Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib and Sorafenib in Thyroid Cancer: A Retrospective, Propensity-Score-Matched Study.

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Thyroid Pub Date : 2026-04-13 DOI:10.1177/10507256261442836
Max Kappenstein, Viktoria Florentine Koehler, Nadia Ninosu, Christine Koch, Michael Christoph Kreissl, Jörg Bojunga, Daniel Groener, Nikolas von Bubnoff
{"title":"Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib and Sorafenib in Thyroid Cancer: A Retrospective, Propensity-Score-Matched Study.","authors":"Max Kappenstein, Viktoria Florentine Koehler, Nadia Ninosu, Christine Koch, Michael Christoph Kreissl, Jörg Bojunga, Daniel Groener, Nikolas von Bubnoff","doi":"10.1177/10507256261442836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lenvatinib and sorafenib are multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (mTKIs) approved for the treatment of radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer (TC). In the absence of direct comparative clinical trials, we leveraged real-world TriNetX data to compare their effectiveness and tolerability in progressive TC. TriNetX is a federated international electronic medical record research network that aggregates anonymized data from multiple health care organizations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with TC initiating lenvatinib or sorafenib. Patients with other malignancies treated with these agents or exposure to the alternative mTKI were excluded. Propensity score matching was performed to balance demographic characteristics, tumor burden, and comorbidities. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) at 1 and 3 years. Secondary outcomes included all-cause hospitalization, emergency care utilization, and selected treatment-emergent adverse events. Exploratory subgroup analyses were performed across demographic, disease-related, and comorbidity strata.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With matched cohorts of 214 patients in each arm, lenvatinib was associated with significantly improved OS compared with sorafenib at both 1 year (78.5% vs. 64.5%; hazard ratio [HR] with confidence interval [CI] 0.538 [0.373-0.775]) and 3 years ([62.1% vs. 45.8%; HR with CI 0.590 [0.444-0.784]). All-cause hospitalization and emergency care admission rates were comparable. Hematological adverse events occurred more frequently with sorafenib, while renal and cardiovascular events trended higher with lenvatinib. Survival benefits with lenvatinib were consistent across subgroups and appeared especially pronounced in patients with high tumor burden.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lenvatinib was associated with improved OS compared with sorafenib in patients with TC, with broadly comparable safety profiles. These findings, based on retrospective real-world data, support the use of lenvatinib as a preferred first-line mTKI in line with current treatment paradigms.</p>","PeriodicalId":23016,"journal":{"name":"Thyroid","volume":" ","pages":"10507256261442836"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thyroid","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10507256261442836","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lenvatinib and sorafenib are multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (mTKIs) approved for the treatment of radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer (TC). In the absence of direct comparative clinical trials, we leveraged real-world TriNetX data to compare their effectiveness and tolerability in progressive TC. TriNetX is a federated international electronic medical record research network that aggregates anonymized data from multiple health care organizations.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with TC initiating lenvatinib or sorafenib. Patients with other malignancies treated with these agents or exposure to the alternative mTKI were excluded. Propensity score matching was performed to balance demographic characteristics, tumor burden, and comorbidities. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) at 1 and 3 years. Secondary outcomes included all-cause hospitalization, emergency care utilization, and selected treatment-emergent adverse events. Exploratory subgroup analyses were performed across demographic, disease-related, and comorbidity strata.

Results: With matched cohorts of 214 patients in each arm, lenvatinib was associated with significantly improved OS compared with sorafenib at both 1 year (78.5% vs. 64.5%; hazard ratio [HR] with confidence interval [CI] 0.538 [0.373-0.775]) and 3 years ([62.1% vs. 45.8%; HR with CI 0.590 [0.444-0.784]). All-cause hospitalization and emergency care admission rates were comparable. Hematological adverse events occurred more frequently with sorafenib, while renal and cardiovascular events trended higher with lenvatinib. Survival benefits with lenvatinib were consistent across subgroups and appeared especially pronounced in patients with high tumor burden.

Conclusions: Lenvatinib was associated with improved OS compared with sorafenib in patients with TC, with broadly comparable safety profiles. These findings, based on retrospective real-world data, support the use of lenvatinib as a preferred first-line mTKI in line with current treatment paradigms.

Lenvatinib和Sorafenib治疗甲状腺癌的实际疗效和安全性:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配研究。
背景:Lenvatinib和sorafenib是多靶点酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(mTKIs),被批准用于治疗放射性碘难治性甲状腺癌(TC)。在缺乏直接比较临床试验的情况下,我们利用真实世界的TriNetX数据来比较它们在进展性TC中的有效性和耐受性。TriNetX是一个联合国际电子医疗记录研究网络,汇集了来自多个医疗保健组织的匿名数据。方法:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了开始使用lenvatinib或sorafenib治疗的成年TC患者。用这些药物治疗的其他恶性肿瘤患者或暴露于替代mTKI的患者被排除在外。进行倾向评分匹配以平衡人口统计学特征、肿瘤负担和合并症。主要终点是1年和3年的总生存期(OS)。次要结局包括全因住院、急诊护理利用和选定的治疗后出现的不良事件。探索性亚组分析在人口统计学、疾病相关和合并症层面进行。结果:在每组214例患者的匹配队列中,lenvatinib与索拉非尼相比,在1年(78.5%比64.5%;风险比[HR],可信区间[0.373-0.775])和3年([62.1%比45.8%;HR,可信区间[0.444-0.784])与显著改善的OS相关。全因住院率和急诊住院率具有可比性。索拉非尼组血液系统不良事件发生率更高,而lenvatinib组肾脏和心血管事件发生率更高。lenvatinib的生存益处在各个亚组中是一致的,在高肿瘤负荷患者中尤其明显。结论:与索拉非尼相比,Lenvatinib与TC患者的OS改善相关,安全性大致相当。这些基于真实世界回顾性数据的研究结果支持lenvatinib作为一线mTKI治疗的首选,符合当前的治疗模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thyroid
Thyroid 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
195
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: This authoritative journal program, including the monthly flagship journal Thyroid, Clinical Thyroidology® (monthly), and VideoEndocrinology™ (quarterly), delivers in-depth coverage on topics from clinical application and primary care, to the latest advances in diagnostic imaging and surgical techniques and technologies, designed to optimize patient care and outcomes. Thyroid is the leading, peer-reviewed resource for original articles, patient-focused reports, and translational research on thyroid cancer and all thyroid related diseases. The Journal delivers the latest findings on topics from primary care to clinical application, and is the exclusive source for the authoritative and updated American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines for Managing Thyroid Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书