Three-stage anterior lumbar interbody fusion revision surgery for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage retrieval: surgical steps and preliminary results.

Q1 Medicine
Journal of spine surgery Pub Date : 2026-03-23 Epub Date: 2026-02-25 DOI:10.21037/jss-25-160
Francesco Caiazzo, Daniel Alveal-Mellado, Lucas Capo, Paula Lavezzolo, Judith Salat-Batlle, Beatriz Iguácel-Duarte, Juan Bago
{"title":"Three-stage anterior lumbar interbody fusion revision surgery for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage retrieval: surgical steps and preliminary results.","authors":"Francesco Caiazzo, Daniel Alveal-Mellado, Lucas Capo, Paula Lavezzolo, Judith Salat-Batlle, Beatriz Iguácel-Duarte, Juan Bago","doi":"10.21037/jss-25-160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Revising failed transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) presents significant surgical challenges, primarily due to the presence of dense scar tissue and pre-existing cage placement. While anterior surgical approaches offer superior visualization for cage retrieval, existing posterior instrumentation often complicates adequate intervertebral distraction, which is crucial for both comprehensive cage removal and effective deformity correction. Here, we detail a three-stage surgical strategy (back-front-back) adopted in Instituto Quirúrgico Spanò to overcome these inherent limitations. Stage 1 involves the careful removal of existing posterior rods and release of the posterior tension band to re-establish segmental mobility. Stage 2 proceeds with an anterior approach to facilitate the precise removal of the failed interbody cage, meticulous preparation of the endplates, and the subsequent implantation of a new, hyperlordotic anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) cage, essential for optimal restoration of sagittal alignment. Finally, stage 3 focuses on definitive posterior stabilization using new pedicle screws and rods. To assess the safety and efficacy of this technique, we conducted a retrospective review of 11 consecutive patients who underwent revision surgery, presenting with conditions such as pseudarthrosis, cage subsidence, or sagittal malalignment. The three-stage procedure was technically successful in all 11 patients, with no major complications reported at the one-year follow-up. The mean surgical time recorded was 258 minutes, with an average estimated blood loss of 493 mL. Postoperative imaging studies consistently confirmed satisfactory cage placement in all treated cases, demonstrating the viability and promising outcomes of this comprehensive surgical approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"12 3","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13063031/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-25-160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Revising failed transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) presents significant surgical challenges, primarily due to the presence of dense scar tissue and pre-existing cage placement. While anterior surgical approaches offer superior visualization for cage retrieval, existing posterior instrumentation often complicates adequate intervertebral distraction, which is crucial for both comprehensive cage removal and effective deformity correction. Here, we detail a three-stage surgical strategy (back-front-back) adopted in Instituto Quirúrgico Spanò to overcome these inherent limitations. Stage 1 involves the careful removal of existing posterior rods and release of the posterior tension band to re-establish segmental mobility. Stage 2 proceeds with an anterior approach to facilitate the precise removal of the failed interbody cage, meticulous preparation of the endplates, and the subsequent implantation of a new, hyperlordotic anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) cage, essential for optimal restoration of sagittal alignment. Finally, stage 3 focuses on definitive posterior stabilization using new pedicle screws and rods. To assess the safety and efficacy of this technique, we conducted a retrospective review of 11 consecutive patients who underwent revision surgery, presenting with conditions such as pseudarthrosis, cage subsidence, or sagittal malalignment. The three-stage procedure was technically successful in all 11 patients, with no major complications reported at the one-year follow-up. The mean surgical time recorded was 258 minutes, with an average estimated blood loss of 493 mL. Postoperative imaging studies consistently confirmed satisfactory cage placement in all treated cases, demonstrating the viability and promising outcomes of this comprehensive surgical approach.

经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合器取出的三期前路腰椎椎间融合翻修手术:手术步骤和初步结果。
修正失败的经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(tliff)提出了重大的手术挑战,主要是由于存在致密的疤痕组织和预先存在的cage放置。虽然前路手术入路为笼子取出提供了优越的视觉效果,但现有的后路内固定通常会使适当的椎间撑开复杂化,这对于全面的笼子取出和有效的畸形矫正至关重要。在这里,我们详细介绍了Instituto Quirúrgico Spanò采用的三阶段手术策略(后-前-后)来克服这些固有的局限性。第一阶段包括小心地去除现有的后棒并释放后张力带以重建节段性活动。第2阶段进行前路手术,以方便精确取出失败的椎间融合器,精心准备终板,随后植入新的前凸腰椎椎间融合器(ALIF),这对于最佳恢复矢状位排列至关重要。最后,第三阶段的重点是使用新的椎弓根螺钉和棒进行明确的后路稳定。为了评估该技术的安全性和有效性,我们对11例连续接受翻修手术的患者进行了回顾性研究,这些患者出现假关节、关节笼下沉或矢状面错位等情况。从技术上讲,这三个阶段的手术对所有11名患者都是成功的,在一年的随访中没有出现重大并发症。记录的平均手术时间为258分钟,平均估计失血量为493 mL。术后影像学研究一致证实,所有治疗病例的笼放置都令人满意,证明了这种综合手术方法的可行性和良好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of spine surgery
Journal of spine surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书