Demonstrating the feasibility of facet arthroplasty using the Total Posterior Spine System (TOPS) in the ambulatory surgery center (the TOPS outpatient experience).

Q1 Medicine
Journal of spine surgery Pub Date : 2026-03-23 Epub Date: 2026-02-26 DOI:10.21037/jss-2025-aw-214
Jared D Ament, Jack Petros, Cooper Gardner, Etai A Bergman, Amir Vokshoor
{"title":"Demonstrating the feasibility of facet arthroplasty using the Total Posterior Spine System (TOPS) in the ambulatory surgery center (the TOPS outpatient experience).","authors":"Jared D Ament, Jack Petros, Cooper Gardner, Etai A Bergman, Amir Vokshoor","doi":"10.21037/jss-2025-aw-214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The transition to the outpatient/ambulatory setting is especially important within value-based care system. While some procedures are well supported, posterior motion-preserving technologies, such as Total Posterior Spine System (TOPS), a novel artificial facet replacement, have yet to be evaluated in an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) setting. The objective of this study is to assess the feasibility, safety and early outcomes of the TOPS device in an ASC setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective case series, we reviewed 30 consecutive patients who underwent TOPS implantation at a free-standing ASC between September 2023 and December 2025. Demographics, intra-operative metrics, discharge data, 90-day events and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected from operative/anesthesia reports and the electronic medical record.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients were included; 14 males and 16 females, with a mean age and body mass index (BMI) of 62 years and 27±5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Mean estimated blood loss was 278±65.2 mL and mean operative time was 206±52 minutes. All patients were discharged the same day; 63% home, 37% to an after-care facility. There were no hospital admissions. Within 90 days three revision surgeries (10%) occurred for device malposition (n=2) and seroma drainage (n=1). By six months, mean visual analog scale (VAS) back pain decreased by 67.3%, right leg VAS by 93.8%, left leg VAS by 98.6%. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) improved by 71.5%, and patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) physical increased by 27.6%, and PROMIS mental by 13.8%. Mean patient satisfaction rose from 7.1/10 at six months to 9.8/10 at twelve months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This series demonstrates that TOPS facet arthroplasty can be safely and effectively performed in a free-standing ASC.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"12 3","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13063009/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-2025-aw-214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The transition to the outpatient/ambulatory setting is especially important within value-based care system. While some procedures are well supported, posterior motion-preserving technologies, such as Total Posterior Spine System (TOPS), a novel artificial facet replacement, have yet to be evaluated in an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) setting. The objective of this study is to assess the feasibility, safety and early outcomes of the TOPS device in an ASC setting.

Methods: In this retrospective case series, we reviewed 30 consecutive patients who underwent TOPS implantation at a free-standing ASC between September 2023 and December 2025. Demographics, intra-operative metrics, discharge data, 90-day events and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected from operative/anesthesia reports and the electronic medical record.

Results: Thirty patients were included; 14 males and 16 females, with a mean age and body mass index (BMI) of 62 years and 27±5 kg/m2, respectively. Mean estimated blood loss was 278±65.2 mL and mean operative time was 206±52 minutes. All patients were discharged the same day; 63% home, 37% to an after-care facility. There were no hospital admissions. Within 90 days three revision surgeries (10%) occurred for device malposition (n=2) and seroma drainage (n=1). By six months, mean visual analog scale (VAS) back pain decreased by 67.3%, right leg VAS by 93.8%, left leg VAS by 98.6%. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) improved by 71.5%, and patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) physical increased by 27.6%, and PROMIS mental by 13.8%. Mean patient satisfaction rose from 7.1/10 at six months to 9.8/10 at twelve months.

Conclusions: This series demonstrates that TOPS facet arthroplasty can be safely and effectively performed in a free-standing ASC.

在门诊手术中心演示使用全后脊柱系统(TOPS)进行小面关节成形术的可行性(TOPS门诊经验)。
背景:过渡到门诊/门诊设置是特别重要的价值为基础的护理系统。虽然一些手术得到了很好的支持,但后路运动保持技术,如全后路脊柱系统(TOPS),一种新型人工关节面置换术,尚未在门诊手术中心(ASC)进行评估。本研究的目的是评估在ASC环境中使用TOPS装置的可行性、安全性和早期结果。方法:在这个回顾性病例系列中,我们回顾了2023年9月至2025年12月在独立ASC连续接受TOPS植入的30例患者。从手术/麻醉报告和电子病历中收集人口统计学、术中指标、出院数据、90天事件和患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)。结果:纳入30例患者;男性14例,女性16例,平均年龄62岁,体重指数(BMI) 27±5 kg/m2。平均估计失血量278±65.2 mL,平均手术时间206±52分钟。所有患者均于当日出院;63%的人回家,37%的人去疗养院。没有人住院。90天内发生了3次翻修手术(10%),原因是器械错位(n=2)和血清肿引流(n=1)。6个月时,背部疼痛平均视觉模拟评分(VAS)下降67.3%,右腿VAS下降93.8%,左腿VAS下降98.6%。Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)提高了71.5%,患者报告的结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)身体评分提高了27.6%,精神评分提高了13.8%。患者平均满意度从6个月时的7.1/10上升到12个月时的9.8/10。结论:这一系列研究表明TOPS关节突置换术可以安全有效地在独立ASC中进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of spine surgery
Journal of spine surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书