Psychotherapeutic Techniques for Dyspnea in Cancer and Chronic Illness: Systematic Review.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jun Kako, Kohei Kajiwara, Masamitsu Kobayashi, Yoshiyasu Ito, Kanako Ichikura, Yoshinobu Matsuda, Takashi Yamaguchi
{"title":"Psychotherapeutic Techniques for Dyspnea in Cancer and Chronic Illness: Systematic Review.","authors":"Jun Kako, Kohei Kajiwara, Masamitsu Kobayashi, Yoshiyasu Ito, Kanako Ichikura, Yoshinobu Matsuda, Takashi Yamaguchi","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2026.03.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Psychotherapeutic interventions show promise for managing dyspnea in patients with cancer and other serious illnesses, but evidence synthesis has been limited by substantial heterogeneity. Additionally, the characteristics of interventional delivery remain poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review examined the characteristics of psychotherapeutic techniques-mindful breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, meditation, and guided imagery-to inform standardization, clinical application, and digital development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and Scopus from inception through 17 January 2025 for quantitative interventional studies evaluating these techniques for dyspnea in adults. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and extracted data on the delivery methods, session structure, provider requirements, and self-practice components. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two studies were included, mindful breathing (n=5), progressive muscle relaxation (n=11), meditation (n=4), guided imagery (n=2), and multicomponent interventions (n=20). Substantial heterogeneity in intervention delivery was identified, even within the same technique, including session duration, frequency, provider training, and home practice components. Psychotherapeutic techniques were predominantly delivered through multicomponent interventions (20/42 studies), most frequently combined with education, breathing techniques (16 studies each), and exercise (11 studies). Most studies met only one to three of the five MMAT criteria, indicating early-stage evidence development.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Psychotherapeutic techniques for dyspnea demonstrate substantial delivery heterogeneity and are predominantly integrated into multicomponent programs. Future research should distinguish the core from adaptable components, integrate psychotherapeutic techniques with education and self-management strategies, and employ rigorous designs with standardised reporting to advance this clinically relevant field.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2026.03.021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Psychotherapeutic interventions show promise for managing dyspnea in patients with cancer and other serious illnesses, but evidence synthesis has been limited by substantial heterogeneity. Additionally, the characteristics of interventional delivery remain poorly understood.

Objective: This systematic review examined the characteristics of psychotherapeutic techniques-mindful breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, meditation, and guided imagery-to inform standardization, clinical application, and digital development.

Methods: We searched PubMed, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and Scopus from inception through 17 January 2025 for quantitative interventional studies evaluating these techniques for dyspnea in adults. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and extracted data on the delivery methods, session structure, provider requirements, and self-practice components. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).

Results: Forty-two studies were included, mindful breathing (n=5), progressive muscle relaxation (n=11), meditation (n=4), guided imagery (n=2), and multicomponent interventions (n=20). Substantial heterogeneity in intervention delivery was identified, even within the same technique, including session duration, frequency, provider training, and home practice components. Psychotherapeutic techniques were predominantly delivered through multicomponent interventions (20/42 studies), most frequently combined with education, breathing techniques (16 studies each), and exercise (11 studies). Most studies met only one to three of the five MMAT criteria, indicating early-stage evidence development.

Conclusions: Psychotherapeutic techniques for dyspnea demonstrate substantial delivery heterogeneity and are predominantly integrated into multicomponent programs. Future research should distinguish the core from adaptable components, integrate psychotherapeutic techniques with education and self-management strategies, and employ rigorous designs with standardised reporting to advance this clinically relevant field.

癌症和慢性疾病呼吸困难的心理治疗技术:系统综述。
背景:心理治疗干预显示出治疗癌症和其他严重疾病患者呼吸困难的希望,但证据综合受到实质性异质性的限制。此外,介入分娩的特点仍然知之甚少。目的:本系统综述探讨了心理治疗技术的特点——正念呼吸、渐进式肌肉放松、冥想和引导成像——为标准化、临床应用和数字化发展提供信息。方法:我们检索了PubMed、CINAHL、CENTRAL和Scopus从开始到2025年1月17日的定量介入研究,评估这些技术治疗成人呼吸困难的效果。两名审稿人独立筛选研究并提取有关交付方法、会话结构、提供者需求和自我实践组件的数据。采用混合方法评估工具(MMAT)评估方法学质量。结果:纳入42项研究,正念呼吸(n=5)、渐进式肌肉放松(n=11)、冥想(n=4)、引导意象(n=2)和多成分干预(n=20)。即使在相同的技术中,包括疗程持续时间、频率、提供者培训和家庭实践组成部分,干预交付也存在实质性的异质性。心理治疗技术主要通过多组分干预(20/42项研究)提供,最常见的是与教育、呼吸技术(各16项研究)和运动(11项研究)相结合。大多数研究仅满足MMAT五项标准中的一到三项,表明证据尚处于早期发展阶段。结论:呼吸困难的心理治疗技术表现出实质性的传递异质性,并主要整合到多组分方案中。未来的研究应区分核心成分和适应性成分,将心理治疗技术与教育和自我管理策略相结合,并采用严格的设计和标准化的报告来推进这一临床相关领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书