{"title":"Ethical dilemmas in ethnographic research on end-of-life care","authors":"Natashe Lemos Dekker, Hanum Atikasari, Syeda Shajeela Shawkat, Annemarie Samuels","doi":"10.1111/1467-8322.70060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ethnographic research on end-of-life care raises ethical dilemmas that merit explicit discussion. Drawing on fieldwork conducted in Brazil, India and Indonesia as part of a comparative research project, this article examines a recurring ethical problem: the sensitivity of sharing or withholding diagnostic and prognostic knowledge when death is near. Such dilemmas overlap with those faced more broadly in medical anthropology, but the stakes are heightened when research participants have little time left and the researcher's decisions may affect how that time is spent. The article reflects on three fieldwork encounters in which researchers faced these tensions in different circumstances, and argues for the value of collective, team-based ethical deliberation before, during and after fieldwork. Open discussion of ethical dilemmas can help ethnographers of death and dying reflect on, decide on and sometimes simply sit with the challenges they encounter.</p>","PeriodicalId":46293,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology Today","volume":"42 2","pages":"23-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://rai.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8322.70060","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://rai.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8322.70060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ethnographic research on end-of-life care raises ethical dilemmas that merit explicit discussion. Drawing on fieldwork conducted in Brazil, India and Indonesia as part of a comparative research project, this article examines a recurring ethical problem: the sensitivity of sharing or withholding diagnostic and prognostic knowledge when death is near. Such dilemmas overlap with those faced more broadly in medical anthropology, but the stakes are heightened when research participants have little time left and the researcher's decisions may affect how that time is spent. The article reflects on three fieldwork encounters in which researchers faced these tensions in different circumstances, and argues for the value of collective, team-based ethical deliberation before, during and after fieldwork. Open discussion of ethical dilemmas can help ethnographers of death and dying reflect on, decide on and sometimes simply sit with the challenges they encounter.
期刊介绍：
Anthropology Today is a bimonthly publication which aims to provide a forum for the application of anthropological analysis to public and topical issues, while reflecting the breadth of interests within the discipline of anthropology. It is also committed to promoting debate at the interface between anthropology and areas of applied knowledge such as education, medicine, development etc. as well as that between anthropology and other academic disciplines. Anthropology Today encourages submissions on a wide range of topics, consistent with these aims. Anthropology Today is an international journal both in the scope of issues it covers and in the sources it draws from.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
