A Conceptual Framework for Ergonomic Interventions in a Bangladeshi Metal Workshop to Reduce Musculoskeletal Disorders.

IF 0.8 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Md Mushiur Rahman, Mir Md Mofachel Hossain, Md Mohibul Islam, Aizizul Haque Raza
{"title":"A Conceptual Framework for Ergonomic Interventions in a Bangladeshi Metal Workshop to Reduce Musculoskeletal Disorders.","authors":"Md Mushiur Rahman, Mir Md Mofachel Hossain, Md Mohibul Islam, Aizizul Haque Raza","doi":"10.4103/ijoem.ijoem_23_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study develops a conceptual framework for ergonomic interventions aimed at reducing musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) among workers in metal workshops in Bangladesh. Workers in this sector frequently adopt awkward postures such as deep squatting, bending, and prolonged sitting, which significantly increase the risk of MSDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ergonomic assessments were conducted using RULA, REBA, OWAS, and spinal compression analysis, supported by digital human modeling techniques in CATIA and Tecnomatix Jack. The design of ergonomic chairs and height-adjustable workbenches was based on anthropometric measurements collected from 200 male participants aged 18 to 41 years, ensuring compatibility with local body dimensions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings revealed that standing and sitting postures facilitated by appropriately designed ergonomic furniture reduce biomechanical stress compared to the deep squatting postures commonly used during welding and grinding activities. In welding operations, standing yielded the lowest RULA, REBA, and OWAS scores, whereas sitting resulted in the minimum spinal compression. For grinding tasks, standing provided the most favorable ergonomic risk scores, while sitting effectively reduced spinal loads. These postural improvements demonstrate the value of ergonomics-based workstation redesign in minimizing MSD risk factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the results, customized ergonomic guidelines were developed, recommending standing as the primary working posture and sitting as a secondary alternative to alleviate fatigue. The proposed framework offers a practical and cost-effective approach for assisting small- and medium-sized enterprises in Bangladesh in reducing MSD risks, improving worker comfort, and enhancing productivity. Although the interventions have not yet been tested in operational workshop environments, further research is recommended to implement and evaluate these ergonomic solutions in real-world settings to determine their long-term effects on employee health and work efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":43585,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":"30 1","pages":"80-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13064952/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijoem.ijoem_23_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study develops a conceptual framework for ergonomic interventions aimed at reducing musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) among workers in metal workshops in Bangladesh. Workers in this sector frequently adopt awkward postures such as deep squatting, bending, and prolonged sitting, which significantly increase the risk of MSDs.

Methods: Ergonomic assessments were conducted using RULA, REBA, OWAS, and spinal compression analysis, supported by digital human modeling techniques in CATIA and Tecnomatix Jack. The design of ergonomic chairs and height-adjustable workbenches was based on anthropometric measurements collected from 200 male participants aged 18 to 41 years, ensuring compatibility with local body dimensions.

Results: The findings revealed that standing and sitting postures facilitated by appropriately designed ergonomic furniture reduce biomechanical stress compared to the deep squatting postures commonly used during welding and grinding activities. In welding operations, standing yielded the lowest RULA, REBA, and OWAS scores, whereas sitting resulted in the minimum spinal compression. For grinding tasks, standing provided the most favorable ergonomic risk scores, while sitting effectively reduced spinal loads. These postural improvements demonstrate the value of ergonomics-based workstation redesign in minimizing MSD risk factors.

Conclusions: Based on the results, customized ergonomic guidelines were developed, recommending standing as the primary working posture and sitting as a secondary alternative to alleviate fatigue. The proposed framework offers a practical and cost-effective approach for assisting small- and medium-sized enterprises in Bangladesh in reducing MSD risks, improving worker comfort, and enhancing productivity. Although the interventions have not yet been tested in operational workshop environments, further research is recommended to implement and evaluate these ergonomic solutions in real-world settings to determine their long-term effects on employee health and work efficiency.

孟加拉金属车间减少肌肉骨骼疾病的人体工程学干预的概念框架。
背景:本研究开发了一个人体工程学干预的概念框架,旨在减少孟加拉国金属车间工人的肌肉骨骼疾病(MSDs)。这个部门的工人经常采取尴尬的姿势,如深蹲、弯腰和长时间坐着,这大大增加了MSDs的风险。方法:采用RULA、REBA、OWAS和脊柱压缩分析进行人体工程学评估,并辅以CATIA和Tecnomatix Jack中的数字人体建模技术。符合人体工程学的椅子和可调节高度的工作台的设计是基于200名年龄在18至41岁之间的男性参与者的人体测量数据,以确保与当地身体尺寸的兼容性。结果:研究结果表明,与焊接和磨削活动中常用的深蹲姿势相比,适当设计的人体工程学家具促进的站立和坐姿可以减少生物力学应力。在焊接操作中,站立产生最低的RULA、REBA和OWAS评分,而坐着导致最小的脊柱压迫。对于磨削任务,站立提供最有利的人体工程学风险评分,而坐着有效地减少脊柱负荷。这些姿势的改善证明了基于人体工程学的工作站重新设计在最小化MSD风险因素方面的价值。结论:根据研究结果,制定了定制的人体工程学指南,建议站立作为主要工作姿势,坐着作为缓解疲劳的次要选择。拟议的框架为协助孟加拉国中小型企业减少MSD风险、改善工人舒适度和提高生产率提供了一种切实可行和具有成本效益的方法。虽然这些干预措施尚未在车间操作环境中进行测试,但建议进行进一步研究,以便在实际环境中实施和评估这些符合人体工程学的解决方案,以确定它们对员工健康和工作效率的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The website of Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine aims to make the printed version of the journal available to the scientific community on the web. The site is purely for educational purpose of the medical community. The site does not cater to the needs of individual patients and is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her existing physician.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书