Self-adhesive mesh versus tacker-fixed polypropylene in transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: An observational cohort analysis of recurrence rates.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Nathalí Bencosme, Andres Trujillo, Cindy Franco, Daniel Mera, Frederico Santiago, Gabrielle David, Guilherme Cotta
{"title":"Self-adhesive mesh versus tacker-fixed polypropylene in transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: An observational cohort analysis of recurrence rates.","authors":"Nathalí Bencosme, Andres Trujillo, Cindy Franco, Daniel Mera, Frederico Santiago, Gabrielle David, Guilherme Cotta","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_433_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laparoscopic repair has become the preferred approach for inguinal hernia due to its lower post-operative morbidity and faster recovery. However, the choice of mesh fixation remains a topic of debate. Self-adhesive meshes were developed to eliminate the need for mechanical fixation, aiming to reduce post-operative pain, though their long-term outcomes compared to traditional tacker fixation are still under investigation. This study aimed to compare recurrence rates and post-operative outcomes between self-adhesive and tacker-fixed polypropylene meshes in transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>An observational cohort study including 400 patients who underwent TAPP laparoscopic repair between 2018 and 2023 in hospitals across Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Demographic variables, hernia laterality, mesh type, complications and recurrence were recorded. Fisher's exact test and linear regression were used. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Follow-up was 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample consisted predominantly of males (89.5%), with bilateral hernias being the most common presentation (51.25%). Self-adhesive mesh was used in 72.5% of cases, and polypropylene mesh with tacker fixation in 27.5%. The overall recurrence rate was 6%, with no significant difference between mesh types (P = 0.249). The global complication rate was 4.25%, mainly post-operative pain (3.0%) and seroma (0.75%), with no significant differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Self-adhesive and tacker-fixed polypropylene meshes demonstrated comparable recurrence and complication rates in TAPP repair. Self-adhesive meshes remain a safe alternative that eliminates the need for mechanical fixation, although longer follow-up studies are required to assess late recurrence and long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_433_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Laparoscopic repair has become the preferred approach for inguinal hernia due to its lower post-operative morbidity and faster recovery. However, the choice of mesh fixation remains a topic of debate. Self-adhesive meshes were developed to eliminate the need for mechanical fixation, aiming to reduce post-operative pain, though their long-term outcomes compared to traditional tacker fixation are still under investigation. This study aimed to compare recurrence rates and post-operative outcomes between self-adhesive and tacker-fixed polypropylene meshes in transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair.

Patients and methods: An observational cohort study including 400 patients who underwent TAPP laparoscopic repair between 2018 and 2023 in hospitals across Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Demographic variables, hernia laterality, mesh type, complications and recurrence were recorded. Fisher's exact test and linear regression were used. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Follow-up was 3 months.

Results: The sample consisted predominantly of males (89.5%), with bilateral hernias being the most common presentation (51.25%). Self-adhesive mesh was used in 72.5% of cases, and polypropylene mesh with tacker fixation in 27.5%. The overall recurrence rate was 6%, with no significant difference between mesh types (P = 0.249). The global complication rate was 4.25%, mainly post-operative pain (3.0%) and seroma (0.75%), with no significant differences between groups.

Conclusions: Self-adhesive and tacker-fixed polypropylene meshes demonstrated comparable recurrence and complication rates in TAPP repair. Self-adhesive meshes remain a safe alternative that eliminates the need for mechanical fixation, although longer follow-up studies are required to assess late recurrence and long-term outcomes.

经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中自粘补片与粘钉固定聚丙烯的对比:复发率的观察队列分析。
腹腔镜修补术因其术后发病率低、恢复快而成为治疗腹股沟疝的首选方法。然而,网状固定的选择仍然是一个有争议的话题。自粘网的开发是为了消除机械固定的需要,旨在减少术后疼痛,尽管与传统的粘钉固定相比,其长期效果仍在研究中。本研究旨在比较自粘和粘钉固定聚丙烯网片在经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的复发率和术后结果。患者和方法:一项观察性队列研究,包括2018年至2023年在巴西里约热内卢的医院接受TAPP腹腔镜修复的400名患者。记录人口统计学变量、疝侧边、补片类型、并发症及复发情况。采用Fisher精确检验和线性回归。P≤0.05被认为是显著的。随访3个月。结果:样本以男性为主(89.5%),双侧疝是最常见的表现(51.25%)。72.5%的病例使用自粘网片,27.5%的病例使用聚丙烯网片加粘钉固定。总复发率为6%,不同补片类型的复发率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.249)。总体并发症发生率为4.25%,主要为术后疼痛(3.0%)和血清肿(0.75%),组间差异无统计学意义。结论:在TAPP修复中,自粘和粘钉固定聚丙烯网片的复发率和并发症发生率相当。尽管需要更长的随访研究来评估晚期复发和长期结果,但自粘网仍然是一种安全的替代方案,无需机械固定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Minimal Access Surgery (JMAS), the official publication of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons, launched in early 2005. The JMAS, a quarterly publication, is the first English-language journal from India, as also from this part of the world, dedicated to Minimal Access Surgery. The JMAS boasts an outstanding editorial board comprising of Indian and international experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书