{"title":"Leadless Pacemaker for Sinus Pauses and Syncope in Pregnancy: A Feasible Alternative to Conventional Pacing.","authors":"Miki Yokokawa, Shaurya Srivasta, Ali H Sheikh","doi":"10.19102/icrm.2026.17032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bradyarrhythmias with syncope during pregnancy present a complex and multifaceted challenge for both patients and health care providers. When device implantation is indicated for bradyarrhythmia-associated syncope during pregnancy, the procedure should be performed with particular attention to minimizing fluoroscopy exposure to ensure maternal and fetal safety. A 29-year-old woman at 15 weeks of gestation with sinus pauses presented with recurrent syncopal episodes. The patient underwent Micra™ AV leadless pacemaker implantation (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) with a radiation exposure of 26.5 mGy and a total fluoroscopy time of 2 min, which is generally considered a negligible dose during pregnancy, based on the recommendations of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. In pregnant patients, a leadless pacemaker may offer a viable alternative to conventional pacing, primarily due to its reduced radiation exposure, shorter procedure time, minimally invasive approach, absence of transvenous leads, and lower risk of site infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":36299,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management","volume":"17 3","pages":"6637-6642"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13068034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2026.17032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Bradyarrhythmias with syncope during pregnancy present a complex and multifaceted challenge for both patients and health care providers. When device implantation is indicated for bradyarrhythmia-associated syncope during pregnancy, the procedure should be performed with particular attention to minimizing fluoroscopy exposure to ensure maternal and fetal safety. A 29-year-old woman at 15 weeks of gestation with sinus pauses presented with recurrent syncopal episodes. The patient underwent Micra™ AV leadless pacemaker implantation (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) with a radiation exposure of 26.5 mGy and a total fluoroscopy time of 2 min, which is generally considered a negligible dose during pregnancy, based on the recommendations of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. In pregnant patients, a leadless pacemaker may offer a viable alternative to conventional pacing, primarily due to its reduced radiation exposure, shorter procedure time, minimally invasive approach, absence of transvenous leads, and lower risk of site infection.