Soft Tissue Augmentation at Single Implants With Collagen Matrix or Connective Tissue Graft: 7.5-Year Follow-Up of a RCT.

IF 4
Margherita G Liguori, Franz J Strauss, Thomas J W Gasser, Ronald E Jung, Nadja Naenni, Daniel S Thoma
{"title":"Soft Tissue Augmentation at Single Implants With Collagen Matrix or Connective Tissue Graft: 7.5-Year Follow-Up of a RCT.","authors":"Margherita G Liguori, Franz J Strauss, Thomas J W Gasser, Ronald E Jung, Nadja Naenni, Daniel S Thoma","doi":"10.1111/cid.70146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare up to 7.5-year clinical and patient-reported outcomes of implant sites previously augmented using a volume-stable collagen matrix (VCMX) or connective tissue graft (SCTG) in the esthetic zone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The original randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolled 20 patients who received soft tissue augmentation with VCMX or SCTG at single implant sites. Clinical assessments and standardized measurements were performed at baseline after crown insertion (BL) and at 6 months, 1, 3, 5, and 7.5 years. The primary outcome was mucosal thickness. Secondary outcomes included marginal bone levels, probing depth, bleeding on probing, plaque index, pink esthetic score (PES), OHIP-14, and buccal profilometric changes. Group comparisons were performed using mixed-effects and generalized estimating equation (GEE) models, which account for within-patient correlations due to repeated measurements and allow inclusion of all available data without requiring imputation for missing observations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 20 originally recruited patients, 12 were available for re-examination at 7.5 years (five in the SCTG group and seven in the VCMX group). Mucosal thickness at crown delivery ranged from 2 to 4 mm across the study population. Adjusted mean differences (VCMX-SCTG) in mucosal thickness were +0.70 mm at BL, -0.02 mm at 6 months, +0.1 mm at 1 year, +0.1 mm at 3 years, +0.1 mm at 5 years and -0.1 mm at 7.5 years. None of these differences reached statistical significance (p > 0.05). For all secondary outcomes, no statistically significant inter-group differences were detected (p > 0.05) except for BOP at 5 years follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both augmentation approaches achieved stable peri-implant mucosal dimensions, preserved marginal bone levels, and favorable esthetic and patient-reported outcomes over 7.5 years. Volume-stable collagen matrices might be a viable alternative to SCTG for peri-implant soft-tissue augmentation; however, adequately powered RCTs are needed to confirm these long-term observations.</p><p><strong>Trials registration: </strong>DRKS00017484.</p>","PeriodicalId":93944,"journal":{"name":"Clinical implant dentistry and related research","volume":"28 2","pages":"e70146"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13077265/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical implant dentistry and related research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.70146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To compare up to 7.5-year clinical and patient-reported outcomes of implant sites previously augmented using a volume-stable collagen matrix (VCMX) or connective tissue graft (SCTG) in the esthetic zone.

Methods: The original randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolled 20 patients who received soft tissue augmentation with VCMX or SCTG at single implant sites. Clinical assessments and standardized measurements were performed at baseline after crown insertion (BL) and at 6 months, 1, 3, 5, and 7.5 years. The primary outcome was mucosal thickness. Secondary outcomes included marginal bone levels, probing depth, bleeding on probing, plaque index, pink esthetic score (PES), OHIP-14, and buccal profilometric changes. Group comparisons were performed using mixed-effects and generalized estimating equation (GEE) models, which account for within-patient correlations due to repeated measurements and allow inclusion of all available data without requiring imputation for missing observations.

Results: Of the 20 originally recruited patients, 12 were available for re-examination at 7.5 years (five in the SCTG group and seven in the VCMX group). Mucosal thickness at crown delivery ranged from 2 to 4 mm across the study population. Adjusted mean differences (VCMX-SCTG) in mucosal thickness were +0.70 mm at BL, -0.02 mm at 6 months, +0.1 mm at 1 year, +0.1 mm at 3 years, +0.1 mm at 5 years and -0.1 mm at 7.5 years. None of these differences reached statistical significance (p > 0.05). For all secondary outcomes, no statistically significant inter-group differences were detected (p > 0.05) except for BOP at 5 years follow-up.

Conclusion: Both augmentation approaches achieved stable peri-implant mucosal dimensions, preserved marginal bone levels, and favorable esthetic and patient-reported outcomes over 7.5 years. Volume-stable collagen matrices might be a viable alternative to SCTG for peri-implant soft-tissue augmentation; however, adequately powered RCTs are needed to confirm these long-term observations.

Trials registration: DRKS00017484.

胶原基质或结缔组织单植体软组织增强:一项随机对照试验的7.5年随访。
目的:比较在美观区使用体积稳定胶原基质(VCMX)或结缔组织移植物(SCTG)增强植入部位长达7.5年的临床和患者报告的结果。方法:最初的随机对照试验(RCT)纳入了20例在单个植入部位接受VCMX或SCTG软组织增强的患者。临床评估和标准化测量分别在冠植入(BL)后6个月、1年、3年、5年和7.5年进行。主要终点是粘膜厚度。次要结果包括边缘骨水平、探诊深度、探诊出血、斑块指数、粉红色美学评分(PES)、OHIP-14和口腔轮廓变化。使用混合效应和广义估计方程(GEE)模型进行组间比较,该模型考虑了由于重复测量引起的患者内部相关性,并允许纳入所有可用数据,而无需对缺失的观察值进行代入。结果:在最初招募的20名患者中,12名患者在7.5岁时可以再次接受检查(SCTG组5名,VCMX组7名)。在整个研究人群中,冠植入时的粘膜厚度从2到4毫米不等。粘膜厚度的调整平均差异(VCMX-SCTG)在BL时为+0.70 mm, 6个月时为-0.02 mm, 1年时为+0.1 mm, 3年时为+0.1 mm, 5年时为+0.1 mm, 7.5年时为-0.1 mm。这些差异均无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。除随访5年时BOP外,其他次要指标组间差异均无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:两种隆胸方法均获得了稳定的种植体周围粘膜尺寸,保留了边缘骨水平,并在7.5年的时间里获得了良好的美学和患者报告的结果。体积稳定的胶原基质可能是种植体周围软组织增强的可行替代SCTG;然而,需要足够有力的随机对照试验来证实这些长期观察结果。试验注册:DRKS00017484。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书