Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of the French Version of the Low Literacy Decisional Conflict Scale in Adolescents.

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
MDM Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2026-04-08 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23814683261438738
Dehlia Moussaoui, Victoria L Crofts, Nicolas Silvestrini, Thomas Agoritsas, Arnaud Merglen, Michal Yaron
{"title":"Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of the French Version of the Low Literacy Decisional Conflict Scale in Adolescents.","authors":"Dehlia Moussaoui, Victoria L Crofts, Nicolas Silvestrini, Thomas Agoritsas, Arnaud Merglen, Michal Yaron","doi":"10.1177/23814683261438738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose.</b> We aimed 1) to translate and adapt the English version of Low Literacy Decisional Conflict Scale (LL-DCS) into French and 2) to assess its psychometric properties in adolescents. <b>Methods.</b> The original LL-DCS was translated into French by 2 independent translators, with discrepancies resolved by a multidisciplinary team. The reconciled version was back-translated into English by 2 other translators to ensure accuracy. We tested the prefinal version among 14 adolescents, who evaluated the clarity of the items. Second, we conducted psychometric testing of the final version among 85 adolescents participating in a pilot study evaluating a decision aid for contraception and menstrual management. Participants completed the French version of LL-DCS before (T0) and after (T1) their clinical encounter. We assessed internal consistency with Cronbach's alphas and model fit with confirmatory factorial analyses. We evaluated discriminant validity by comparing scores at T0 and T1 based on participants' responses regarding treatment preference. <b>Results.</b> Internal consistency of the French LL-DCS was acceptable, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.72 at both T0 and T1, although there was variability in reliability at the subscale level. Model fit was adequate at T0, indicating good factor validity. There was evidence for the original 4-factor model at T0, but exploratory analysis suggested a 3-factor solution with Informed and Values Clarity as one factor. Discriminant validity was strong, as the scale distinguished between adolescents who had decided on treatment and those who remained undecided. <b>Conclusion.</b> The French version of the LL-DCS demonstrates satisfactory psychometric properties, including internal consistency, factor validity, and discriminant validity. However, caution should be exercised when interpreting individual subscales, as their internal consistency is somewhat lower than the original English version of LL-DCS.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>We translated, adapted, and tested the French version of Low Literacy Decisional Conflict Scale in adolescents.The French version of the Low Literacy Decisional Conflict Scale is adapted to people with limited literacy skills.We hope that it might facilitate the participation of vulnerable populations in clinical research projects.</p>","PeriodicalId":36567,"journal":{"name":"MDM Policy and Practice","volume":"11 1","pages":"23814683261438738"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13065280/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MDM Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683261438738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. We aimed 1) to translate and adapt the English version of Low Literacy Decisional Conflict Scale (LL-DCS) into French and 2) to assess its psychometric properties in adolescents. Methods. The original LL-DCS was translated into French by 2 independent translators, with discrepancies resolved by a multidisciplinary team. The reconciled version was back-translated into English by 2 other translators to ensure accuracy. We tested the prefinal version among 14 adolescents, who evaluated the clarity of the items. Second, we conducted psychometric testing of the final version among 85 adolescents participating in a pilot study evaluating a decision aid for contraception and menstrual management. Participants completed the French version of LL-DCS before (T0) and after (T1) their clinical encounter. We assessed internal consistency with Cronbach's alphas and model fit with confirmatory factorial analyses. We evaluated discriminant validity by comparing scores at T0 and T1 based on participants' responses regarding treatment preference. Results. Internal consistency of the French LL-DCS was acceptable, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.72 at both T0 and T1, although there was variability in reliability at the subscale level. Model fit was adequate at T0, indicating good factor validity. There was evidence for the original 4-factor model at T0, but exploratory analysis suggested a 3-factor solution with Informed and Values Clarity as one factor. Discriminant validity was strong, as the scale distinguished between adolescents who had decided on treatment and those who remained undecided. Conclusion. The French version of the LL-DCS demonstrates satisfactory psychometric properties, including internal consistency, factor validity, and discriminant validity. However, caution should be exercised when interpreting individual subscales, as their internal consistency is somewhat lower than the original English version of LL-DCS.

Highlights: We translated, adapted, and tested the French version of Low Literacy Decisional Conflict Scale in adolescents.The French version of the Low Literacy Decisional Conflict Scale is adapted to people with limited literacy skills.We hope that it might facilitate the participation of vulnerable populations in clinical research projects.

青少年低读写能力决策冲突量表法语版的翻译、改编与验证。
目的。本研究的目的是1)将英语版本的《低读写能力决策冲突量表》(Low Literacy Decisional Conflict Scale, LL-DCS)翻译成法语并进行改编;2)评估其在青少年中的心理测量特性。方法。最初的LL-DCS由2名独立翻译人员翻译成法语,差异由一个多学科小组解决。为了确保准确性,另外两名翻译人员将修订后的版本重新翻译成英文。我们在14名青少年中测试了预决版本,他们评估了项目的清晰度。其次,我们对85名青少年进行了最终版本的心理测量测试,这些青少年参与了一项评估避孕和月经管理决策辅助的试点研究。参与者在临床接触之前(T0)和之后(T1)完成法语版本的LL-DCS。我们用Cronbach's alpha评估内部一致性,用验证性因子分析评估模型拟合。我们根据参与者对治疗偏好的反应,通过比较T0和T1时的得分来评估区分效度。结果。法国LL-DCS的内部一致性是可以接受的,在T0和T1时的Cronbach's alpha均为0.72,尽管在子量表水平上的信度存在可变性。模型拟合在T0时足够,表明因子效度良好。在T0时,有证据表明原来的4因素模型,但探索性分析表明,以知情和价值清晰度为一个因素的3因素解决方案。鉴别效度很强,因为量表区分了已决定接受治疗的青少年和尚未决定接受治疗的青少年。结论。法语版本的LL-DCS表现出令人满意的心理测量特性,包括内部一致性、因素效度和区别效度。但是,在解释单个子量表时应谨慎,因为它们的内部一致性略低于原英文版本的LL-DCS。重点:我们翻译、改编并测试了法语版的青少年低识字率决策冲突量表。法语版的低读写能力决策冲突量表适用于读写能力有限的人。我们希望它能促进弱势群体参与临床研究项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MDM Policy and Practice
MDM Policy and Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书