Danielle Beaulieu, Kelly Smith, Campbell Ross, Sylvia Yip, Tania C Felizardo, Christina Fournier, Jonathan D Glass, James D Berry, Daniel H Fowler, David L Ennist
{"title":"Development of a machine learning-based survival prediction model for ALS inclusive of the advanced-stage population.","authors":"Danielle Beaulieu, Kelly Smith, Campbell Ross, Sylvia Yip, Tania C Felizardo, Christina Fournier, Jonathan D Glass, James D Berry, Daniel H Fowler, David L Ennist","doi":"10.1080/21678421.2026.2652322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Develop a machine learning-based model for survival prediction in ALS, including advanced-stage patients (≤50% predicted normal vital capacity [VC<sub>50</sub>]).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Training data from the PRO-ACT Database (<i>n</i> = 6896) was supplemented with advanced-stage ALS patients (<i>n</i> = 678), with model validation on distinct advanced-stage ALS patients (<i>n</i> = 403). Baseline patient characteristics, including slopes from symptom onset, were used to train a random forest model to identify parameters with the greatest relative importance (RI) for predicting survival outcomes. These parameters were used to train a gradient-boosting machine (GBM) model that generated patient-level survival predictions (log-hazard). Model discrimination and calibration were quantified by C-index and calibration-in-the-large plus calibration slope, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated, with patient stratification into tertiles based on the predicted survival risk score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics with the highest RI for driving survival predictions included: VC% slope (20.2%); age (12.4%); VC% (9.9%); VC(L) (7.5%); ALSFRS-R (6.6%); and ALSFRS-R slope (5.1%). Model performance upon external validation was satisfactory for both discrimination (C-index, 0.709 [95% CI, 0.671-0.746]) and calibration (calibration-in-the-large, 0.083 [95% CI, -0.073-0.232]; calibration slope, 0.992 [95% CI, 0.789-1.198]). At 8-months from baseline, the model successfully stratified patients by survival prognosis, with low-, average-, and high-risk population tertiles having observed median survival probabilities of 85, 69, and 43%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This model accurately predicts survival prognosis in ALS, including patients with severely impaired respiratory function. This new understanding of patient-specific factors that drive survival prognostication will be invaluable for reducing patient heterogeneity in clinical trials evaluating novel therapeutic modalities in early- and advanced-stage ALS.</p>","PeriodicalId":72184,"journal":{"name":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","volume":" ","pages":"678-688"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13138003/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2026.2652322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Develop a machine learning-based model for survival prediction in ALS, including advanced-stage patients (≤50% predicted normal vital capacity [VC50]).
Methods: Training data from the PRO-ACT Database (n = 6896) was supplemented with advanced-stage ALS patients (n = 678), with model validation on distinct advanced-stage ALS patients (n = 403). Baseline patient characteristics, including slopes from symptom onset, were used to train a random forest model to identify parameters with the greatest relative importance (RI) for predicting survival outcomes. These parameters were used to train a gradient-boosting machine (GBM) model that generated patient-level survival predictions (log-hazard). Model discrimination and calibration were quantified by C-index and calibration-in-the-large plus calibration slope, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated, with patient stratification into tertiles based on the predicted survival risk score.
Results: Baseline characteristics with the highest RI for driving survival predictions included: VC% slope (20.2%); age (12.4%); VC% (9.9%); VC(L) (7.5%); ALSFRS-R (6.6%); and ALSFRS-R slope (5.1%). Model performance upon external validation was satisfactory for both discrimination (C-index, 0.709 [95% CI, 0.671-0.746]) and calibration (calibration-in-the-large, 0.083 [95% CI, -0.073-0.232]; calibration slope, 0.992 [95% CI, 0.789-1.198]). At 8-months from baseline, the model successfully stratified patients by survival prognosis, with low-, average-, and high-risk population tertiles having observed median survival probabilities of 85, 69, and 43%, respectively.
Conclusions: This model accurately predicts survival prognosis in ALS, including patients with severely impaired respiratory function. This new understanding of patient-specific factors that drive survival prognostication will be invaluable for reducing patient heterogeneity in clinical trials evaluating novel therapeutic modalities in early- and advanced-stage ALS.