Physical Activity Pattern among Health Care Professionals and its Barriers: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 0.8 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Nijin Shaji Leonit Shaji, Abinaya Dhandapani, Abhinaya Selvaraj, Sudha Ramalingam
{"title":"Physical Activity Pattern among Health Care Professionals and its Barriers: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Nijin Shaji Leonit Shaji, Abinaya Dhandapani, Abhinaya Selvaraj, Sudha Ramalingam","doi":"10.4103/ijoem.ijoem_268_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare professionals are widely regarded as role models for healthy living. Yet, despite being equipped with medical knowledge, they often face significant barriers to maintaining adequate physical activity, compromising their health and capacity to promote wellness among patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess physical activity patterns among doctors in the tertiary hospital in Coimbatore, India, and to identify barriers influencing their participation in regular physical activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2024 to June 2025 among 152 doctors using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-Short Form) alongside structured tools to assess barriers, lifestyle, and personal habits. Physical activity was quantified in MET-minutes/week and categorized into low, moderate, and high levels. Associations with lifestyle factors were analyzed using chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A majority (72.4%) of participants were classified as highly active, 20.4% as moderately active, and 7.2% as having low physical activity. Lack of time (72.4%) was the most cited barrier, followed by lack of energy (36.9%) and inadequate access to facilities (23%). Statistically significant associations were observed between physical activity levels and frequency of eating out (<i>P</i> < 0.001), vegetable intake (<i>P</i> = 0.021), and sleep duration (<i>P</i> = 0.026).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite high physical activity levels among most doctors, substantial barriers persist that impede regular exercise. Institutional strategies targeting time constraints, fatigue, and facility access may enhance the sustainability of physical activity among medical professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":43585,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":"30 1","pages":"30-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13064968/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijoem.ijoem_268_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Healthcare professionals are widely regarded as role models for healthy living. Yet, despite being equipped with medical knowledge, they often face significant barriers to maintaining adequate physical activity, compromising their health and capacity to promote wellness among patients.

Objectives: To assess physical activity patterns among doctors in the tertiary hospital in Coimbatore, India, and to identify barriers influencing their participation in regular physical activity.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2024 to June 2025 among 152 doctors using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-Short Form) alongside structured tools to assess barriers, lifestyle, and personal habits. Physical activity was quantified in MET-minutes/week and categorized into low, moderate, and high levels. Associations with lifestyle factors were analyzed using chi-square tests.

Results: A majority (72.4%) of participants were classified as highly active, 20.4% as moderately active, and 7.2% as having low physical activity. Lack of time (72.4%) was the most cited barrier, followed by lack of energy (36.9%) and inadequate access to facilities (23%). Statistically significant associations were observed between physical activity levels and frequency of eating out (P < 0.001), vegetable intake (P = 0.021), and sleep duration (P = 0.026).

Conclusion: Despite high physical activity levels among most doctors, substantial barriers persist that impede regular exercise. Institutional strategies targeting time constraints, fatigue, and facility access may enhance the sustainability of physical activity among medical professionals.

卫生保健专业人员的身体活动模式及其障碍:一项横断面研究。
背景:医疗保健专业人员被广泛认为是健康生活的榜样。然而,尽管具备了医学知识,她们往往在保持适当的身体活动方面面临重大障碍,从而损害了她们的健康和促进患者健康的能力。目的:评估印度哥印拜陀三级医院医生的身体活动模式,并确定影响他们参加定期身体活动的障碍。方法:从2024年12月到2025年6月,对152名医生进行了一项横断面研究,使用国际体育活动问卷(IPAQ-Short Form)以及结构化工具来评估障碍、生活方式和个人习惯。身体活动以met分钟/周为单位进行量化,并分为低、中、高水平。用卡方检验分析与生活方式因素的关系。结果:大多数(72.4%)的参与者被归类为高度活跃,20.4%为中度活跃,7.2%为低体力活动。缺乏时间(72.4%)是被提及最多的障碍,其次是缺乏精力(36.9%)和设施不足(23%)。体力活动水平与外出就餐频率(P < 0.001)、蔬菜摄入量(P = 0.021)和睡眠时间(P = 0.026)之间存在统计学上显著的关联。结论:尽管大多数医生的身体活动水平很高,但阻碍定期锻炼的实质性障碍仍然存在。针对时间限制、疲劳和设施使用的机构战略可以增强医疗专业人员体育活动的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The website of Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine aims to make the printed version of the journal available to the scientific community on the web. The site is purely for educational purpose of the medical community. The site does not cater to the needs of individual patients and is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her existing physician.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书