Supply Chain Network Design Focused on Financial Measures and Performance Metrics: A Systematic Literature Review

IF 2.6 Q2 ECONOMICS
Sina Abbasi, Çiğdem Sıcakyüz
{"title":"Supply Chain Network Design Focused on Financial Measures and Performance Metrics: A Systematic Literature Review","authors":"Sina Abbasi,&nbsp;Çiğdem Sıcakyüz","doi":"10.1007/s10690-025-09533-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Through an extensive literature review, this study determines which metrics and measures are relevant for supply chain (SC) performance. We reviewed several universal papers published between 2012 and 2023. A selection of review papers was made according to the methods, contribution, and scope for measuring SC performance metrics and measures. By reviewing the literature, this survey prepares benchmarks and approaches for determining SC performance from a financial viewpoint. As core financial measures of SC performance, we investigation looked at inventory turnover ratios, logistics costs, and cash flows expressed as return on investment (ROI), return on equity (ROE), return on asset (ROA), profit margins, assets/liabilities, and working capital. Additionally, the study determined that key non-financial measures of SC performance are customer satisfaction, delivery performance, quality services, improved relationships, and competitive advantages. According to the study, the appropriate approaches for assessing SC performance are financial and non-financial measures. Using the same approach, measures, and metrics at all SC nodes is essential to determine SC performance appropriately. Moreover, research is needed to identify the benefits and issues preventing SC measurements and performance across different industries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54095,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Financial Markets","volume":"33 2","pages":"505 - 535"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Financial Markets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10690-025-09533-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Through an extensive literature review, this study determines which metrics and measures are relevant for supply chain (SC) performance. We reviewed several universal papers published between 2012 and 2023. A selection of review papers was made according to the methods, contribution, and scope for measuring SC performance metrics and measures. By reviewing the literature, this survey prepares benchmarks and approaches for determining SC performance from a financial viewpoint. As core financial measures of SC performance, we investigation looked at inventory turnover ratios, logistics costs, and cash flows expressed as return on investment (ROI), return on equity (ROE), return on asset (ROA), profit margins, assets/liabilities, and working capital. Additionally, the study determined that key non-financial measures of SC performance are customer satisfaction, delivery performance, quality services, improved relationships, and competitive advantages. According to the study, the appropriate approaches for assessing SC performance are financial and non-financial measures. Using the same approach, measures, and metrics at all SC nodes is essential to determine SC performance appropriately. Moreover, research is needed to identify the benefits and issues preventing SC measurements and performance across different industries.

供应链网络设计关注财务措施和绩效指标:系统的文献综述
通过广泛的文献回顾,本研究确定了哪些指标和措施与供应链(SC)绩效相关。我们回顾了2012年至2023年间发表的几篇通用论文。根据测量供应链绩效指标和措施的方法、贡献和范围,选择了综述论文。通过回顾文献,本调查准备了从财务角度确定供应链绩效的基准和方法。作为供应链绩效的核心财务指标,我们的调查研究了库存周转率、物流成本和以投资回报率(ROI)、股本回报率(ROE)、资产回报率(ROA)、利润率、资产/负债和营运资本表示的现金流。此外,该研究确定了供应链绩效的关键非财务指标是客户满意度、交付绩效、优质服务、改善的关系和竞争优势。根据该研究,评估供应链绩效的适当方法是财务和非财务措施。在所有SC节点上使用相同的方法、度量和指标对于适当地确定SC性能至关重要。此外,还需要进行研究,以确定在不同行业中妨碍SC测量和性能的好处和问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The current remarkable growth in the Asia-Pacific financial markets is certain to continue. These markets are expected to play a further important role in the world capital markets for investment and risk management. In accordance with this development, Asia-Pacific Financial Markets (formerly Financial Engineering and the Japanese Markets), the official journal of the Japanese Association of Financial Econometrics and Engineering (JAFEE), is expected to provide an international forum for researchers and practitioners in academia, industry, and government, who engage in empirical and/or theoretical research into the financial markets. We invite submission of quality papers on all aspects of finance and financial engineering. Here we interpret the term ''financial engineering'' broadly enough to cover such topics as financial time series, portfolio analysis, global asset allocation, trading strategy for investment, optimization methods, macro monetary economic analysis and pricing models for various financial assets including derivatives We stress that purely theoretical papers, as well as empirical studies that use Asia-Pacific market data, are welcome. Officially cited as: Asia-Pac Financ Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书