Implementing the EU HTA regulation and joint clinical assessment: a multi-stakeholder perspective from Italy.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Michela Meregaglia, Francesco Costa, Ludovico Cavallaro, Patrizio Armeni, Monica Hildegard Otto
{"title":"Implementing the EU HTA regulation and joint clinical assessment: a multi-stakeholder perspective from Italy.","authors":"Michela Meregaglia, Francesco Costa, Ludovico Cavallaro, Patrizio Armeni, Monica Hildegard Otto","doi":"10.1017/S026646232610364X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 on Health Technology Assessment (HTAR), which applies as of January 2025, introduces the Joint Clinical Assessment (JCA) for selected health technologies and establishes a stakeholder network. This study aims to evaluate the expected impact of the implementation of the HTAR from a multi-stakeholder perspective, using Italy as a case study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping literature review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines to inform the development of an interview guide. Target participants included Italian stakeholder representatives with an interest in the HTAR. One-on-one semi-structured interviews were conducted virtually at the end of 2024. The questions were categorized into three main topics: expected benefits and opportunities; foreseen risks or challenges; recommended actions. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic content analysis techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen participants included representatives from national and regional HTA bodies, health technology developers' associations, health professional associations, patient organizations, and HTA experts. The JCA is expected to enhance the quality of clinical assessment and to result in faster and more equitable access to health innovations. However, the timing will depend on the extent to which Member States require complementary analyses. Health technology developers benefit from submitting a single JCA dossier, but often cope with limited evidence and short-term deadlines. The interviewees recommended harmonizing evidence standards, investing in HTA education and training, and fostering strategic stakeholder collaborations.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The process of harmonization induced by the HTAR is beneficial to standardize clinical assessment at the EU level, but needs to reconcile different stakeholder perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":"42 1","pages":"e39"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13078104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646232610364X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 on Health Technology Assessment (HTAR), which applies as of January 2025, introduces the Joint Clinical Assessment (JCA) for selected health technologies and establishes a stakeholder network. This study aims to evaluate the expected impact of the implementation of the HTAR from a multi-stakeholder perspective, using Italy as a case study.

Methods: A scoping literature review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines to inform the development of an interview guide. Target participants included Italian stakeholder representatives with an interest in the HTAR. One-on-one semi-structured interviews were conducted virtually at the end of 2024. The questions were categorized into three main topics: expected benefits and opportunities; foreseen risks or challenges; recommended actions. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic content analysis techniques.

Results: Thirteen participants included representatives from national and regional HTA bodies, health technology developers' associations, health professional associations, patient organizations, and HTA experts. The JCA is expected to enhance the quality of clinical assessment and to result in faster and more equitable access to health innovations. However, the timing will depend on the extent to which Member States require complementary analyses. Health technology developers benefit from submitting a single JCA dossier, but often cope with limited evidence and short-term deadlines. The interviewees recommended harmonizing evidence standards, investing in HTA education and training, and fostering strategic stakeholder collaborations.

Discussion: The process of harmonization induced by the HTAR is beneficial to standardize clinical assessment at the EU level, but needs to reconcile different stakeholder perspectives.

实施欧盟HTA法规和联合临床评估:来自意大利的多方利益相关者视角。
背景:法规(EU) 2021/2282关于卫生技术评估(HTAR),自2025年1月起实施,引入了针对选定卫生技术的联合临床评估(JCA),并建立了利益相关者网络。本研究旨在从多方利益相关者的角度评估HTAR实施的预期影响,并以意大利为案例研究。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行范围文献综述,为访谈指南的制定提供信息。目标参与者包括对HTAR感兴趣的意大利利益攸关方代表。在2024年底进行了一对一的半结构化访谈。这些问题主要分为三个主题:预期收益和机会;预见到的风险或挑战;建议的行动。采访被逐字记录下来,并使用主题内容分析技术进行分析。结果:13名参与者包括来自国家和地区HTA机构、卫生技术开发协会、卫生专业协会、患者组织和HTA专家的代表。预计联合评估将提高临床评估的质量,并导致更快和更公平地获得保健创新。但是,时间将取决于会员国需要补充分析的程度。卫生技术开发人员可以从提交单一的JCA档案中受益,但往往要应付有限的证据和短期的截止日期。受访者建议统一证据标准,投资于HTA教育和培训,并促进战略利益攸关方合作。讨论:HTAR引发的协调过程有利于欧盟层面的临床评估标准化,但需要协调不同利益相关者的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书