Feasibility of Using an AI System for Breast Ultrasonography Interpretation According to Clinical Expertise: Results of a Pilot Study.

IF 0.6
Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-17 DOI:10.3348/jksr.2024.0144
Jeeyoun Kim, Kyungwha Han, Keum Won Kim, Won Hwa Kim, Jaeil Kim, Jung Hyun Yoon
{"title":"Feasibility of Using an AI System for Breast Ultrasonography Interpretation According to Clinical Expertise: Results of a Pilot Study.","authors":"Jeeyoun Kim, Kyungwha Han, Keum Won Kim, Won Hwa Kim, Jaeil Kim, Jung Hyun Yoon","doi":"10.3348/jksr.2024.0144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the benefits of using a commercially available AI system for breast ultrasonography (US) among readers with varying levels of expertise.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 285 breast lesions from 141 women who underwent breast US between February 2012 and April 2015 were retrospectively analyzed using a deep-learning-based AI system for lesion detection and diagnosis. Five readers, comprising experienced (two breast radiologists and one breast surgeon) and inexperienced (one gynecologist and one radiology resident) groups, reviewed the grayscale US images in two sessions: without AI assistance (session 1) and with AI assistance after a two-week washout period (session 2). Diagnostic performance was compared between sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean area under the curve for all readers significantly improved with AI, increasing from 0.885 to 0.927 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The inexperienced group demonstrated significant improvements in mean sensitivity (56.9%-87.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), negative predictive value (NPV) (77.9%-90.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and accuracy (76.1%-84.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.005). However, no significant improvements were observed for the experienced readers (all <i>p</i>-values > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AI system for breast US significantly enhanced the diagnostic performance of inexperienced readers, augmenting sensitivity, NPV, and accuracy, while experienced readers demonstrated minimal improvement, likely due to their already high baseline performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":101329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology","volume":"87 2","pages":"314-327"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13062396/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2024.0144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the benefits of using a commercially available AI system for breast ultrasonography (US) among readers with varying levels of expertise.

Materials and methods: A total of 285 breast lesions from 141 women who underwent breast US between February 2012 and April 2015 were retrospectively analyzed using a deep-learning-based AI system for lesion detection and diagnosis. Five readers, comprising experienced (two breast radiologists and one breast surgeon) and inexperienced (one gynecologist and one radiology resident) groups, reviewed the grayscale US images in two sessions: without AI assistance (session 1) and with AI assistance after a two-week washout period (session 2). Diagnostic performance was compared between sessions.

Results: The mean area under the curve for all readers significantly improved with AI, increasing from 0.885 to 0.927 (p < 0.001). The inexperienced group demonstrated significant improvements in mean sensitivity (56.9%-87.5%, p < 0.001), negative predictive value (NPV) (77.9%-90.1%, p < 0.001), and accuracy (76.1%-84.4%, p = 0.005). However, no significant improvements were observed for the experienced readers (all p-values > 0.05).

Conclusion: The AI system for breast US significantly enhanced the diagnostic performance of inexperienced readers, augmenting sensitivity, NPV, and accuracy, while experienced readers demonstrated minimal improvement, likely due to their already high baseline performance.

应用人工智能系统根据临床经验进行乳腺超声判读的可行性:一项试点研究的结果。
目的:评估在不同专业水平的读者中使用市售人工智能系统进行乳房超声检查(US)的好处。材料与方法:采用基于深度学习的人工智能系统对2012年2月至2015年4月期间接受乳腺超声检查的141名女性的285个乳腺病变进行回顾性分析。五名读者,包括有经验的(两名乳房放射科医生和一名乳房外科医生)和没有经验的(一名妇科医生和一名放射住院医师)小组,分两组回顾了灰度美国图像:在没有人工智能帮助的情况下(第1组)和在两周的洗脱期后有人工智能帮助的情况下(第2组)。在会话之间比较诊断性能。结果:人工智能显著改善了所有读者的平均曲线下面积,从0.885增加到0.927 (p < 0.001)。经验组在平均敏感性(56.9% ~ 87.5%,p < 0.001)、阴性预测值(NPV) (77.9% ~ 90.1%, p < 0.001)和准确性(76.1% ~ 84.4%,p = 0.005)方面均有显著改善。然而,对于经验丰富的读者,没有观察到显著的改善(p值均为0.05)。结论:乳腺US的AI系统显著提高了经验不足的读者的诊断性能,增加了灵敏度、NPV和准确性,而经验丰富的读者的改善很小,可能是由于他们已经很高的基线性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书