{"title":"Unveiling toxicological adverse outcomes: toward construction and simulation of large-scale networks.","authors":"Nensi Ikonomi, Natalie Ketter, Mario A A Pepe","doi":"10.1093/toxsci/kfag043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Predicting toxicological adverse outcomes is crucial for advancing in silico toxicology strategies. Modern toxicology increasingly relies on systems biology approaches to model and interpret these outcomes. Adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) focus on systems-level descriptions and causal linear relations among initiating, key, and adverse outcome events. Key characteristics (KC)-based topologies capture mechanistic breadth via interconnected property-based modules without assuming linear causality. From another perspective, emerging physiological maps dive deeper into toxicological mechanisms by mapping them at the detailed molecular level. To capture the dynamic nature of toxicological responses, especially their time- and dose-dependent behaviors, there is growing interest in integrating systems biology and mathematical modeling strategies. Although dynamic models have been applied to small-scale AOPs, larger regulatory networks remain largely unexplored from a dynamic perspective. In this review, we highlight recent efforts to combine systems and network biology approaches for predicting toxicological adverse outcomes, covering network construction, analysis, and dynamic predictions. We also explore the aspect of dynamically simulating large-scale molecular networks and its potential contribution to systems toxicology. Specifically, we charter the use of logic-based models (Boolean networks) as an integrative approach to understand molecular crosstalk and cellular phenotypes, highlighting the potential repurpose of existing models. To this end, we show 2 use cases on toxicological applications of Boolean network models. Finally, we prospectively discuss the importance and need of bridging molecular and systemic scales and integrating these modeling strategies with high-dimensional data sources, including omics and multi-omics datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":23178,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13120877/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfag043","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Predicting toxicological adverse outcomes is crucial for advancing in silico toxicology strategies. Modern toxicology increasingly relies on systems biology approaches to model and interpret these outcomes. Adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) focus on systems-level descriptions and causal linear relations among initiating, key, and adverse outcome events. Key characteristics (KC)-based topologies capture mechanistic breadth via interconnected property-based modules without assuming linear causality. From another perspective, emerging physiological maps dive deeper into toxicological mechanisms by mapping them at the detailed molecular level. To capture the dynamic nature of toxicological responses, especially their time- and dose-dependent behaviors, there is growing interest in integrating systems biology and mathematical modeling strategies. Although dynamic models have been applied to small-scale AOPs, larger regulatory networks remain largely unexplored from a dynamic perspective. In this review, we highlight recent efforts to combine systems and network biology approaches for predicting toxicological adverse outcomes, covering network construction, analysis, and dynamic predictions. We also explore the aspect of dynamically simulating large-scale molecular networks and its potential contribution to systems toxicology. Specifically, we charter the use of logic-based models (Boolean networks) as an integrative approach to understand molecular crosstalk and cellular phenotypes, highlighting the potential repurpose of existing models. To this end, we show 2 use cases on toxicological applications of Boolean network models. Finally, we prospectively discuss the importance and need of bridging molecular and systemic scales and integrating these modeling strategies with high-dimensional data sources, including omics and multi-omics datasets.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Toxicological Sciences, the official journal of the Society of Toxicology, is to publish a broad spectrum of impactful research in the field of toxicology.
The primary focus of Toxicological Sciences is on original research articles. The journal also provides expert insight via contemporary and systematic reviews, as well as forum articles and editorial content that addresses important topics in the field.
The scope of Toxicological Sciences is focused on a broad spectrum of impactful toxicological research that will advance the multidisciplinary field of toxicology ranging from basic research to model development and application, and decision making. Submissions will include diverse technologies and approaches including, but not limited to: bioinformatics and computational biology, biochemistry, exposure science, histopathology, mass spectrometry, molecular biology, population-based sciences, tissue and cell-based systems, and whole-animal studies. Integrative approaches that combine realistic exposure scenarios with impactful analyses that move the field forward are encouraged.