honneth","authors":"Mikkel Gabriel Christoffersen","doi":"10.1111/dial.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article engages Hartmut Rosa's critique of Axel Honneth's theory of recognition to reconsider Lutheran interpretations of the doctrine of justification. While recognition theory has offered fruitful resources for articulating justification as divine recognition, it also risks reducing faith to a form of moral validation. Drawing on Rosa's concept of resonance, the article argues that justification can also be understood as an uncontrollable, transformative event in which God addresses human beings and evokes faith as response. Through a systematic comparison of recognition and resonance, the article explores possible implications for faith, the good life, world relations, divine–human mutuality, and social struggle. It proposes that resonance expands Lutheran theology by addressing contemporary experiences of alienation and spiritual muteness, reframing justification as participation in a living, responsive relation to God with consequences for relations to the world.</p>","PeriodicalId":42769,"journal":{"name":"Dialog-A Journal of Theology","volume":"65 1","pages":"16-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dial.70022","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialog-A Journal of Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dial.70022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article engages Hartmut Rosa's critique of Axel Honneth's theory of recognition to reconsider Lutheran interpretations of the doctrine of justification. While recognition theory has offered fruitful resources for articulating justification as divine recognition, it also risks reducing faith to a form of moral validation. Drawing on Rosa's concept of resonance, the article argues that justification can also be understood as an uncontrollable, transformative event in which God addresses human beings and evokes faith as response. Through a systematic comparison of recognition and resonance, the article explores possible implications for faith, the good life, world relations, divine–human mutuality, and social struggle. It proposes that resonance expands Lutheran theology by addressing contemporary experiences of alienation and spiritual muteness, reframing justification as participation in a living, responsive relation to God with consequences for relations to the world.

Abstract Image

从认同到共鸣:从哈特穆特·罗莎对霍尼思的批判看路德神学
本文结合哈特穆特·罗莎对阿克塞尔·霍尼特的承认理论的批判,重新思考路德教会对称义教义的解释。虽然承认理论提供了丰富的资源,将称义表述为神的承认,但它也有将信仰降低为一种道德确认形式的风险。根据罗莎的共鸣概念,文章认为称义也可以被理解为一种不可控的、变革性的事件,在这种事件中,上帝向人类发表讲话,并唤起信仰作为回应。本文通过对认同与共鸣的系统比较,探讨了对信仰、美好生活、世界关系、神人共生以及社会斗争的可能含义。它提出共振扩展了路德神学,通过解决当代异化和精神沉默的经验,重新定义为参与一个活生生的,与上帝的响应关系,对与世界的关系的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书