Radiographic evaluation of the psoas and iliopsoas muscle as predictors for spinal cord ischemia after fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Kaj O Kappe, Jorn P Meekel, Tilo Kölbel, Petroula Nana, Giuseppe Panuccio, Jacco Engel, Jelmer M Wolterink, Vincent Jongkind, Kak Khee Yeung
{"title":"Radiographic evaluation of the psoas and iliopsoas muscle as predictors for spinal cord ischemia after fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair.","authors":"Kaj O Kappe, Jorn P Meekel, Tilo Kölbel, Petroula Nana, Giuseppe Panuccio, Jacco Engel, Jelmer M Wolterink, Vincent Jongkind, Kak Khee Yeung","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2026.03.628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the association between sarcopenia and spinal cord ischemia (SCI) after fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (F/B-EVAR) using two- and three-dimensional measurements of the psoas and iliopsoas muscles on preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, two-center study was conducted and reported in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. Data were collected from patients with Crawford type I-IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) and pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms treated with F/B-EVAR between December 2010 and January 2024. One center included all consecutive patients, whereas from the other center, patients with SCI were actively selected together with non-SCI patients in a 1:1 fashion based on patient and procedural characteristics. Preoperative CTAs were analyzed for surrogate markers of sarcopenia, including the psoas muscle area (cm<sup>2</sup>), lean psoas muscle area (cm<sup>2</sup> HU [Hounsfield units]), iliopsoas muscle volume (cm<sup>3</sup>), and lean iliopsoas muscle volume (cm<sup>3</sup> HU). Area measurements were performed manually, whereas volume measurements were performed using an artificial intelligence-based segmentation tool. The primary outcome was to evaluate the predictive value of the measured sarcopenia surrogate markers for SCI occurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 138 patients (35.5% female; median age 72 years, interquartile range [IQR]: 68-75 years), with 16 Crawford type I (11.6%), 45 type II (32.6%), 30 type III (21.7%), and 47 type IV/pararenal (34.1%) aneurysms, were included. Fifty-one patients had postoperative SCI (all severities), and 87 had no SCI symptoms. Compared with non-SCI patients, patients with SCI had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (P = .005), more commonly type II TAAA (P < .001), and symptomatic presentation (P = .016). Other patient characteristics were similar between the groups. Psoas muscle area (6.97 cm<sup>2</sup> [IQR: 5.22-8.73 cm<sup>2</sup>] vs 8.47 cm<sup>2</sup> [IQR: 6.39-10.03 cm<sup>2</sup>], P = .003), lean psoas muscle area (253.3 cm<sup>2</sup> HU [IQR: 204.9-333.8 cm<sup>2</sup> HU] vs 335.6 cm<sup>2</sup> HU [IQR: 256.3-409.7 cm<sup>2</sup> HU], P = .002), iliopsoas muscle volume (247.6 cm<sup>3</sup> [IQR: 184.0-303.8 cm<sup>3</sup>] vs 277.7 cm<sup>3</sup> [IQR: 234.1-331.5 cm<sup>3</sup>], P = .018), and lean iliopsoas muscle volume (10,879 cm<sup>3</sup> HU [IQR: 8589-14,497 cm<sup>3</sup> HU] vs 13,445 cm<sup>3</sup> HU [IQR: 10,777-16,396 cm<sup>3</sup> HU], P = .004) were lower in patients with SCI in the unadjusted analyses. On multivariable analysis, only psoas muscle area was independently associated with SCI (odds ratio: 0.815; 95% confidence interval: 0.680-0.977, P = .027).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Psoas muscle area was independently associated with SCI after F/B-EVAR, indicating that patients with signs of sarcopenia on preoperative CTA may be at a higher risk for SCI. Volumetric iliopsoas muscle measurements were not better predictors of SCI than two-dimensional measurements of the psoas muscle area.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2026.03.628","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the association between sarcopenia and spinal cord ischemia (SCI) after fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (F/B-EVAR) using two- and three-dimensional measurements of the psoas and iliopsoas muscles on preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA).

Methods: A retrospective, two-center study was conducted and reported in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. Data were collected from patients with Crawford type I-IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) and pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms treated with F/B-EVAR between December 2010 and January 2024. One center included all consecutive patients, whereas from the other center, patients with SCI were actively selected together with non-SCI patients in a 1:1 fashion based on patient and procedural characteristics. Preoperative CTAs were analyzed for surrogate markers of sarcopenia, including the psoas muscle area (cm2), lean psoas muscle area (cm2 HU [Hounsfield units]), iliopsoas muscle volume (cm3), and lean iliopsoas muscle volume (cm3 HU). Area measurements were performed manually, whereas volume measurements were performed using an artificial intelligence-based segmentation tool. The primary outcome was to evaluate the predictive value of the measured sarcopenia surrogate markers for SCI occurrence.

