Ability to mentalize and the sense of meaning in life in the professional group of nurses: a cross-sectional study.

IF 0.9
Medycyna pracy Pub Date : 2026-04-28 Epub Date: 2026-04-08 DOI:10.13075/mp.5893.01674
Łukasz Krzewiński, Patrycja Basińska
{"title":"Ability to mentalize and the sense of meaning in life in the professional group of nurses: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Łukasz Krzewiński, Patrycja Basińska","doi":"10.13075/mp.5893.01674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mentalization supports emotion regulation and interpersonal functioning, and meaning in life is a key psychological resource in nursing. This study examined associations between mentalizing capacity and meaning in life among practicing nurses.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In a cross-sectional survey (February-March 2025) of 93 nurses (66 women, 27 men) working in hospital wards and public outpatient clinics in the Kujawsko-Pomorskie Voivodeship (Poland), mentalization was assessed with the <i>Mentalization Scale</i> (MentS), including the subscales: <i>Mentalization of Self</i>, <i>Mentalization of Others</i>, and <i>Motivation to Mentalize</i>. Meaning in life was measured with the <i>Meaning in Life Questionnaire</i> (MLQ) - the <i>Presence</i> and <i>Search</i> subscales of the MLQ - and the <i>Purpose in Life Test</i> (PIL). The PIL dimension attitude towards death and suicide was excluded due to unacceptable internal consistency ( α = 0.07). Analyses used Pearson correlations with false discovery rate control (Benjamini-Hochberg, q = 0.05) and multiple regression models entering the 3 MentS dimensions simultaneously while controlling for age and gender (N = 91, listwise deletion).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Self-oriented mentalizing correlated with MLQ <i>Presence</i> (r = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.18-0.53) and strongly with PIL purpose in life (r = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.61-0.81). Associations were generally stronger for PIL dimensions than for MLQ<i> Search</i>. In regression, self-oriented mentalizing uniquely predicted MLQ<i> Presence</i> (ß = 0.40, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.182) and PIL total (ß = 0.54, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.464). The regression model for MLQ <i>Search</i> was not significant (R<sup>2</sup>= 0.092).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher mentalizing - particularly self-oriented mentalizing - was associated with a stronger sense of meaning in life in nurses, primarily reflecting meaning presence rather than meaning search. Given the cross-sectional design and convenience sample, findings are associative and warrant replication in larger studies. Med Pr Work Health Saf. 2026;77(2):101-109.</p>","PeriodicalId":101460,"journal":{"name":"Medycyna pracy","volume":" ","pages":"101-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medycyna pracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13075/mp.5893.01674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mentalization supports emotion regulation and interpersonal functioning, and meaning in life is a key psychological resource in nursing. This study examined associations between mentalizing capacity and meaning in life among practicing nurses.

Material and methods: In a cross-sectional survey (February-March 2025) of 93 nurses (66 women, 27 men) working in hospital wards and public outpatient clinics in the Kujawsko-Pomorskie Voivodeship (Poland), mentalization was assessed with the Mentalization Scale (MentS), including the subscales: Mentalization of Self, Mentalization of Others, and Motivation to Mentalize. Meaning in life was measured with the Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MLQ) - the Presence and Search subscales of the MLQ - and the Purpose in Life Test (PIL). The PIL dimension attitude towards death and suicide was excluded due to unacceptable internal consistency ( α = 0.07). Analyses used Pearson correlations with false discovery rate control (Benjamini-Hochberg, q = 0.05) and multiple regression models entering the 3 MentS dimensions simultaneously while controlling for age and gender (N = 91, listwise deletion).

Results: Self-oriented mentalizing correlated with MLQ Presence (r = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.18-0.53) and strongly with PIL purpose in life (r = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.61-0.81). Associations were generally stronger for PIL dimensions than for MLQ Search. In regression, self-oriented mentalizing uniquely predicted MLQ Presence (ß = 0.40, R2 = 0.182) and PIL total (ß = 0.54, R2 = 0.464). The regression model for MLQ Search was not significant (R2= 0.092).

Conclusions: Higher mentalizing - particularly self-oriented mentalizing - was associated with a stronger sense of meaning in life in nurses, primarily reflecting meaning presence rather than meaning search. Given the cross-sectional design and convenience sample, findings are associative and warrant replication in larger studies. Med Pr Work Health Saf. 2026;77(2):101-109.

专业护理人员心理化能力与生活意义感的横断面研究。
背景:心理化支持情绪调节和人际功能,生活意义是护理中重要的心理资源。本研究考察执业护士心理化能力与生活意义之间的关系。材料和方法:在一项横断面调查(2025年2月至3月)中,在kujawsko - pomorske省(波兰)的医院病房和公共门诊诊所工作的93名护士(66名女性,27名男性),使用心理化量表(MentS)评估心理化,包括子量表:自我心理化、他人心理化和心理化动机。用生活意义问卷(MLQ) - MLQ的存在和搜索子量表-和生活目的测试(PIL)来测量生活意义。PIL维度对死亡和自杀的态度因内部一致性不合格而被排除(α = 0.07)。分析使用Pearson相关性与错误发现率控制(Benjamini-Hochberg, q = 0.05)和多重回归模型同时进入3个维度,同时控制年龄和性别(N = 91,按列表删除)。结果:自我导向心理化与MLQ存在相关(r = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.18-0.53),与PIL生活目的相关(r = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.61-0.81)。与MLQ搜索相比,PIL维度的关联通常更强。在回归分析中,自我导向心理化对MLQ存在(ß = 0.40, R2 = 0.182)和PIL总量(ß = 0.54, R2 = 0.464)的预测具有唯一性。MLQ Search的回归模型不显著(R2= 0.092)。结论:较高的心理化——尤其是自我导向心理化——与护士更强的生活意义感相关,主要反映的是意义存在而不是意义寻找。考虑到横断面设计和方便的样本,研究结果是相关的,并保证在更大规模的研究中复制。中华医学杂志,2009;27(2)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书