Symptomatic Accessory Ossicle Near the Medial Malleolus Simulating Fracture Non-union: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Rajesh K Rajnish, Akshant Chandel, Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Abhay Elhence, Prabodh Kantiwal, Kartikey Dubey
{"title":"Symptomatic Accessory Ossicle Near the Medial Malleolus Simulating Fracture Non-union: A Case Report and Literature Review.","authors":"Rajesh K Rajnish, Akshant Chandel, Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Abhay Elhence, Prabodh Kantiwal, Kartikey Dubey","doi":"10.13107/jocr.2026.v16.i04.7110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accessory ossicles of the ankle and foot are normal anatomical variants that are usually asymptomatic. The os subtibiale is a rare accessory ossicle located just inferior to the medial malleolus, with a reported prevalence of 0.9-1.2% in the general population. When symptomatic, it can mimic fractures or fracture non-union, leading to diagnostic confusion. Accurate diagnosis relies on careful clinical evaluation and appropriate imaging.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>A 20-year-old male presented with persistent pain around the right ankle, 7 months after sustaining a twisting injury while walking. He was initially treated by a local bonesetter and presented late to our facility with unresolved symptoms. Clinical and radiological evaluation initially suggested a medial malleolus fracture non-union. However, further imaging revealed a well-corticated, smooth-margined bone fragment inferior to the medial malleolus, consistent with a symptomatic os subtibiale. The patient underwent open excision of the ossicle under spinal anesthesia. Intraoperative findings confirmed the diagnosis. Postoperatively, ankle range of motion and weight-bearing were initiated as tolerated. At the 1-year follow-up, the patient was pain-free and had regained full ankle function.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case highlights the importance of differentiating between a medial malleolus fracture non-union and a symptomatic os subtibiale, particularly in patients presenting late after ankle trauma. Awareness of this rare entity and its imaging characteristics is crucial to avoid misdiagnosis and ensure appropriate management, leading to excellent clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16647,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","volume":"16 4","pages":"252-257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13062423/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2026.v16.i04.7110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Accessory ossicles of the ankle and foot are normal anatomical variants that are usually asymptomatic. The os subtibiale is a rare accessory ossicle located just inferior to the medial malleolus, with a reported prevalence of 0.9-1.2% in the general population. When symptomatic, it can mimic fractures or fracture non-union, leading to diagnostic confusion. Accurate diagnosis relies on careful clinical evaluation and appropriate imaging.

Case report: A 20-year-old male presented with persistent pain around the right ankle, 7 months after sustaining a twisting injury while walking. He was initially treated by a local bonesetter and presented late to our facility with unresolved symptoms. Clinical and radiological evaluation initially suggested a medial malleolus fracture non-union. However, further imaging revealed a well-corticated, smooth-margined bone fragment inferior to the medial malleolus, consistent with a symptomatic os subtibiale. The patient underwent open excision of the ossicle under spinal anesthesia. Intraoperative findings confirmed the diagnosis. Postoperatively, ankle range of motion and weight-bearing were initiated as tolerated. At the 1-year follow-up, the patient was pain-free and had regained full ankle function.

Conclusion: This case highlights the importance of differentiating between a medial malleolus fracture non-union and a symptomatic os subtibiale, particularly in patients presenting late after ankle trauma. Awareness of this rare entity and its imaging characteristics is crucial to avoid misdiagnosis and ensure appropriate management, leading to excellent clinical outcomes.

内踝附近症状性副听骨模拟骨折不愈合1例报告及文献复习。
简介:踝关节和足部的副小骨是正常的解剖变异,通常无症状。下胫腓骨是一种罕见的副听骨,位于内踝下方,据报道在一般人群中发病率为0.9-1.2%。当有症状时,它可以模拟骨折或骨折不愈合,导致诊断混乱。准确的诊断依赖于仔细的临床评估和适当的影像学检查。病例报告:一名20岁男性,在行走时扭伤7个月后,右脚踝周围持续疼痛。他最初由当地的一名接骨师治疗,后来因未解决的症状来到我们的机构。临床和放射学评估最初提示内踝骨折不愈合。然而,进一步影像学显示内踝下方有皮质良好、边缘光滑的骨碎片,符合症状性胫腓骨。患者在脊髓麻醉下行听骨切开切除术。术中发现证实了诊断。术后,踝关节活动范围和负重在耐受范围内开始。在1年的随访中,患者无疼痛,踝关节功能完全恢复。结论:本病例强调了区分内踝骨折不愈合和症状性胫腓骨不愈合的重要性,特别是在踝关节创伤后晚期出现的患者。了解这种罕见的实体及其影像学特征对于避免误诊和确保适当的治疗至关重要,从而获得良好的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书