Results: A total of 138 patients (35.5% female; median age 72 years, interquartile range [IQR]: 68-75 years), with 16 Crawford type I (11.6%), 45 type II (32.6%), 30 type III (21.7%), and 47 type IV/pararenal (34.1%) aneurysms, were included. Fifty-one patients had postoperative SCI (all severities), and 87 had no SCI symptoms. Compared with non-SCI patients, patients with SCI had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (P = .005), more commonly type II TAAA (P < .001), and symptomatic presentation (P = .016). Other patient characteristics were similar between the groups. Psoas muscle area (6.97 cm2 [IQR: 5.22-8.73 cm2] vs 8.47 cm2 [IQR: 6.39-10.03 cm2], P = .003), lean psoas muscle area (253.3 cm2 HU [IQR: 204.9-333.8 cm2 HU] vs 335.6 cm2 HU [IQR: 256.3-409.7 cm2 HU], P = .002), iliopsoas muscle volume (247.6 cm3 [IQR: 184.0-303.8 cm3] vs 277.7 cm3 [IQR: 234.1-331.5 cm3], P = .018), and lean iliopsoas muscle volume (10,879 cm3 HU [IQR: 8589-14,497 cm3 HU] vs 13,445 cm3 HU [IQR: 10,777-16,396 cm3 HU], P = .004) were lower in patients with SCI in the unadjusted analyses. On multivariable analysis, only psoas muscle area was independently associated with SCI (odds ratio: 0.815; 95% confidence interval: 0.680-0.977, P = .027).

Conclusions: Psoas muscle area was independently associated with SCI after F/B-EVAR, indicating that patients with signs of sarcopenia on preoperative CTA may be at a higher risk for SCI. Volumetric iliopsoas muscle measurements were not better predictors of SCI than two-dimensional measurements of the psoas muscle area.

腰大肌和髂腰肌作为开窗和分支血管内主动脉修复后脊髓缺血预测指标的影像学评价。
目的:本研究旨在通过术前计算机断层血管造影(CTA)对腰肌和髂腰肌的二维和三维测量,探讨开窗和分支血管内主动脉修复(F/B-EVAR)后肌肉减少与脊髓缺血(SCI)的关系。方法:采用回顾性双中心研究,并按照STROBE指南进行报道。数据收集于2010年12月至2024年1月期间接受F/B-EVAR治疗的Crawford I-IV型胸腹主动脉瘤(TAAA)和肾旁腹主动脉瘤(AAA)患者。一个中心包括所有连续的患者,而另一个中心根据患者和程序特征,以1:1的方式积极选择SCI患者和非SCI患者。术前cta分析肌肉减少的替代指标,包括腰肌面积[cm2]、腰肌瘦面积(LPMA, [cm2*HU])、髂腰肌体积[cm3]、髂腰肌瘦体积(LIMV, [cm3*HU])。面积测量是手动进行的,而体积测量是使用基于人工智能的分割工具进行的。主要结果是评估测量的肌少症替代标志物对脊髓损伤发生的预测价值。结果:共138例(女性35.5%,中位年龄72岁,IQR: 68 ~ 75岁),其中Crawford I型动脉瘤16例(11.6%),II型动脉瘤45例(32.6%),III型动脉瘤30例(21.7%),IV型/肾旁动脉瘤47例(34.1%)。51例患者术后发生SCI(所有严重程度),87例患者无SCI症状。与非SCI患者相比,SCI患者ASA分级更高(p=0.005),更常见的是II型TAAA (p2 [IQR: 5.22-8.73] vs. 8.47 cm2 [IQR: 6.39-10.03], p= 0.003), LPMA (253.3 cm2*HU [IQR: 204.9-333.8] vs. 335.6 cm2*HU [IQR: 256.3-409.7], p= 0.002),髂腰肌体积(247.6 cm3 [IQR: 184.0 - 303.8] vs. 277.7 cm3 [IQR: 234.1 - 331.5], p= 0.018), LIMV (10879 cm3*HU [IQR: 8589 - 14497] vs. 13445 cm3*HU [IQR: 8589 - 14497] vs. 13445 cm3*HU [IQR: 8589 - 14497]:[10777 - 16396], p = 0.004),在未校正的分析中,脊髓损伤患者中较低。在多变量分析中,只有腰肌面积与SCI独立相关(OR: 0.815; 95% CI: 0.680-0.977, p=0.027)。结论:腰大肌面积与F/B-EVAR后SCI独立相关,提示术前CTA显示肌肉减少的患者发生SCI的风险较高。髂腰肌体积测量并不比腰肌面积的二维测量更好地预测脊髓损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书