[Clinical Evaluation of AI-based Automatic Contouring for Thoracic Structures].

Hideharu Miura, Minoru Nakao, Masanori Ochi, Masahiro Kenjo, Shuichi Ozawa, Masayuki Kagemoto
{"title":"[Clinical Evaluation of AI-based Automatic Contouring for Thoracic Structures].","authors":"Hideharu Miura, Minoru Nakao, Masanori Ochi, Masahiro Kenjo, Shuichi Ozawa, Masayuki Kagemoto","doi":"10.6009/jjrt.26-1649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to verify the contouring accuracy of the artificial intelligence (AI)-based auto-segmentation software Contour+ (MVision AI Oy, Helsinki, Finland) both quantitatively and visually, and to evaluate its clinical validity for the thoracic region in Japanese patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten thoracic radiotherapy cases with lung lesions were analyzed. Contour+ was used to automatically delineate both lungs, trachea, bronchus, esophagus, spinal cord, and heart. Three observers visually evaluated the auto-contours using a five-point scoring system, and the final manually corrected contours were used as the reference to calculate the dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), and volume differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all cases, the AI auto-contours were evaluated as \"clinically acceptable with minor modifications (score ≥3),\" with an average score of 4.4. The mean DSC values were 1.00 for the lungs, 0.99 for the trachea, 0.91 for the bronchi, 0.86 for the esophagus, 0.99 for the spinal cord, and 0.99 for the heart, indicating high agreement. The mean HD values were 5.68 mm, 8.72 mm, and 3.30 mm for the bronchi, esophagus, and heart, respectively. The mean volume changes after manual correction were 4.02 cc for the bronchi, 2.55 cc for the esophagus, and 2.58 cc for the heart.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI-based auto-segmentation software Contour+ demonstrated high geometric agreement and clinical validity for major thoracic organs in Japanese patients, suggesting its potential to reduce the contouring workload and promote standardization in radiotherapy treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":74309,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","volume":"82 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.26-1649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to verify the contouring accuracy of the artificial intelligence (AI)-based auto-segmentation software Contour+ (MVision AI Oy, Helsinki, Finland) both quantitatively and visually, and to evaluate its clinical validity for the thoracic region in Japanese patients.

Methods: Ten thoracic radiotherapy cases with lung lesions were analyzed. Contour+ was used to automatically delineate both lungs, trachea, bronchus, esophagus, spinal cord, and heart. Three observers visually evaluated the auto-contours using a five-point scoring system, and the final manually corrected contours were used as the reference to calculate the dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), and volume differences.

Results: In all cases, the AI auto-contours were evaluated as "clinically acceptable with minor modifications (score ≥3)," with an average score of 4.4. The mean DSC values were 1.00 for the lungs, 0.99 for the trachea, 0.91 for the bronchi, 0.86 for the esophagus, 0.99 for the spinal cord, and 0.99 for the heart, indicating high agreement. The mean HD values were 5.68 mm, 8.72 mm, and 3.30 mm for the bronchi, esophagus, and heart, respectively. The mean volume changes after manual correction were 4.02 cc for the bronchi, 2.55 cc for the esophagus, and 2.58 cc for the heart.

Conclusion: AI-based auto-segmentation software Contour+ demonstrated high geometric agreement and clinical validity for major thoracic organs in Japanese patients, suggesting its potential to reduce the contouring workload and promote standardization in radiotherapy treatment planning.

基于人工智能的胸部结构自动轮廓的临床评价
目的:本研究旨在从定量和视觉上验证基于人工智能(AI)的自动分割软件Contour+ (MVision AI Oy, Helsinki, Finland)的轮廓准确性,并评估其在日本患者胸部区域的临床有效性。方法:对10例胸部放疗合并肺部病变的病例进行分析。采用Contour+自动勾画双肺、气管、支气管、食道、脊髓和心脏。三名观察员使用五分制评分系统对自动轮廓进行视觉评估,最终人工校正的轮廓作为计算骰子相似系数(DSC)、豪斯多夫距离(HD)和体积差的参考。结果:在所有病例中,人工智能自动轮廓被评估为“临床可接受的轻微修改(得分≥3)”,平均得分为4.4分。肺的平均DSC值为1.00,气管为0.99,支气管为0.91,食道为0.86,脊髓为0.99,心脏为0.99,表明高度一致。支气管、食道和心脏的平均HD值分别为5.68 mm、8.72 mm和3.30 mm。手工校正后的平均体积变化为支气管4.02 cc,食道2.55 cc,心脏2.58 cc。结论:基于人工智能的自动分割软件Contour+对日本患者的主要胸部器官显示出较高的几何一致性和临床效度,提示其有可能减少轮廓化工作量,促进放射治疗计划的标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书