Evaluating the Quality and Reliability of Hepatitis B-Related Short Videos on BiliBili and TikTok: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Bowen Cheng, Wenjie Shi, Shu Wang, Huanbing Liu, Jing Xiong, Xiaoyan Chen
{"title":"Evaluating the Quality and Reliability of Hepatitis B-Related Short Videos on BiliBili and TikTok: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Bowen Cheng, Wenjie Shi, Shu Wang, Huanbing Liu, Jing Xiong, Xiaoyan Chen","doi":"10.1177/00469580261441434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hepatitis B is a significant global health concern and poses a substantial burden on public health systems. Short video platforms such as TikTok and Bilibili have become important channels for health information dissemination. However, the quality and reliability of Hepatitis B-related content on these platforms remain unclear. The objective of our research is to evaluate the quality of information regarding Hepatitis B disseminated on the TikTok and Bilibili short video platforms. On April 1, 2025, we systematically collected the top 100 Hepatitis B-related short videos from TikTok and Bilibili, totaling 200 videos. Basic video information was extracted, and video quality and reliability were assessed using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), and JAMA benchmarks. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to examine the relationship between engagement metrics and quality scores. TikTok videos demonstrated greater user engagement, as evidenced by higher metrics for likes, comments, and shares, and also achieved superior reliability scores compared to Bilibili. Specifically, the median reliability scores for TikTok videos were mDISCERN: 4 (3-4) and JAMA: 3 (3-3), whereas for Bilibili videos, these scores were mDISCERN: 3 (3-4) and JAMA: 2 (2-3). In terms of content quality, as assessed by the GQS, both platforms exhibited similar levels (TikTok: 4 [3-4], Bilibili: 4 [3-4]). Additionally, videos uploaded by hepatologists consistently showed higher quality and reliability. Spearman correlation analysis indicated significant but weak positive correlations between engagement metrics (likes, comments, shares, saves) and both GQS and JAMA scores; however, no significant correlation was observed with mDISCERN scores. The overall quality and reliability of Hepatitis B-related short videos were moderate, with TikTok videos outperforming Bilibili videos in reliability. Videos created by hepatologists demonstrated higher quality and reliability. We recommend that the public exercise caution when consuming health information from short videos to avoid potential misinformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":"63 ","pages":"469580261441434"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13080156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580261441434","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hepatitis B is a significant global health concern and poses a substantial burden on public health systems. Short video platforms such as TikTok and Bilibili have become important channels for health information dissemination. However, the quality and reliability of Hepatitis B-related content on these platforms remain unclear. The objective of our research is to evaluate the quality of information regarding Hepatitis B disseminated on the TikTok and Bilibili short video platforms. On April 1, 2025, we systematically collected the top 100 Hepatitis B-related short videos from TikTok and Bilibili, totaling 200 videos. Basic video information was extracted, and video quality and reliability were assessed using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), and JAMA benchmarks. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to examine the relationship between engagement metrics and quality scores. TikTok videos demonstrated greater user engagement, as evidenced by higher metrics for likes, comments, and shares, and also achieved superior reliability scores compared to Bilibili. Specifically, the median reliability scores for TikTok videos were mDISCERN: 4 (3-4) and JAMA: 3 (3-3), whereas for Bilibili videos, these scores were mDISCERN: 3 (3-4) and JAMA: 2 (2-3). In terms of content quality, as assessed by the GQS, both platforms exhibited similar levels (TikTok: 4 [3-4], Bilibili: 4 [3-4]). Additionally, videos uploaded by hepatologists consistently showed higher quality and reliability. Spearman correlation analysis indicated significant but weak positive correlations between engagement metrics (likes, comments, shares, saves) and both GQS and JAMA scores; however, no significant correlation was observed with mDISCERN scores. The overall quality and reliability of Hepatitis B-related short videos were moderate, with TikTok videos outperforming Bilibili videos in reliability. Videos created by hepatologists demonstrated higher quality and reliability. We recommend that the public exercise caution when consuming health information from short videos to avoid potential misinformation.

评估BiliBili和TikTok上乙肝相关短视频的质量和可靠性:一项横断面研究。
乙型肝炎是一个重大的全球卫生问题,对公共卫生系统造成重大负担。抖音、哔哩哔哩等短视频平台已成为健康信息传播的重要渠道。然而,这些平台上乙肝相关内容的质量和可靠性仍不清楚。我们的研究目的是评估在抖音和哔哩哔哩短视频平台上传播的乙肝信息的质量。2025年4月1日,我们系统收集了抖音和哔哩哔哩上排名前100位的乙肝相关短视频,共计200个视频。提取基本视频信息,并使用全球质量量表(GQS)、改进的DISCERN (mDISCERN)和JAMA基准评估视频质量和可靠性。采用Spearman相关分析来检验敬业度指标与质量分数之间的关系。抖音视频表现出更高的用户参与度,点赞、评论和分享的指标更高,而且与Bilibili相比,它的可靠性得分也更高。具体来说,TikTok视频的中位数可靠性得分为mDISCERN: 4(3-4)和JAMA: 3(3-3),而Bilibili视频的中位数可靠性得分为mDISCERN: 3(3-4)和JAMA: 2(2-3)。在内容质量方面,根据GQS的评估,两个平台表现出相似的水平(TikTok: 4 [3-4], Bilibili: 4[3-4])。此外,肝病专家上传的视频始终显示出更高的质量和可靠性。Spearman相关分析显示,用户粘性指标(喜欢、评论、分享、保存)与GQS和JAMA得分之间存在显著但微弱的正相关;然而,与mDISCERN评分没有显著的相关性。乙肝相关短视频整体质量和可靠性一般,抖音视频可靠性优于哔哩哔哩视频。肝病学家制作的视频显示出更高的质量和可靠性。我们建议公众在从短视频中获取健康信息时要谨慎,以避免潜在的错误信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: INQUIRY is a peer-reviewed open access journal whose msision is to to improve health by sharing research spanning health care, including public health, health services, and health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书