The Patient, the Provider, and the TikTok Creator: Qualitative Analysis of the Content and Quality of Videos on Prenatal Genetic Screening

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Journal of midwifery & women's health Pub Date : 2026-08-11 Epub Date: 2026-04-13 DOI:10.1111/jmwh.70121
Erin P. Johnson PhD, Naomi O. Riches PhD, Stephanie Arceneaux BA, Emma Murdock MA, Caitlin Quade MPH, Susanna R. Cohen CNM, DNP, Robin E. Jensen PhD
{"title":"The Patient, the Provider, and the TikTok Creator: Qualitative Analysis of the Content and Quality of Videos on Prenatal Genetic Screening","authors":"Erin P. Johnson PhD,&nbsp;Naomi O. Riches PhD,&nbsp;Stephanie Arceneaux BA,&nbsp;Emma Murdock MA,&nbsp;Caitlin Quade MPH,&nbsp;Susanna R. Cohen CNM, DNP,&nbsp;Robin E. Jensen PhD","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.70121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Although providers may view the use of the noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) screen as an opportunity for patients to learn more about potential chromosomal variants of a fetus, research suggests that patients may view the genetic screening test primarily as an opportunity to learn about their fetus's sex chromosomes and may not understand the implications of a screening test, as compared with a diagnostic test. This study critically evaluates the informational quality of TikTok content related to NIPT, with a specific focus on the use and conflation of sex and gender terminology.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 83 TikTok videos met our inclusion criteria. Two team members systematically coded the videos using a modified DISCERN instrument and content-specific codes to assess reliability and informational quality across 3 content creator categories: patients/nonexperts, health care professionals, and organizations. Many codes focused specifically on the use of gendered language in the videos.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Patient-generated content exhibited the highest engagement metrics but frequently misrepresented NIPT as a confirmatory test and conflated sex with gender. Health care provider and organizational videos demonstrated higher informational reliability but were not immune to deterministic language around sex and gender and promotional framing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings underscore the influence of social media as a health information source and reveal significant gaps in public understanding of NIPT, particularly regarding its screening nature and limitations. Additionally, these results highlight the need for clinical protocols that address patient misconceptions and suggest that health care professionals should actively engage with digital platforms to familiarize themselves with what patients are seeing and hearing online. Recommendations include avoiding gendered mirroring, asking questions about patient knowledge, and leveraging social media for public health education.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":"71 4","pages":"618-627"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmwh.70121","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmwh.70121","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Although providers may view the use of the noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) screen as an opportunity for patients to learn more about potential chromosomal variants of a fetus, research suggests that patients may view the genetic screening test primarily as an opportunity to learn about their fetus's sex chromosomes and may not understand the implications of a screening test, as compared with a diagnostic test. This study critically evaluates the informational quality of TikTok content related to NIPT, with a specific focus on the use and conflation of sex and gender terminology.

Methods

A total of 83 TikTok videos met our inclusion criteria. Two team members systematically coded the videos using a modified DISCERN instrument and content-specific codes to assess reliability and informational quality across 3 content creator categories: patients/nonexperts, health care professionals, and organizations. Many codes focused specifically on the use of gendered language in the videos.

Results

Patient-generated content exhibited the highest engagement metrics but frequently misrepresented NIPT as a confirmatory test and conflated sex with gender. Health care provider and organizational videos demonstrated higher informational reliability but were not immune to deterministic language around sex and gender and promotional framing.

Discussion

The findings underscore the influence of social media as a health information source and reveal significant gaps in public understanding of NIPT, particularly regarding its screening nature and limitations. Additionally, these results highlight the need for clinical protocols that address patient misconceptions and suggest that health care professionals should actively engage with digital platforms to familiarize themselves with what patients are seeing and hearing online. Recommendations include avoiding gendered mirroring, asking questions about patient knowledge, and leveraging social media for public health education.

患者、提供者和抖音创作者:产前基因筛查视频内容和质量的定性分析。
简介:虽然提供者可能认为使用无创产前检测(NIPT)筛选为患者提供了更多了解胎儿潜在染色体变异的机会,但研究表明,患者可能主要将基因筛查测试视为了解胎儿性染色体的机会,与诊断测试相比,他们可能不理解筛查测试的含义。本研究批判性地评估了与NIPT相关的TikTok内容的信息质量,特别关注性别和性别术语的使用和合并。方法:共有83个TikTok视频符合我们的纳入标准。两名团队成员使用改进的DISCERN工具和内容特定代码对视频进行系统编码,以评估3个内容创建者类别(患者/非专家、卫生保健专业人员和组织)的可靠性和信息质量。许多法规特别关注视频中性别语言的使用。结果:患者生成的内容显示出最高的参与指标,但经常将NIPT歪曲为确认性测试,并将性别与性别混为一谈。卫生保健提供者和组织的视频显示出更高的信息可靠性,但并非不受有关性别和性别以及宣传框架的确定性语言的影响。讨论:研究结果强调了社交媒体作为健康信息来源的影响,并揭示了公众对NIPT的理解存在重大差距,特别是关于其筛查性质和局限性。此外,这些结果强调了解决患者误解的临床协议的必要性,并建议卫生保健专业人员应积极参与数字平台,以熟悉患者在线看到和听到的内容。建议包括避免性别镜像,询问有关患者知识的问题,以及利用社交媒体进行公共卫生教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Midwifery & Women''s Health (JMWH) is a bimonthly, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research and review articles that focus on midwifery and women''s health. JMWH provides a forum for interdisciplinary exchange across a broad range of women''s health issues. Manuscripts that address midwifery, women''s health, education, evidence-based practice, public health, policy, and research are welcomed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书