Perceptions of Patients and Health Professionals Regarding the Experience of Patients With a Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation Program.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Research in Nursing & Health Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-13 DOI:10.1002/nur.70072
Pamela Tanguay, Nicole Marquis, Alexandra Ethier, Jennifer Hakim, Monique Dufour Doiron, Gaétan Thériault, Michel Leblanc, Marie-Andrée Giroux, Mathieu Bélanger
{"title":"Perceptions of Patients and Health Professionals Regarding the Experience of Patients With a Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation Program.","authors":"Pamela Tanguay, Nicole Marquis, Alexandra Ethier, Jennifer Hakim, Monique Dufour Doiron, Gaétan Thériault, Michel Leblanc, Marie-Andrée Giroux, Mathieu Bélanger","doi":"10.1002/nur.70072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hybrid cardiac rehabilitation (HCR), which combines supervised center-based and monitored home-based exercise programs, gained popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic. While HCR appears to be as effective as standard cardiac rehabilitation, patients' experiences within these programs remain largely unexplored. This study aimed to explore program participants' (PP) perceptions and healthcare professionals' (HP) impressions of PP' experiences with HCR. A qualitative descriptive design was used. Audio-recorded semi-structured interviews were conducted with PP and HP, who had experience with HCR. Data were analyzed thematically. Interviews with PP (n = 16) and HP (n = 12) revealed four main themes: having fewer sessions at the center reduces accessibility barriers; going to the center provides a chance to connect with others; feeling safe in a supervised environment helps regain confidence; and going through the program supports progress through the stages of behavior change. The HCR program was perceived as convenient, primarily because it required fewer trips to the center. The program helped PP overcome feelings of social isolation, and the center was perceived as a safe environment where PP could test their physical limits. The HCR program raised awareness of their eating habits and physical activity through education. Overall, PP' experiences with HCR were positive and aligned with HP' impressions. Since PP primarily emphasized the benefits of the in-center sessions, the benefits of this component should not be overlooked.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":"520-528"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13539701/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.70072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hybrid cardiac rehabilitation (HCR), which combines supervised center-based and monitored home-based exercise programs, gained popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic. While HCR appears to be as effective as standard cardiac rehabilitation, patients' experiences within these programs remain largely unexplored. This study aimed to explore program participants' (PP) perceptions and healthcare professionals' (HP) impressions of PP' experiences with HCR. A qualitative descriptive design was used. Audio-recorded semi-structured interviews were conducted with PP and HP, who had experience with HCR. Data were analyzed thematically. Interviews with PP (n = 16) and HP (n = 12) revealed four main themes: having fewer sessions at the center reduces accessibility barriers; going to the center provides a chance to connect with others; feeling safe in a supervised environment helps regain confidence; and going through the program supports progress through the stages of behavior change. The HCR program was perceived as convenient, primarily because it required fewer trips to the center. The program helped PP overcome feelings of social isolation, and the center was perceived as a safe environment where PP could test their physical limits. The HCR program raised awareness of their eating habits and physical activity through education. Overall, PP' experiences with HCR were positive and aligned with HP' impressions. Since PP primarily emphasized the benefits of the in-center sessions, the benefits of this component should not be overlooked.

患者和卫生专业人员对混合心脏康复方案患者经验的看法。
混合心脏康复(HCR)结合了监督中心和监测家庭的锻炼计划,在COVID-19大流行期间受到欢迎。虽然HCR似乎与标准心脏康复一样有效,但患者在这些项目中的经历在很大程度上仍未被探索。本研究旨在探讨项目参与者(PP)的感知和医疗保健专业人员(HP)的印象PP的经验与HCR。采用定性描述设计。对具有HCR经验的PP和HP进行了录音半结构化访谈。数据按主题进行分析。对PP (n = 16)和HP (n = 12)的访谈揭示了四个主要主题:减少在中心的会议减少了无障碍障碍;去中心提供了一个与他人联系的机会;在有监督的环境中感到安全有助于重拾信心;通过这个项目可以帮助你在行为改变的各个阶段取得进步。HCR计划被认为是方便的,主要是因为它需要更少的往返中心。这个项目帮助PP克服了社会孤立的感觉,中心被认为是一个安全的环境,PP可以测试他们的身体极限。HCR项目通过教育提高了人们对他们饮食习惯和体育活动的认识。总的来说,PP对HCR的体验是积极的,与HP的印象一致。由于PP主要强调了中心会话的好处,因此不应忽视该组件的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书