Thread Depth Effects on Stability and Positional Accuracy in Guided Immediate Implants: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 4
Na-Yoon Kwon, Ji-Young Jung, Kyung-A Ko, Seung-Hyun Park, Franz Josef Strauss, Jung-Seok Lee
{"title":"Thread Depth Effects on Stability and Positional Accuracy in Guided Immediate Implants: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Na-Yoon Kwon, Ji-Young Jung, Kyung-A Ko, Seung-Hyun Park, Franz Josef Strauss, Jung-Seok Lee","doi":"10.1111/cid.70145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the influence of implant thread depth on implant stability and positional accuracy in fully guided immediate implant placement.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty-four patients received a reference tapered (BLT), a standard-thread (MST), or a deep-thread implant (MDT). Fifty-four implants were placed using fully guided surgery and evaluated over 1-year follow-up. Primary outcomes were implant stability (insertion torque, ISQ, ISV). Secondary outcomes included positional accuracy and marginal bone level (MBL) at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary and longitudinal stability were comparable across groups. Insertion torque was highest for MDT implants, followed by MST and BLT implants (BLT: 35.28 ± 11.18; MST: 40.00 ± 11.88; MDT: 43.89 ± 10.92 Ncm; p = 0.062). A higher proportion of MDT implants achieved insertion torque ≥ 40 Ncm (MDT: 14/18; MST: 12/18; BLT: 8/18). Angular deviation differed among implant groups (MDT: 5.57° ± 3.71°; BLT: 4.73° ± 2.46°; MST: 3.58° ± 1.81°; p = 0.062). In subgroup analysis comparing implants differing only in thread depth (MST vs. MDT), angular deviation was significantly greater for MDT (p = 0.029), particularly in molar sites. At 12 months, MBL did not differ significantly among groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In fully guided immediate implant placement, deeper-thread implants showed higher insertion torque values but were associated with greater angular deviation, while longitudinal stability and marginal bone levels remained comparable. Deeper-thread designs may be beneficial when enhanced primary stability is required, provided careful angulation control is ensured.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>cris.nih.go.kr Identifier: KCT0009402; This clinical trial was not registered prior to participant recruitment and randomization.</p>","PeriodicalId":93944,"journal":{"name":"Clinical implant dentistry and related research","volume":"28 2","pages":"e70145"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13077180/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical implant dentistry and related research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.70145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the influence of implant thread depth on implant stability and positional accuracy in fully guided immediate implant placement.

Materials and methods: Fifty-four patients received a reference tapered (BLT), a standard-thread (MST), or a deep-thread implant (MDT). Fifty-four implants were placed using fully guided surgery and evaluated over 1-year follow-up. Primary outcomes were implant stability (insertion torque, ISQ, ISV). Secondary outcomes included positional accuracy and marginal bone level (MBL) at 12 months.

Results: Primary and longitudinal stability were comparable across groups. Insertion torque was highest for MDT implants, followed by MST and BLT implants (BLT: 35.28 ± 11.18; MST: 40.00 ± 11.88; MDT: 43.89 ± 10.92 Ncm; p = 0.062). A higher proportion of MDT implants achieved insertion torque ≥ 40 Ncm (MDT: 14/18; MST: 12/18; BLT: 8/18). Angular deviation differed among implant groups (MDT: 5.57° ± 3.71°; BLT: 4.73° ± 2.46°; MST: 3.58° ± 1.81°; p = 0.062). In subgroup analysis comparing implants differing only in thread depth (MST vs. MDT), angular deviation was significantly greater for MDT (p = 0.029), particularly in molar sites. At 12 months, MBL did not differ significantly among groups.

Conclusions: In fully guided immediate implant placement, deeper-thread implants showed higher insertion torque values but were associated with greater angular deviation, while longitudinal stability and marginal bone levels remained comparable. Deeper-thread designs may be beneficial when enhanced primary stability is required, provided careful angulation control is ensured.

Trial registration: cris.nih.go.kr Identifier: KCT0009402; This clinical trial was not registered prior to participant recruitment and randomization.

螺纹深度对直接种植体稳定性和定位精度的影响:一项随机对照试验。
目的:探讨全引导即刻种植体植入中种植体螺纹深度对种植体稳定性和定位精度的影响。材料和方法:54例患者接受参考锥形种植体(BLT)、标准螺纹种植体(MST)或深螺纹种植体(MDT)。54例植入物采用完全引导手术,随访1年。主要结果是种植体稳定性(插入扭矩、ISQ、ISV)。次要结果包括12个月时的位置准确性和边缘骨水平(MBL)。结果:各组间的初级和纵向稳定性具有可比性。植入扭矩以MDT最高,其次为MST和BLT (BLT: 35.28±11.18 Ncm; MST: 40.00±11.88;MDT: 43.89±10.92 Ncm; p = 0.062)。MDT植入物插入扭矩≥40 Ncm的比例较高(MDT: 14/18; MST: 12/18; BLT: 8/18)。不同种植体的角度偏差差异较大(MDT: 5.57°±3.71°;BLT: 4.73°±2.46°;MST: 3.58°±1.81°;p = 0.062)。在亚组分析中,比较仅在螺纹深度(MST与MDT)不同的种植体,MDT的角偏差明显更大(p = 0.029),特别是在磨牙部位。12个月时,两组间MBL无显著差异。结论:在完全引导的即刻种植体植入中,较深的螺纹种植体显示更高的插入扭矩值,但与较大的角度偏差相关,而纵向稳定性和边缘骨水平保持相当。当需要增强初级稳定性时,如果能确保仔细的成角控制,深螺纹设计可能是有益的。试验注册:cris.ni.go .kr标识符:KCT0009402;在参与者招募和随机化之前,该临床试验未注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书