Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of the Addition of Lacosamide to Duloxetine in the Treatment of Taxane-induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial.
{"title":"Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of the Addition of Lacosamide to Duloxetine in the Treatment of Taxane-induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial.","authors":"Minoo Moghimi, Ehsan Zaboli, Leila Mirzakhani, Mohammad Eslamijouybari, Zahra Nekoukar, Hamidreza Namvar, Mahmood Moosazadeh, Ebrahim Salehifar","doi":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_39_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy (TIPN) is a frequent and potentially dose-limiting condition. Despite extensive research, there are still no clear guidelines for treating or preventing TIPN, though recent findings indicate that lacosamide may help relieve acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy. Based on this, the present study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of combining lacosamide with duloxetine in the treatment of TIPN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial enrolled patients undergoing chemotherapy regimens including paclitaxel or docetaxel who developed neuropathy and met predefined inclusion criteria. All participants received duloxetine therapy, initiated at 30 mg per day for the 1<sup>st</sup> week and increased to 60 mg daily for the following 11 weeks. In addition, subjects were randomized to receive either lacosamide 200 mg twice daily or a matched placebo. The main outcomes included neuropathy severity assessed at baseline, week 6, and week 12. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 20, with statistical significance defined as a <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Both groups showed improvements over time, with reductions in numerical pain rating scale, National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Taxane, and Neuropathy Pain Scale scores, and increased scores on the GHS/QoL scale. However, comparisons between the two groups revealed no statistically significant differences at any time point. Similarly, the EORTC QLQ-C30 symptom subscales did not demonstrate significant between-group differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that duloxetine alone and its combination with lacosamide both alleviated neuropathic symptoms and improved functional outcomes in patients with TIPN. Nonetheless, the addition of lacosamide did not confer a statistically significant advantage over duloxetine monotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","volume":"15 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13067963/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_39_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy (TIPN) is a frequent and potentially dose-limiting condition. Despite extensive research, there are still no clear guidelines for treating or preventing TIPN, though recent findings indicate that lacosamide may help relieve acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy. Based on this, the present study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of combining lacosamide with duloxetine in the treatment of TIPN.
Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial enrolled patients undergoing chemotherapy regimens including paclitaxel or docetaxel who developed neuropathy and met predefined inclusion criteria. All participants received duloxetine therapy, initiated at 30 mg per day for the 1st week and increased to 60 mg daily for the following 11 weeks. In addition, subjects were randomized to receive either lacosamide 200 mg twice daily or a matched placebo. The main outcomes included neuropathy severity assessed at baseline, week 6, and week 12. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 20, with statistical significance defined as a P < 0.05.
Findings: Both groups showed improvements over time, with reductions in numerical pain rating scale, National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Taxane, and Neuropathy Pain Scale scores, and increased scores on the GHS/QoL scale. However, comparisons between the two groups revealed no statistically significant differences at any time point. Similarly, the EORTC QLQ-C30 symptom subscales did not demonstrate significant between-group differences.
Conclusion: This study found that duloxetine alone and its combination with lacosamide both alleviated neuropathic symptoms and improved functional outcomes in patients with TIPN. Nonetheless, the addition of lacosamide did not confer a statistically significant advantage over duloxetine monotherapy.
目的:紫杉烷诱导的周围神经病变(TIPN)是一种常见且潜在的剂量限制性疾病。尽管进行了广泛的研究,但仍然没有明确的治疗或预防TIPN的指南,尽管最近的研究结果表明拉科沙胺可能有助于缓解急性奥沙利铂诱导的神经病变。基于此,本研究评估拉科沙胺联合度洛西汀治疗TIPN的疗效和安全性。方法:这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的临床试验纳入了接受包括紫杉醇或多西紫杉醇在内的化疗方案的神经病变患者,并符合预先确定的纳入标准。所有参与者均接受度洛西汀治疗,第一周起始剂量为每天30毫克,随后11周增加到每天60毫克。此外,受试者随机接受拉科沙胺200毫克,每日两次或匹配的安慰剂。主要结果包括基线、第6周和第12周评估的神经病变严重程度。数据分析采用SPSS version 20, P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:随着时间的推移,两组患者均有所改善,疼痛评定量表、美国国家癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准、癌症治疗功能评估-紫杉烷和神经性疼痛量表评分均有所降低,GHS/QoL评分均有所提高。然而,两组之间的比较在任何时间点上都没有统计学上的显著差异。同样,EORTC QLQ-C30症状量表在组间无显著差异。结论:本研究发现度洛西汀单用及联用拉科沙胺均可减轻TIPN患者的神经病变症状,改善功能结局。尽管如此,与度洛西汀单药治疗相比,拉科沙胺的加入并没有统计学上的显著优势。
期刊介绍:
The main focus of the journal will be on evidence-based drug-related medical researches (with clinical pharmacists’ intervention or documentation), particularly in the Eastern Mediterranean region. However, a wide range of closely related issues will be also covered. These will include clinical studies in the field of pharmaceutical care, reporting adverse drug reactions and human medical toxicology, pharmaco-epidemiology and toxico-epidemiology (poisoning epidemiology), social aspects of pharmacy practice, pharmacy education and economic evaluations of treatment protocols (e.g. cost-effectiveness studies). Local reports of medication utilization studies at hospital or pharmacy levels will only be considered for peer-review process only if they have a new and useful message for the international pharmacy practice professionals and readers.