[RSI in pediatric anesthesia: an online survey of actual clinical practice].

IF 1
Die Anaesthesiologie Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-13 DOI:10.1007/s00101-026-01671-5
Melanie Fieler, Marcus Nemeth, Vanessa Rigterink, Christiane E Beck
{"title":"[RSI in pediatric anesthesia: an online survey of actual clinical practice].","authors":"Melanie Fieler, Marcus Nemeth, Vanessa Rigterink, Christiane E Beck","doi":"10.1007/s00101-026-01671-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For many years, controlled rapid sequence induction (cRSI) has been recommended in children at risk of aspiration to reduce the risk of hypoxia; however, no fixed age limit has been defined for the transition to classical RSI. This study examines the current practices of RSI in children as well as controversies regarding existing approvals, recommendations and clinical guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online survey was carried out among the members of the Scientific Working Group on Pedíatric Anesthesia (WAKKA) of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 244 questionnaires could be evaluated. Of the respondents 218 were specialists and 191 respondents performed pediatric anesthesia at least once a week. For 73.4%, there was no fixed age limit for cRSI. Despite off-label-use propofol is the most frequently used hypnotic agent also in the group of premature and newborn infants and rocuronium was the most used muscle relaxant in all age groups. Pressure-controlled ventilation until intubation is performed by 80% of the respondents. The standard use of a video laryngoscope for cRSI is confirmed by 34.8% of the respondents and relaxometry is used routinely by 59.8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Controversial practices include the use of propofol in premature and newborn infants and the inconsistent use of video laryngoscopy, relaxometry, neuromuscular blocking agents, neuromuscular monitoring and mechanical pressure-controlled intermediate ventilation. The transition to classical RSI is based on individual patient circumstances regarding the risk of hypoxia. No fixed age limit could be identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":72805,"journal":{"name":"Die Anaesthesiologie","volume":" ","pages":"467-472"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Anaesthesiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-026-01671-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: For many years, controlled rapid sequence induction (cRSI) has been recommended in children at risk of aspiration to reduce the risk of hypoxia; however, no fixed age limit has been defined for the transition to classical RSI. This study examines the current practices of RSI in children as well as controversies regarding existing approvals, recommendations and clinical guidelines.

Methods: An anonymous online survey was carried out among the members of the Scientific Working Group on Pedíatric Anesthesia (WAKKA) of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI).

Results: A total of 244 questionnaires could be evaluated. Of the respondents 218 were specialists and 191 respondents performed pediatric anesthesia at least once a week. For 73.4%, there was no fixed age limit for cRSI. Despite off-label-use propofol is the most frequently used hypnotic agent also in the group of premature and newborn infants and rocuronium was the most used muscle relaxant in all age groups. Pressure-controlled ventilation until intubation is performed by 80% of the respondents. The standard use of a video laryngoscope for cRSI is confirmed by 34.8% of the respondents and relaxometry is used routinely by 59.8%.

Conclusion: Controversial practices include the use of propofol in premature and newborn infants and the inconsistent use of video laryngoscopy, relaxometry, neuromuscular blocking agents, neuromuscular monitoring and mechanical pressure-controlled intermediate ventilation. The transition to classical RSI is based on individual patient circumstances regarding the risk of hypoxia. No fixed age limit could be identified.

[儿童麻醉中的RSI:实际临床实践的在线调查]。
背景:多年来,控制快速序列诱导(cRSI)一直被推荐用于有误吸风险的儿童,以降低缺氧的风险;然而,对于向经典重复性劳损的过渡,没有确定固定的年龄限制。本研究考察了目前儿童RSI的实践,以及关于现有批准、建议和临床指南的争议。方法:对德国麻醉与重症监护医学学会(DGAI) Pedíatric麻醉科学工作组(WAKKA)成员进行匿名在线调查。结果:共发放问卷244份。在受访者中,218名是专家,191名受访者每周至少进行一次儿科麻醉。73.4%的人没有固定的cRSI年龄限制。尽管标签外使用异丙酚是最常用的催眠剂,早产儿和新生儿也是最常用的催眠剂,罗库溴铵是所有年龄组中最常用的肌肉松弛剂。80%的应答者进行压力控制通气直到插管。34.8%的受访者确认标准使用视频喉镜检查cRSI, 59.8%的受访者常规使用松弛法。结论:有争议的做法包括早产儿和新生儿使用异丙酚,以及视频喉镜、松弛仪、神经肌肉阻断剂、神经肌肉监测和机械压力控制中间通气的不一致使用。向经典重复性劳损的转变是基于个体患者缺氧风险的情况。没有确定固定的年龄限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书