On simulation, artificial intelligence, and the spirit of the Shokunin.

IF 3.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ben Symon
{"title":"On simulation, artificial intelligence, and the spirit of the Shokunin.","authors":"Ben Symon","doi":"10.1186/s41077-026-00435-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The healthcare simulation community has rapidly embraced artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs) for scenario design, delivery, and debriefing. While discussions have largely centred on efficiency and academic integrity, less attention has been paid to the philosophical and humanistic costs of this integration. This commentary explores the potential erosion of identity, expertise, and craftsmanship within simulation as cognitive labour is increasingly outsourced to machines.</p><p><strong>Main body: </strong>Drawing on the Japanese concept of the Shokunin-the devoted artisan in lifelong pursuit of mastery-the commentary contrasts the Western drive for efficiency with the intrinsic value of patient diligence and deliberate practice. Using the life and reflections of artist Katsushika Hokusai as a metaphor for the simulationist's path, the author argues that expertise is cultivated through repetition, reflection and time-qualities at risk when AI automates creative and cognitive processes. The concept of cognitive debt is introduced to describe the deferred mental cost of repeated reliance on AI, including diminished critical inquiry and weakened creative ownership. To preserve the spirit of the Shokunin, three guiding principles are proposed: (1) Know the grain of your wood before you carve-protect formative manual and reflective work early in one's career; (2) Paint first with your own brush-prioritise original human creation before seeking AI feedback; and (3) Strive for personal growth-maintain curiosity and continuous growth as enduring antidotes to automation's complacency. These principles urge simulationists to use AI as a supportive partner, not a surrogate for expertise.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI will undoubtedly enhance simulation's technical capabilities, yet it also challenges our professional identity. To sustain meaning and mastery, simulation educators must intentionally preserve spaces for imperfection, repetition, and human creativity. The spirit of the Shokunin-humble, diligent, and ever-striving-offers a moral compass for navigating the evolving partnership between simulation and artificial intelligence.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13072569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-026-00435-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The healthcare simulation community has rapidly embraced artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs) for scenario design, delivery, and debriefing. While discussions have largely centred on efficiency and academic integrity, less attention has been paid to the philosophical and humanistic costs of this integration. This commentary explores the potential erosion of identity, expertise, and craftsmanship within simulation as cognitive labour is increasingly outsourced to machines.

Main body: Drawing on the Japanese concept of the Shokunin-the devoted artisan in lifelong pursuit of mastery-the commentary contrasts the Western drive for efficiency with the intrinsic value of patient diligence and deliberate practice. Using the life and reflections of artist Katsushika Hokusai as a metaphor for the simulationist's path, the author argues that expertise is cultivated through repetition, reflection and time-qualities at risk when AI automates creative and cognitive processes. The concept of cognitive debt is introduced to describe the deferred mental cost of repeated reliance on AI, including diminished critical inquiry and weakened creative ownership. To preserve the spirit of the Shokunin, three guiding principles are proposed: (1) Know the grain of your wood before you carve-protect formative manual and reflective work early in one's career; (2) Paint first with your own brush-prioritise original human creation before seeking AI feedback; and (3) Strive for personal growth-maintain curiosity and continuous growth as enduring antidotes to automation's complacency. These principles urge simulationists to use AI as a supportive partner, not a surrogate for expertise.

Conclusion: AI will undoubtedly enhance simulation's technical capabilities, yet it also challenges our professional identity. To sustain meaning and mastery, simulation educators must intentionally preserve spaces for imperfection, repetition, and human creativity. The spirit of the Shokunin-humble, diligent, and ever-striving-offers a moral compass for navigating the evolving partnership between simulation and artificial intelligence.

关于模拟,人工智能,和将军精神。
背景:医疗保健模拟社区已经迅速采用人工智能(AI)和大型语言模型(llm)进行场景设计、交付和汇报。虽然讨论主要集中在效率和学术诚信上,但对这种整合的哲学和人文成本的关注较少。这篇评论探讨了随着认知劳动越来越多地外包给机器,模拟中身份、专业知识和工艺的潜在侵蚀。正文:本文借鉴了日本的“职民”概念,即终身追求技艺的工匠,将西方对效率的追求与耐心勤奋和刻意练习的内在价值进行了对比。作者以艺术家葛饰北斋(Katsushika Hokusai)的生活和反思作为模拟主义者道路的隐喻,认为当人工智能自动化创造性和认知过程时,专业知识是通过重复、反思和时间质量来培养的。引入认知债务的概念是为了描述反复依赖人工智能的延迟精神成本,包括批判性探究的减少和创造性所有权的削弱。为了保持“工农精神”,提出了三个指导原则:(1)在雕刻之前了解木材的纹理-保护职业生涯早期的形成手册和反思工作;(2)先用自己的画笔画画,优先考虑人类原创作品,然后再寻求人工智能的反馈;(3)为个人成长而努力——保持好奇心和持续成长,作为自动化自满的持久解毒剂。这些原则促使仿真主义者将人工智能作为支持伙伴,而不是专业知识的替代品。结论:人工智能无疑会增强模拟的技术能力,但它也会挑战我们的职业身份。为了维持意义和掌握,模拟教育者必须有意识地为不完美、重复和人类创造力保留空间。昭国的精神——谦逊、勤奋和不断奋斗——为引导模拟和人工智能之间不断发展的伙伴关系提供了道德指南针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书